Mission Europa Netzwerk Karl Martell

Archive for the ‘Counterjihad’ Category

Germany on the Brink

Posted by paulipoldie on June 8, 2011

In Stuttgart, Germany, last week, violent Leftist and Islamic supremacist demonstrators violently menaced anti-jihad activists – giving a sobering picture of where Germany, Europe, and the U.S. as well are headed if we don’t stand up and resolutely defend our freedom now.

 

Thursday afternoon I spoke in Stuttgart at the invitation of the human rights group Pax Europa. The event was well advertised, and so the thuggish Leftist/Islamic supremacist alliance mobilized and was out in full force.

 

About a thousand protesters from the frequently violent hard-Left Antifa group showed up, along with around 500 German riot police. “Antifa” stands for “Anti-fascism,” but if any fascism was on display, it was from the “anti-fascists,” who did their best to destroy the Pax Europa event. They were menacing people, starting fights, banging drums, blowing whistles, and chanting Leftist and Communist agitprop slogans. One young man from Antifa came up to me as I was standing right in front of a line of German police and said, “You’re lucky there are so many police here today.” He was not expressing solidarity.

 

Pax Europa had planned a full program featuring Middle Eastern Christian musicians, a Coptic Christian activist, and others, so as to highlight the hollowness of the Islamic supremacist narrative of Muslim victimhood and anti-jihadist racism. But the police ordered the Pax Europa organizers to drastically reduce the scope of their event. Everyone was restricted to ten minutes only. Several participants opted not to appear, in light of the manifest danger. Antifa people were attacking supporters of Pax Europa. I saw several individuals being chased by rabid Leftist gangs. At least one man went to the hospital.

 

The police used loudspeakers to call on Antifa twice to disperse, as Pax Europa had lawfully reserved the space for their event. The Antifa people responded only by moving forward, chanting slogans, banging their drums, and holding aloft the usual Leftist kitsch — Che Guevara, the hammer and sickle, the Palestinian flag, signs denouncing Islamophobia, etc. The police moved them back a bit but did not ask them again to disperse, and allowed the Pax Europa event to begin.

 

It was an incredible din. We had loudspeakers that appeared to be able to reach the considerable crowd behind the protesters, but the Antifa thugs did all they could to drown us out: the drums got louder, the vuvuzelas came out, they were blowing whistles, and of course they were screaming and yelling. They also started throwing things: bottles, ice eggs, excrement and more. One bottle narrowly missed the Coptic activist’s head and crashed onto the stage — other bottles crashed at our feet. Several speakers were hit with eggs. The manure they threw was all over the stage floor.

 

It was like looking into the pit of hell. Here were young people passionately committed to their cause and believing it to be that of justice and freedom, and they are eager and willing useful idiots for the most radically intolerant ideology on the planet. So when my turn came to speak, I addressed them, and told them just that. I told them they wouldn’t like what happened to them when their friends took power, but by then it would be too late for them.

 

The menace continued. Antifa burned the truck belonging to the company that set up the stage for Pax Europa’s Thursday rally. Friday night they found out the hotel that the courageous anti-jihad politician René Stadtkewitz was planning to stay in when he came to Stuttgart to announce the founding of the local branch of his new Freedom Party; they reportedly broke the hotel’s windows and painted threatening messages on its walls. Also yesterday, I spoke to a Pax Europa meeting at a location in Stuttgart; Antifa thugs found out the location after the meeting had ended, and stormed and surrounded the place. Thirty-six were arrested.

 

But it is not too late for Europe. I spoke at Stadtkewitz’s Freedom Party event on Sunday, and found a crowd made all the more resolute and determined by the violent intimidation to which they had been subjected. They realize that freedom hangs in the balance today in Germany, and in Europe and the U.S. as well, and they’re prepared to take a stand.

 

That was a great source of hope. Saturday morning I had the great honor of meeting with Susanne Zeller-Hirzel, one of the last surviving members of the White Rose, the nonviolent resistance movement that worked against Hitler’s regime in Nazi Germany in 1942 and 1943. We discussed numerous parallels between the Nazi era in Germany and the advance of Islamic supremacism today — as we saw in Stuttgart Thursday, Nazis and Islamic supremacists are remarkably similar in their taste for using force to shut down opponents they can’t out-argue.

 

It’s time for the White Rose to flower again in Germany. And as Islamic supremacism continues to advance in the U.S. also, we are not far behind.

Mr. Spencer is director of Jihad Watch and author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), The Truth About Muhammad, Stealth Jihad and The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran (all from Regnery-a HUMAN EVENTS sister company).

Posted in Counterjihad, Dhimmitude, Diskriminierung/Discrimination, Fight back!, Freedom of Speech/Redefreiheit, Human Rights - menschenrechte, Islam, Islam - What can we do? Was können wir tun?, Islamization, Sharia, Stuttgart June 2011 | Tagged: , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Pressemitteilung zum „Islamkritisches Wochenende zur Christenverfolgung“

Posted by paulipoldie on June 8, 2011

Bürgerbewegung PAX EUROPA e.V. , Landesverband Baden-Württemberg

Pressemitteilung „Islamkritisches Wochenende zur Christenverfolgung“ in Stuttgart 2.-5.6.2011

Mehrere Hunderte Linksextremisten, gewaltbereite Unterstützer und Sympathisanten aus dem linken Milieu sowie den Gewerkschaften haben am Donnerstag die von uns ordnungsgemäß und gesetzeskonform angemeldete Kundgebung auf dem Schlossplatz zum Thema Christenverfolgung im Veranstaltungsprogramm des „Islamkritischen Wochenendes“ massiv gestört, kurzzeitig unsere Bühne besetzt, Teilnehmer angegriffen, verletzt und noch nach der Veranstaltung verfolgt und bedroht.

Unser Rederecht wurde durch eine milde, fast zurückhaltende Gewaltanwendung der Polizei kurzzeitig ermöglicht. Durch hirnlosen Lärm und fortgesetzte Wurfattacken mit Flaschen und Eiern bekundeten die gewaltbereiten Linksextremisten jedoch fehlendes Interesse an jeglichen vorgetragenen Fakten zur Christenverfolgung in den meisten islamischen und auch vielen sozialistisch geführten Ländern und verdeutlichten so vielen Zuschauern, was unser Land erwartet, wenn sich totalitäre Ideologien durchsetzen. So wird ein aufgehetzter Mob die freie Meinungsäußerung verhindern wollen und Redner bei Gefahr für Leib und Leben bedrohen. Eine erschreckende Zukunftsperspektive für unser Land!

Wer, wie diese Störer, danach körperliche Gewalt gegen gesellschaftliche Gegner gutheißt und sich im Internet z.B. Indymedia sowie anderen Medien damit danach brüstet, verhält sich gesetzwidrig und moralisch verwerflich und sollte das Jammern über angeblich 19 von der Polizei zur alleinigen Durchsetzung eines demokratischen Rechts festgenommener Aggressoren lassen. Zudem wurde in der darauf folgenden Nacht ein Fahrzeug des Bühnenbauunternehmens angezündet und ein Sachschaden in beträchtlicher Höhe verursacht. Derartiges ist neuerdings also auch in Stuttgart möglich. Brennen wieder zuerst Sachen, dann Menschen?

Unser Islamkritisches Wochenende fand erfolgreich mit Vorträgen, Workshops und Seminaren an zwei weiteren arbeitsreichen Tagen mit insgesamt über 70 Teilnehmern statt. Qualifizierte Referenten ermöglichten eine intensive Arbeit zum sich immer mehr radikalisierenden Islam in der Welt und lieferten einem breit gestreuten gesellschaftlichen und internationalen Teilnehmerfeld Fakten und Tatsachen über die daraus resultierende Christenverfolgung sowie über die drohende Gefahr dieser importierten Herrschaftsideologie für Deutschland.

Wir bedauern sehr, dass am Samstag der Veranstaltungsort einer der drei Freitagsseminare bei der Piusbruderschaft in Feuerbach angegriffen wurde und begrüßen die entschiedene Aktion der Stuttgarter Polizei gegen randalierende, teilweise alkoholisierte Linksextremisten, die offensichtlich immer weniger Hemmung zeigten, das Gesetz zu ignorieren oder gar bewusst zu brechen. In der Folge wurden anscheinend 32 Verhaftungen vorgenommen.

Die für Sonntag geplante öffentliche Veranstaltung musste leider aus Sicherheitsgründen ausfallen. Veranstalter und Polizei konnten aufgrund angekündigter Ausschreitungen von linksextremistischen und bedauerlicherweise auch von gewerkschaftlich unterstützten Gruppen nicht für die Sicherheit und Unversehrtheit unserer teilnehmenden jüdischen Freunde und der ausländischen Gäste garantieren.

Gegen alle Widrigkeiten und Angriffe ist es uns gelungen in Stuttgart ein mehrtägiges, sehr informatives Treffen mit großem Nutzen für alle Teilnehmer zu organisieren. Es wird notwendig sein, dies in ähnlicher Form auf breiterer Basis weiterzuführen. Hierzu rufen wir alle gesellschaftlich fortschrittlichen Kräfte in diesem Land auf. Für europäische Freiheiten und Werte – gegen die schleichende Islamisierung!

BPE Landesverband Baden-Württemberg
Kontakt: baden-wuerttemberg@buergerbewegung-pax-europa.de

Posted in Christenverfolgung, Counterjihad, Diskriminierung/Discrimination, Fight back!, Islam, Islam - What can we do? Was können wir tun?, Islamisierung, Islamkritik, Stuttgart June 2011 | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »

Stuttgart-Augenzeuge: Kein Schutz durch Polizei

Posted by paulipoldie on June 6, 2011

Ich habe große Sorge…

Das Neue Deutschland

“Der neue Faschismus wird nicht sagen: ‘Ich bin der Faschismus”
Er wird sagen: “Ich bin der Antifaschismus’

Ignazio Silone. italienischer Sozialist, 1900-78

******************************************************************************************

Dankend von PI übernommen:

Uns erreichte ein bewegender Augenzeugenbericht von den skandalösen Geschehnissen bei der Auftaktveranstaltung zum “Großen islamkritischen Wochenende” am Himmelfahrtstag in Stuttgart. Besonders das fragwürdige Verhalten der Polizei (PI berichtete) wird in der Schilderung von Benjamin F. eindringlich beleuchtet.

Proteste von Anfang an. Offizieller Beginn 16 Uhr, Schlossplatz, Stuttgart

Nach ca. 20 Minuten fordert die Polizei die linken und muslimischen Randalierer 2-3 Mal auf, zu ihrem Mahnwachenplatz (Karlsplatz) zu gehen. Trotz mehrmaliger Drohung von Seiten der Polizei, die Randalierer in Beugehaft zu nehmen, passierte nichts. Die Polizeileitung argumentierte, wegen der Veranstaltung keine Massenschlägerei zu wollen. Nun, dann wird die Antifa in Zukunft jede ihr missliebige Veranstaltung boykottieren können. Zumal der Aufforderung der Polizei nach Verlassen des Platzes anscheinend nicht nachgekommen werden muss.

Die Veranstaltung soll laut Veranstalter erst abgesagt werden. Und nur eine 10-minütige Rede gehalten werden. Mehrere Teilnehmer sagten ihren Auftritt ab. Darunter auch eine Musikgruppe. Die Angst war durchaus nachvollziehbar.

Um 16.40 Uhr fangen dann die Redner unter massivem Störfeuer der Linken und der Muslime an. Es sprechen Nassim Ben Iman, Michael Mannheimer, ein Herr von Pax Europa und Robert Spencer.

Wir wollen vor die Bühne, um die Redner sehen zu können. Die Polizei verbietet uns auf Nachfrage, die Redner von vorne sehen zu dürfen. Wir müssen so von der hinteren, rechten Seite die Veranstaltung verfolgen (nächstes Foto). Das Bild oben (mit Michael Mannheimer u.a.) konnte ich nur deshalb machen, weil ich kurz vor die Polizeireihe trat.

Als wir massiv von jungen Muslimen beleidigt wurden, mussten nicht etwa die Provokateure das Feld räumen, sondern wir, nach Aufforderung durch die Polizei und ca. zehn Meter zurückweichen. Dies wiederholte sich dann sogar noch einmal. Was für ein fatales Signal für die Täter, aber auch für die Opfer.

Ein Mann haut mir an den Oberarm, ein Polizist steht daneben und behauptet wider besseren Wissens nichts gesehen zu haben. Ich bitte ihn, den Mann zur Mäßigung zu rufen, der Polizist daraufhin: „Sie liegen ja nicht auf dem Boden und schreien“, was ich denn wolle! Ich merkte an, ob man denn erst auf dem Boden liegen müsse, um einen Schläger in die Schranken weisen zu dürfen.

Während der Reden flogen Eier und rote Farbbeutel gegen mehrere Teilnehmer, welche ihr Ziel auch teilweise fanden. Auch spitze Stöcke, rote Fahnen, Flaschen, Glas, Dosen, Müll und ein Aschenbecher aus Stahl flogen in Richtung Bühne und darüber hinaus in die Redner und die Zuhörer. Ein Aschenbecher aus Stahl traf eine Teilnehmerin von hinten am Bein.

Ich zog mir meine Handschuhe an, um evtl. auf mich zufliegende Gegenstände schmerzfreier abwehren zu können. Daraufhin schrie hinter mir ein Mann: “Achtung, der will gleich zuschlagen, er zieht sich Handschuhe an.” Das schlimme daran, der Polizist vor mir griff dies auch als Bedrohung auf. Nachdem ein paar Geschosse auch neben ihm niedergingen, verstand er mein Handeln.

Die Veranstaltung wurde auch durch Trillerpfeifen, Megafone, Geschrei, Morddrohungen, beleidigende Gesten und Worte gestört. Eine Frau entblößte sich kurzzeitig und zeigte ihre blanke Brust. Der Hass in den Augen und das Geschrei war unvorstellbar groß.

Gegen Ende der Veranstaltung um 17.30 Uhr wollten wir den Ort verlassen. Die Extremisten wollten uns aber nicht gehen lassen und kesselten uns ein. Die Polizei wollte, dass wir gehen. Wir auch, was aber angesichts des Drohpotenzials eher unvernünftig erschien. Wir versuchten es dennoch, und wurden wenige Meter nach Verlassen des Kessels von Radikalen aufgehalten. Ein Mitglied der Aktionsgruppe für verfolgte Christen wurde von mindestens drei Frauen bespuckt, ein junger Mann stahl ihm seine Mütze. Zwei junge Männer forderten ihn wiederholt auf, sich mit ihm zu schlagen.

Ich fotografierte die Szene und wurde sofort lautstark angegangen. Ich flüchtete in Richtung des Polizeikessels. Die Meute hinter mir, erwartete ich, dass mich die Polizisten, welche die Szene genau beobachtet hatten, hinter sich lassen würden. Mein pro Israel-Pullover war auch zusätzlich Hinweis genug, zu welcher Seite ich gehörte. Stattdessen machte ich zunächst Bekanntschaft mit einem Schlagstock, den ein Polizist gezielt gegen meinen Bauch einsetze. Nachdem ich lautstark sagte, dass ich massiv bedrängt werde, ließen mich die Polizisten widerwillig durch.

Wieder im Kessel baten wir die Polizei, uns Schutz zu geben. Ein Einsatzleiter sagte, dass Personenschutz nur ganz wenige Leute bekommen würden. Wir sollten uns ein Taxi rufen.

Unsere Autos standen in der Nebenstraße und so wäre es im Bereich des Möglichen gewesen, uns zu begleiten. Auch hätte die Polizei ihre Drohung gegenüber den Gegen-Demonstranten wahr machen können und sie in Sicherungsverwahrung nehmen können. Die nötige Hundertschaft inklusive Reiterstaffel war anwesend.

Es wurde uns dann allen Ernstes vorgeschlagen, einzeln den Platz zu verlassen und dies, nachdem die Polizei vor wenigen Minuten sehen musste, was mit einem unserer Mitglieder und mir geschehen war. Schließlich wagten wir zwei einen erneuten „Ausbruchversuch“ und „entkamen“ in entgegengesetzter Richtung zu unserem Parkplatz. Ein Linker versuchte uns noch zu verfolgen, ließ dann aber von uns ab. Gegen 18.30 Uhr fanden sich alle vier Aktionsgruppenmitglieder wieder beim Parkhaus ein.

Posted in Christenverfolgung, Counterjihad, Freedom of Speech/Redefreiheit, Islam, Islamisierung, Islamkritik, Pax Europa/BPE, Stuttgart June 2011 | Tagged: , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Islamkritik in Österreich – Blubb, blubb, blubb,….

Posted by paulipoldie on June 3, 2011

Danke an SOS Heimat

SOS Österreich legt sich selbst hohe Maßstäbe auf, versucht wissenschaftlich vorzugehen. Deshalb hat der Autor dieser Zeilen einen Artikel in „Die Presse“ in ein Plastiksackerl gelesen und sich unter der Badewanne angehört. (Dieses Experiment kann weltweit unter den gleichen Kriterien wiederholt werden)
Das Ergebnis:

Blubb! Blubb! Blubb!

Damit wäre der „Inhalt“ von Das weite Netzwerk der kritischen Islamexperten (Printausgabe vom 01.06.2011) auch schon wiedergegeben.
Michael Fleischhacker dürfte nicht informiert gewesen sein. Denn zu so einer schwachen, schlecht recherchierten Story hätte er niemals seinen Sanktus gegeben.

Das dürfte auch der Grund sein, warum die Online- Ausgabe aus Scham wieder aus dem Netz entfernt wurde. DiePresse

Doch es beweist sich immer wieder, wie gut SOS-ÖSTERREICH vernetzt ist, denn eine aufmerksame Leserin (eine unerschöpfliche Quelle an Informationen) hat den gut bezahlten Inhalt – der eher einem durchschnittlichen Hauptschulaufsatz gleicht – im Cache gefunden.
(Danke für die Mithilfe!)

In Österreich gibt es eine Reihe von Persönlichkeiten, die als Islamexperten in die Öffentlichkeit drängen und Kritik an der Islamischen Glaubensgemeinschaft üben. Eine Vorstellung der wichtigsten Vertreter.

Wien. Ende der 1990er-Jahre arbeitete Anas Schakfeh, langjähriger Präsident der Islamischen Funktion lehnte er einen Bewerber ab – er hatte den entsprechenden Sprach- und Schreibtest nicht bestanden. „Es war einfach die schwache Grammatik“, erinnert sich Schakfeh heute.

Wie man weiß, legen ORF und IGGiÖ sonst IMMER größten Wert auf beste Sprach- und Schreibkenntnisse ihrer Mitarbeiter und Günstlinge, siehe

Dem Bewerber von damals hat diese Ablehnung offenbar nicht geschadet. Amer Albayati wird heute in Medien als Experte für Islam, Terror und arabische Politik herumgereicht. Seine Qualifikation dafür? Ein nicht abgeschlossenes Studium der Theaterwissenschaft in der ehemaligen DDR.
Parallelen zur einer talentlosen arbeitslosen deutschen Schauspielerin (Sprecherin der IGGiÖ) sind zufällig. Dass Albayati aus der DDR kommt macht die Kritik für Rusen Aksak nur noch schlimmer. Hat die Stasi doch erwiesenermaßen die Lockerbie- Attentäter ausgebildet (Quelle: History Channel).Also soll Albayati bitte dieses Gedankengut auch in seinem Herzen tragen. Die SPÖ macht es ja auch!
Dennoch wird regelmäßig seine Expertise eingeholt, insbesondere von Medien, Blogs und Gruppierungen, die gemeinhin als islamkritisch gelten. Was ihn dort besonders attraktiv macht: seine offene Kritik an der IGGiÖ und deren (noch) amtierendem Präsidenten Anas Schakfeh.

Als Sprecher der Initiative Liberaler Muslime Österreich (Ilmö) versuchte er zuletzt sogar, die Anerkennung als eigene Glaubensgemeinschaft zu erkämpfen. Blasphemie!!! Und: Gemeinsam mit dem Wiener Akademikerbund präsentierte er ein sogenanntes „Wiener Integrationsmanifest“ – darin wurde unter anderem gefordert, dass Arbeitgeber Muslime diskriminieren dürfen sollen.
Das Manifest wird auf SOS Österreich zur Verfügung gestellt. Forderung: Integration, gutes Benehmen. Das ist purer Rassismus! Immerhin, am Ende distanzierte sich die Ilmö doch von dem Papier.

Kampf um „Halal“-Geschäft

Albayati ist nur einer von vielen sogenannten Islamexperten, die in die Medien drängen. Und die ihre Expertise nicht unbedingt aus einer fachlichen Qualifikation heraus begründen.
Wer ein Experte ist, bestimme ich
Zu dieser Gruppe gehört auch Günther Ahmed Rusznak, ein Konvertit aus dem oberösterreichischen Traun und – so wie Albayati – erklärter Gegner von IGGiÖ und Anas Schakfeh. Er führte mit seinem Verein Islamisches Informations- und Dokumentationszentrum Österreich (IIDZ) zahlreiche Prozesse gegen die IGGiÖ, wollte sie sogar unter Kuratel stellen lassen. Daneben ist er im Geschäft mit „Halal“-Zertifikaten aktiv. Der Handel mit islamisch korrekten Lebensmitteln gilt als Wachstumsmarkt. In Österreich war die IGGiÖ exklusiv für diese Zertifizierungen zuständig – ehe Rusznak ein eigenes Zertifikat entwickelte. Und damit ins internationale Halal-Geschäft einstieg.
Fakt ist: An Rusznak gibt es viel zu kritisieren. Doch von der IGGiÖ wird er bis auf das Blut bekämpft. Hat er doch deren Monopol (als ob es keine offenen und versteckten Subventionen von der SPÖ gäbe) im Geschäft gebrochen. Weiters deckt er – aus Eigennutz – „unkonventionelle“ Machenschaften in der ehemals arabischen Glaubensgemeinschaft auf. Ob Rusznak in einem anderen Land noch am Leben wäre?
Seinen Kampf gegen die IGGiÖ führte er weiter. Unter anderem auch, weil ihm die Muslime-Vertretung die Mitgliedschaft verweigerte. „Er schimpfte, prozessierte viele Male gegen die Glaubensgemeinschaft“, sagt Integrationsbeauftragter Omar al-Rawi, „und wollte zur gleichen Zeit eine formale Anerkennung als Muslim durch die Glaubensgemeinschaft haben.“
Reicht etwa nicht die Schahada, das islamische Glaubensbekenntnis um Muslim zu sein?

Als Islamexpertin bezeichnet sich auch Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff. Sie erlebte als Kind die islamische Revolution im Iran mit, für sie ein „verstörendes Erlebnis“ Stimmt, diese Frau ist aber überempfindlich!.
Das ist auch der Grund, warum die Diplomatentochter, die selbst eine diplomatische Ausbildung genoss, laufend Vorträge über die Gefahren einer Islamisierung Europas hält. Unter anderem hielt sie auch „Islam“-Seminare für die Parteiakademie der FPÖ. Die brachten ihr im Februar 2011 eine erstinstanzliche Verurteilung wegen „Herabwürdigung religiöser Lehren“ ein – sie hatte den Propheten Mohammed der Pädophilie bezichtigt.
Wie wir mittlerweile wissen, stimmt dieser Ausdruck nicht ganz. Der „Prophet“ hat ja nicht nur ein Kind, sondern auch Frauen (erwiesen) vergewaltigt. Also träfe eher der Tatbestand der Verharmlosung zu!

Star in islamkritischen Foren
Insbesondere in Onlineforen polemischer Islamkritik wird sie als Star gefeiert – so wurden ihr Verfahren und das entsprechende Urteil lang und breit thematisiert und kommentiert.

Polemik: Polemisieren heißt, gegen eine (bestimmte andere) Ansicht zu argumentieren. Der Polemiker sucht nicht zwingend den Konsens, sondern versucht im rhetorischen Wettstreit seinen Argumenten zum Durchbruch zu verhelfen (Quelle: Wikipedia)

Sowas. Ich habe da von einem Buch gehört …
…allerdings wird da weniger auf Rhetorik als auf nackte Gewalt und deren Verherrlichung gesetzt.

Die ehemalige Botschaftsmitarbeiterin, die in mehreren arabischen Ländern tätig war, hat auch eine eigene Internetpräsenz namens „Mission Europa. Netzwerk Karl Martell“. Darauf ist sie bestrebt, eine paneuropäische Antwort auf die „Gefahr durch den Islam“ zu finden.
Seit Neuestem scheint sie auch ihre Fühler in die westliche Hemisphäre auszustrecken. In aktuellen E-Mails finden sich Verweise auf „ACT! For America“ – eine Organisation, die von einer libanesischen Christin namens Brigitte Gabriel gegründet wurde. Auch sie wurde in jungen Jahren (durch den Libanesischen Bürgerkrieg) traumatisiert und ist heute ein Aktivposten der evangelikalen Rechten in den USA.
Immer diese aufmüpfigen Weiber.
Es hat schon seinen Grund, warum der Islam Gewalt gegen Frauen wünscht erlaubt. Von evangelikal kann bei ACT! For America keine Rede sein. Die Organisation steht jeder Konfession offen.
Der Versuch, seine Gegner zu Fundamentalisten zu stempeln, ist so alt wie erfolglos. Siehe FPÖ. Siehe Wiener Akademikerbund. Christian Zeitz wurde als christlicher Fundamentalist abgestempelt.

Sabaditsch-Wolff ist aber auch außerhalb des Internets gut vernetzt. Unter anderem sitzt sie im Präsidium des Wiener Akademikerbundes.

DiePresse ist ein Medium, das auch der islamkritischen Stimme zuhört. Was sich also die Redakteure bei diesem schwachen Bericht gedacht haben, steht im Halbmond in den Sternen.

Über den Autor Rusen Timur Aksak gibt es außer ein paar ähnlich schwachen Artikel wenig zu sagen.
Am ehesten spricht ein kommentarloser Vergleich für sich:

        

.
Anmerkung:

Der Autor dieses Presse-Artikels, Rusen Timur Aksak, dürfte sich für seine Recherchen hauptsächlich auf unseren Blog informiert haben – natürlich benutzte er hierbei nur sein linkes Auge!
Ein typischer Daumen-Unten-Drücker auf SOS!!!

Posted in Österreich, Counterjihad, Freedom of Speech/Redefreiheit, Islam, Islamisierung, Islamkritik, Islamophobia, Sharia | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Robert Spencer Confronts the Warriors of Darkness in Stuttart

Posted by paulipoldie on June 3, 2011

Video courtesy of Europenews and KitmanTV

Update:

Report by Robert Spencer, Jihadwatch.org

Thursday afternoon I spoke in Stuttgart, Germany at the invitation of the human rights group Pax Europa. The event was well advertised, and so the thuggish Leftist/Islamic supremacist alliance mobilized and was out in full force.

About 1000 Antifa protesters showed up, banging drums, holding signs with the usual accusations of racism and “Islamophobia,” blowing whistles, and menacing people who came out for the Pax Europa event. There were also about 500 German police on hand in riot gear. The Pax Europa organizers told me, “This is all for you” — because they had publicized that I would be there. One young man came up to me as I was standing right in front of a line of German police and said, “You’re lucky there are so many police here today.”

Pax Europa had planned a full program featuring Middle Eastern Christian musicians, a Coptic Christian activist, and others, so as to highlight the hollowness of the Islamic supremacist narrative of Muslim victimhood and anti-jihadist racism. But the police ordered the Pax Europa organizers to drastically reduce the scope of their event. Everyone was restricted to ten minutes only. Several participants opted not to appear, in light of the manifest danger. Antifa people were attacking supporters of Pax Europa. I saw several individuals being chased by rabid Leftist gangs. At least one man went to the hospital.

The police used loudspeakers to call on Antifa twice to disperse, as Pax Europa had lawfully reserved the space for their event. The Antifa people responded only by moving forward, chanting slogans, banging their drums, and holding aloft the usual Leftist kitsch — Che Guevara, the hammer and sickle, the Palestinian flag, signs denouncing Islamophobia, etc. The police moved them back a bit but did not ask them again to disperse, and allowed the Pax Europa event to begin.

It was an incredible din. We had loudspeakers that appeared to be able to reach the considerable crowd behind the protesters, but the Antifa thugs did all they could to drown us out: the drums got louder, the vuvuzelas came out, they were blowing whistles, and of course they were screaming and yelling.

They started throwing things: bottles, eggs, excrement and more. One bottle narrowly missed the Coptic activist’s head and crashed onto the stage — other bottles crashed at our feet. Several speakers were hit with eggs. The manure they threw was all over the stage floor.

I stood right in front (they missed me; I dodged a few projectiles) and watched them as they screamed and gestured and threw things — it was like looking into the pit of hell. Here were young people passionately committed to their cause and believing it to be that of justice and freedom, and they are eager and willing useful idiots for the most radically intolerant ideology on the planet. So when my turn came to speak, I addressed them, and told them just that. I told them they wouldn’t like what happened to them when their friends took power, but by then it would be too late.

And it may be already, for Europe. But I was glad to be there yesterday, and to stand against what was so obviously a force for oppression, hatred, and evil.

Hier die deutsche Übersetzung (danke an Denker, PI)

Konfrontation in Deutschland

Am Donnerstag Nachmittag habe ich auf Einladung der Menschenrechtsorganisation Pax Europa in Stuttgart, Deutschland gesprochen. Die Veranstaltung war gut beworben, wodurch die aggressive Links/Islamische Rassistenallianz mobil gemacht hat und in voller Stärke ausgerückt ist.

Ungefähr 1000 Antifa-Demonstranten sind aufgetaucht, haben getrommelt, Schilder mit den üblichen Rassismus- und Islamophobieanschuldigungen vorgezeigt, Trillerpfeifen geblasen und Menschen bedroht, die zur Veranstaltung von Pax Europa gekommen waren. Es waren auch ca. 500 deutsche Polizeibeamte in Panzeranzügen vor Ort in Bereitschaft. Die Veranstalter von Pax Europa haben mir gesagt „Dies alles ist nur für Sie“ – weil sie bekannt gemacht haben, dass ich anwesend sein werde. Als ich gerade vor einer deutschen Polizeikette stand, kam ein junger Mann zu mir hoch und sagte, „Sie haben Glück, dass heute so viel Polizei hier ist.“

Pax Europa hat ein volles Programm geplant: mit christlichen Musikern aus dem Nahen Osten, einen koptisch-christlichen Aktivisten und vielen anderen, um damit die leeren Worthülsen der islamischen Rassisten hervorzuheben, die von moslemischer Opferrolle und Anit-Jihad-Rassismus schwafeln. Aber die Polizei hatte die Pax-Europa-Veranstalter angewwiesen, den Umfang ihrer Veranstaltung drastisch zusammenstreichen. Jedem wurden nur 10 Minuten zugestanden. Mehrere Teilnehmer haben angesichts deroffenkundigen Bedrohungen entschieden, nicht teilzunehmen. Antifa-Mitglieder haben Helfer von Pax Europa angegriffen. Ich habe mehrere Personen gesehen, die von Links-Trupps gejagt wurden. Mindestens eine Person musste ins Krankenhaus.

Die Polizei verwendete Lautsprecher, um die Antifa zweimal aufzufordern, ihre Versammlung aufzulösen, da Pax Europa diesen Platz rechtmäßig für ihre Veranstaltung reserviert hatte. Die Antwort der Antifa-Menge war lediglich ein Vorwärtsmarschieren, Parolen skandieren, Trommeln und das Emporheben von Nullachtfünfzehn-Links-Kitsch: Che Guevara, Hammer und Sicher, Palästinenserfahnen, Schilder die Islamophobie brandmarken, usw. Die Polizei hatte sie zwar ein wenig zurückgedrängt, aber sie nicht mehr ersucht, ihre Versammlung aufzulösen, und hatte dann für den Beginn der Pax-Europa-Veranstaltung ihr OK gegeben.

Es war ein unbeschreiblicher Lärm. Wir hatten Lautsprecher, die normalerweise in der Lage waren, die beachtliche Menge hinter den Demonstranten zu erreichen, aber die Antifa-Schläger unternahmen alles Mögliche, um uns zu übertönen: die Trommeln wurden lauter, die Vuvuzelas wurden hervorgeholt und Trillerpfeifen geblasen und selbstverständlich haben sie geschrieen und gebrüllt.

Jetzt haben sie begonnen, mit Gegenständen zu werfen: Flaschen, Eier Exkremente und vieles mehr. Eine Flasche hat nur knapp den Kopf des koptischen Aktivisten verfehlt und ist auf der Bühne zerschellt – andere Flaschen zerschellten vor unseren Füßen. Mehrere Sprecher wurden von Eiern getroffen. Der Stallmist, den sie geworfen hatten, lag über den ganzen Bühnenboden verteilt.

Ich stand ganz vorne (sie haben mit verfehlt; ich bin einigen Geschossen ausgewichen) und beobachtete sie, wie sie geschrieen, gestikuliert und Gegenstände geworfen haben – es war wie der Blick in den Abgrund der Hölle. Hier waren junge Leute, die heißblütig ihrem Ideal verpflichtet sind und glauben, es wäre das Ideal von Gerechtigkeit und Freiheit, und zugleich sind sie eifrige und willige nützliche Idioten für die radikalste und intoleranteste Ideologie auf der Welt. Als nun ich für meine Rede an der Reihe war, habe ich mich an sie gewandt und ihnen genau das gesagt. Ich habe ihnen gesagt, dass sie all das nicht mögen werden, was passieren wird, wenn ihre Freunde die Macht übernommen haben, aber dann ist es bereits zu spät.

Und es könnte bereits jetzt zu spät für Europa sein. Aber ich war froh, dass ich gestern dabei war, und mich dem entgegengestellt habe, was so offensichtlich die Macht der Unterdrückung, des Hasses und des Bösen ist.

Posted in Counterjihad, Freedom of Speech/Redefreiheit, Human Rights - menschenrechte, Islam, Islam - What can we do? Was können wir tun?, Islamisierung, Stuttgart June 2011 | Tagged: , , , , | 2 Comments »

Political Islam is a greater danger than Hitler was

Posted by paulipoldie on December 29, 2010

Wednesday, 22 December 2010,
“Political Islam is a greater danger than Hitler was”. Trento at the Assises contre l’Islamization in Paris
by Nidra Poller

Efforts to kill the anti-Islamization Congress in the bud not only failed, they provided an “excuse” for Agence France Presse to cover the event. An article in which the anonymous “journalist” admits that at least 800 people attended the all-day Congress, was headlined “Demonstration against the anti-Islam colloquium.” There were, reportedly, no more than 200 demonstrators. Apparently no high profile personalities led the charge against the anti-Islamization event, which was closely protected by a no man’s land of several hundred meters and a cordon sanitaire of policemen who, according to the AFP release, “filtered” people at the entry. So far the AFP release has been picked up by three of the four major national dailies: Le Parisien, Le Figaro, and Libération.

Paris mayor, Bertrand Delanoë and the 12tharrondissement police chief resisted pressure from a long list of leftwing parties and pro-Islamization organizations. However, two days before the event, the police department issued a solemn warning to organizers and speakers who, they claim, have been associated in the past with “initiatives” that disturb the peace. Agents present in the meeting hall would be attentive to any statement that might cross the line, for which speakers would be answerable in the French courts.

No solemn warning was addressed to the demonstrators. One of the participating organizations, Euro-Palestine, spearheads the BDS campaign here in France. Commandos film their illegal operations in shops and supermarkets and proudly post the videos on their site: http://www.europalestine.com/ Their call to oppose the “islamophobe fascists” on December 18thapparently didn’t generate much enthusiasm among their islamophile fascist fans.

Mouloud Aounit, president of MRAP [movement against racism and for friendship among the people], interviewed this morning on the highbrow France culture (state-owned) radio station, declared that “these organizations” –associated with the anti-Islamization Congress–have been belching hatred for Muslims on their sites. “We know,” intoned Aounit, “that violent words lead to violent acts.”

STOP RIGHT THERE. Isn’t this the point where the handful of protestors and the hefty audience of today’s momentous event come to a meeting of the minds? Let’s hear that again: violent words lead to violent acts. And the Islamization of our society is marked, precisely, by an intolerable level of violence. And this violence is fomented by the hatred of Others inscribed in Islam. The violent words preached in far too many mosques explain why Europeans are becoming “intolerant” of the craze for mosque construction. Oskar Freysinger, initiator of the Swiss minaret ban referendum, was greeted, according to the AFP release, like a hero.

Aounit was followed, on France Culture, by a police official who explained that the pork and wine street party planned for the Goutte d’Or neighborhood on June 18thwas banned because it was likely to disturb the peace. On the contrary, he said, the anti-Islamization Congress is held indoors. It is discreet. There was no big poster campaign. The document announcing the event is rather moderate. So authorities decided to respect the right of assembly and free expression.

Isn’t that the point? The other big Islamic issue this week is Muslim street prayers. Maxime Lépante of Riposte Laïque, major organizer of today’s Congress, has been posting videos of the prayers all year. They finally came to the attention of the general public when Marine LePen, daughter of the retiring president of the Front National, compared them to an “occupation” of our territory. (I’m covering this story for Family Security Matters here http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.8167/pub_detail.asp). A pork and wine street party in a [Muslim?] neighborhood of Paris would be offensive, but hundreds of prostrate Muslims praying in the streets of a [French?] neighborhood of Paris is not? Pork and wine are provocative but “allahu akhbar” isn’t?

For a variety of practical reasons I was not able to attend  the anti-Islamization meeting… which is why I am here to inform you now, as the participants file out into a snowstorm. I will have inside information in the coming days. My attempts to follow the debates online were stumped but I see from readers’ comments on newspaper websites that many people were successful. I’m told that there were five thousand visits to the site.

And we can be proud that our friend Tom Trento (Florida Security Council) was quoted in the AFP release: “All the speakers focused on the ‘dangers’ of Islam. An American militant, Tom Trento, declared—according to the French translation of his speech projected on screen, that ‘political Islam’ is a greater danger than Hitler was.”

Speaking of “political Islam,” the UOIF is listed among the organizations that took part in today’s protest against the “Assises.” The UOIF is known to be a Muslim Brotherhood front.

We don’t intend to wait for proof that these guys are worse than Hitler!

Posted in Conference Reports, Counterjihad, Islam, Islam - What can we do? Was können wir tun?, Islamization, Paris 2010 | Leave a Comment »

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff Speaks At The Counterjihad Paris Conference

Posted by paulipoldie on December 28, 2010

International Civil Liberties Alliance reports:

See more videos from the conference at Bivuac-Id.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am delighted to be here in Paris, the birthplace of modern European secular governance. And I am especially delighted to have been invited here by Gandalf, who founded the Alliance to Stop Sharia. Gandalf has been instrumental in shifting the focus of the European Counterjihad from Islam as a religion to the evils of sharia law.

Have you been accused of being an Islamophobe? A nazi? A xenophobe? A bigot? A misunderstander of Islam (copyright R. Spencer)? Have you been verbally attacked by well-meaning friends who belong either to the Leftist/Liberal spectrum and believe in the Religion of Respect and Anything Goes, or who in principle agree with you, but are sooo very afraid for you and suggest that you stop what you’re doing to stay alive. (What does that tell us about the Religion of Peace?)

I think I can safely assume that most of you, if not all, have at one point or another been subjected to some or all of the aforementioned accusations. I can certainly testify to that. But I can also tell you that I have been hauled into court to face trial for saying what I believe is the truth; a truth that many, especially those of the ruling elite, do not like to hear. Sadly, it seems that in a discussion, when one side has no real argument, he or she resorts to personal attacks. “This woman [as if I didn’t have a name!], she is a hate preacher. She can’t say that! She may be right, but she can’t say that!” Can’t say what? That sharia law is contrary to any of our secular laws? That its legal provisions include gender apartheid as well as killing of those who leave Islam or exercise the right to free speech. That sharia prescribes amputation of limbs and crucifixion even though Article 5 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights postulates that “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Well, guess what? That is precisely what was eventually found in the charges!

In fall 2009, I was asked by the largest Austrian opposition party to hold a three-part seminar on the topic of Islam and the Islamization of Europe. I did this by quoting from the Quran, the hadith, the sunna. I also quoted well-known Muslim politicians like Erdogan, Ghadafi, Arafat, or the former Algerian prime minister. Little did I or the attendants know at the time that a young journalist had infiltrated and recorded the first two seminars without my knowledge. The left-wing magazine then decided to report me to the authorities, who in turn charged me with incitement to hatred. Let me quote the relevant paragraph:

By virtue of § 283 of the StGB, a person is deemed culpable of incitement:

(1) who incites or instigates in a manner liable to jeopardise public order an inimical act against a church or religious community established in the country or against a group determined by their affiliation to such a church or religious community, or to a race, people, tribe or state, or

(2) who agitates against or insults in a manner defamatory to human dignity or endeavours to condemn one of the groups defined in para. (1).

The crime is liable to a term of imprisonment of up to two years.
The outcry among the ruling elite in Austria was ear-splitting. High-ranked politicians, bishops, rabbis, and imams were asked to comment about the contents of a seminar they had never attended. A well-known Muslim university professor, asked by the magazine to analyze some of my controversial statements, even came to the conclusion that I am just like Osama Bin Laden!

In a matter of hours, my personal life was turned upside down. Some of my friends distanced themselves from by asking me to stay away from gatherings where Muslims may have shown up. The media completely ignored me and found the story of a Kosovar family blackmailing the government into granting them humanitarian asylum, after the umpteenth denial of the same, more interesting and captivating. “We do not see the need to report the idiocies of this woman [again, no name],” one liberal left-wing newspaper answered a curious enquirer. What does it matter that the Kosovar family broke the law and that I merely quoted the Quran? You can’t say that!

Interestingly enough, instead of silencing me, the magazine’s questionable actions have made me popular. All of a sudden, many people were outraged by what had happened to me and wanted to hear my side of the story. However, no one in Austria wanted to hear me; it was the Americans who were shocked, which was not surprising given the provisions of the 1st amendment of the US Constitution guaranteeing absolute freedom of speech, something we Europeans are in sore need of. I was invited to speak at the launch of the Freedom Defense Initiative, at the National Conference of ACT! for America, both in Washington DC. I spoke in Berlin at a rally for the Citizens’ Movement Pax Europa, as well as at the European Freedom Initiative rally in Amsterdam. The Danish Free Press Society in Copenhagen wanted to hear my take on freedom of speech. Just two weeks ago, I conveyed to my Israeli hosts the importance of Israel in the fight against Islamization. And today I am here in Paris to tell you about my trial. I was not silenced, nor will they ever succeed in silencing me!

By November 28, 2010, the member states of the European Union were required to implement an innocuous-sounding legal provision known as the “Framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia”, or, more fully, the “Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law.” According to the final article of the Framework Decision, “Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by 28 November 2010.”

Why does this matter to the cause of free speech in Europe?

If you read the full text of the Framework Decision (which may be found in the legislative section of the EU’s website), you will learn that “Each Member State shall take the measures necessary… to ensure that the following intentional conduct is punishable”. Such “intentional conduct” includes “conduct which is a pretext for directing acts against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin.”

Based on what has recently happened to Geert Wilders and me — and earlier to Gregorius Nekschot, Jussi Halla-aho, and numerous others — we can all guess who will be punished under this provision of the Framework Decision: those who criticize Islam.

It was not until October that a court date was set for my case. I had to discover this fact in the press — in NEWS, the same left-wing magazine that brought the original complaint against me. I was not officially notified of my hearing date until several days later.

The evidence used against me at my trial several weeks ago was a transcript of a tape of my lecture, provided to the court by the same socialist magazine. It included words that were not spoken by me, and words that were not spoken in public, which therefore were not a violation of the law.

But my case is not really about the law. It is a political trial, and like the trials of Geert Wilders and Jussi Halla-aho, it is intended to silence someone who speaks out against the barbaric nature of sharia law.

Above all else, it is intended to discourage anyone who might consider following in my footsteps. The oligarchs who rule Europe are determined to prevent any frank discussion among their citizens of Islam and its legal doctrines.

These are the methods of a totalitarian state.

They are more successful than those of the Nazis and the Fascists and the Communists because they are accomplished quietly and peacefully, with no need for concentration camps or gulags or mass graves or the shot in the back of the neck in the middle of the night.

They are surgical strikes executed via our legal systems, and they are quite effective. Between the summary punishment carried out against Theo Van Gogh and the EU Framework Decision applied though our courts, there is no room left for us to maneuver.

We are systematically being silenced.

I am not a victim. I intend to stand up for what is right. I will defend what needs to be defended. Above everything else, I will exercise my God-given right to speak freely about what is happening. Freedom of speech is the single most important freedom we possess.

I am doing this for my daughter, and for her children, for those who will have to live in the world we are now preparing for them. I am doing what our grandparents should perhaps have done during the 1930s, when their own freedoms were under threat.

This is our time. This cup will not pass from us.

I am reminded of a passage in J.R.R. Tolkien’s famous trilogy, The Lord of the Rings.

It is an exchange between Frodo the hobbit and Gandalf the wizard, and it concerns the perilous quest on which Frodo and his friends have been sent.

Frodo says: “I wish it need not have happened in my time.”

Gandalf responds: “So do I, and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”

It is time for us to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.
In speaking these words, I might be subject to arrest. I could be charged under the provisions of the Framework Decision, and extradited to the country that charged me using a European Arrest Warrant, escorted by the European Gendarmerie.

This is not an imaginary scenario; it is a very real possibility.

It is true that only a few people are likely to undergo such an ordeal. But it only takes a few people.

How many people have to endure what Mr. Wilders and I are enduring before everyone else gets the message?

How many examples have to be set before the rest of the European population understands the new rules, and is cowed into submission?

And we must remember to whom they will be submitting in the end. They will be submitting to our successors in Europe. They will be submitting to our replacements.

We must remember that the word for submission in Arabic isIslam.

When there are enough Muslims living in Europe — and it doesn’t have to be a majority of the population, just somewhere around fifteen or twenty percent — we will be living under Islamic law, and not the laws that presently govern us.

We will no longer enjoy what constitutional rights remain to us now. Our rights will be completely prescribed and delimited by sharia. Women will become the virtual chattel of men. Christians and Jews will be driven out or forced to convert to Islam. Atheists and homosexuals will be killed.

The European Union would consider these words to be “hate speech”. Under the Framework Decision, they would be classified as “racism and xenophobia”, and I could be prosecuted for saying them.

But they are in fact the simple truth.

Anyone can verify them by studying history. Anyone who chooses can read the Koran and the hadith and the Sunna of the Prophet.

Widely available official treatises on Islamic law confirm that my description is not “hate speech”, but a plain and accurate reading of the tenets of Islamic law.

It has become obvious that to tell the truth about Islam is now considered “incitement to religious hatred”.

It is now clear that non-Muslims who reveal the tenets of sharia law to the public are “denigrating religious teachings”.

If we meekly accept these rules, then we are acquiescing in the imposition of sharia law in our own nations. And I, for one, will not sit silently while this happens.

I don’t want my daughter to live under sharia.

Our time is short. If you and I do not envision an Islamic future for ourselves, then we must speak out now.

If we wish to preserve the right to speak and publish freely, then we must exercise it now.

I wish this need not have happened in my time. But it has.

We must make full use of the time that remains to us.

Thank you.

Posted in Conference Reports, Counterjihad, Fight back!, Freedom of Speech/Redefreiheit, Islam, Islam - What can we do? Was können wir tun?, Islamization, Paris 2010 | 1 Comment »

The DDL and the EFI Are on the Map!

Posted by paulipoldie on December 2, 2010

The DDL and the EFI Are on the Map!

Below is a detailed summary of the rally for free speech in Amsterdam and the events leading up to it. It was written by Timo, one of the founders of the Dutch Defence League and the head of the Dutch contingent among the organizers of the European Freedom Initiative. During the preparations for the demonstration, Timo was the local liaison with the Amsterdam police and municipal officials.

This report was originally published in Dutch at ICLA website, and has kindly been translated into English by our Dutch correspondent Bolleke.
The DDL and the EFI Are on the Map!

From Creation to Demonstration”

by Timo

Dear members and sympathizers,

I would like to thank everyone who cares about us and in his or her way is committed to the coming of age of the DDL (Dutch Defense League). In addition, sincere apologies for not accurately responding to uncertainties or questions related to issues such as the run-up to the demonstration and the future plans of the DDL.

In August we — some visitors from the EDL forum and some friends who are active in the Counterjihad world — decided to create a movement similar to the English Defense League. Just like distressed citizens of other European countries around us, we also found that it was time for a more active peaceful resistance against the Islamisation of the Netherlands and Europe.

After some preliminary agreements, a plan of action was devised for the development of the DDL: a Charter and a sample of concept statutes were drawn up, and a website and forum were launched to provide a platform to supporters and interested parties, who for the time being could start an exchange of information and temporarily catch potential members. However, before we could start further development, we were approached by other groups from Europe asking us to join a European alliance of like-minded organizations, the European Freedom Initiative. It was to be an umbrella organization with the following affiliated organizations: The English Defense League, Politically Incorrect News (Germany), Citizen’s Movement Pax Europa (Germany), Gates of Vienna, and the International Civil Liberties Alliance.

From within the EFI the DDL was almost immediately asked if it was possible to play a supporting role in setting up a demonstration in Amsterdam. A demonstration for freedom of speech and against the threat of the introduction of sharia law in Europe. A demonstration that would take place in Amsterdam, the most tolerant city in the world, but on the other hand, also the scene of the show trial of Geert Wilders.

Also the EFI would use that day to seal international friendships and it would consider that day as the official kickoff for international cooperation. We decided to slow down the development of the DDL for the time being. We were able to estimate a little in advance that organizing a demonstration would cost a lot of time and energy and therefore it had our priority. The intention was that after the demonstration we would go on and use the time to let the number of forum members grow.

We then reported to the municipality of Amsterdam that in the name of the EFI we had the intention of going to the Museumplein in Amsterdam on 30 October to demonstrate for aforementioned reasons. Because there were indications that many members of the English Defense League were planning to come, communication was initiated directly between the contact person and the responsible parties for the Amsterdam police.

Before a definitive answer from the municipality of Amsterdam came, we were faced with the propaganda machine of René “Backpack” Danen. Through his website, he managed to convince the media that there was going to be an invasion of violent English skinheads. Messages that do well in photo-shooting Netherlands, so the sensational “news” spread fast. The image was formed.

It was not until the end of September that we got permission to go on with the demonstration. Counterdemonstrations were already announced by then, and by then the sound of the upcoming English invasion had also reached the Amsterdam City Hall, and they were somewhat concerned. At the beginning of October we were put in contact with various members of the police in Rotterdam and Amsterdam and invited to a first meeting, and in later stages multiple meetings, to paint the best possible picture of such things as which organizations would be there, what they stand for, how they would travel and what their composition is.

During these discussions, it was made clear that this wasn’t about extreme right-wing groups, but a coalition of distressed citizens from all walks of society. In advance an estimate was made of 2000-5000 people. This seemed to us to be a fair estimate, given the fact that we already had several hundred commitments, and also expected that some positive media attention would provide for additional influx, mainly of Dutch citizens. “If only we could have known better …”.

To keep the topic up-to-date there were interviews and understandings concerning the creation of news items scheduled for the third week of October. Earlier attention to the demonstration would have weakened the impact of the demonstration on the long term, so we decided for a later scheduled media campaign. But broadcasters, newspapers and blogs were already informed of our demonstration by means of two press releases. Also, there was an informal discussion with some journalists about renowned speakers who would attend, such as Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, an activist who like Geert Wilders is being persecuted for “hate speech”. (Hate speech, in this case, means to read verbatim passages from the books of the Koran, the hadith, or Sharia).

It soon became clear to us that the media were not interested in the actual substance of the demonstration nor in the organizations concerned. These were totally taken out of context, and the demonstration was presented as pro-Wilders, organized by the “violent” (read great) EDL. In spite of various attempts on our side through press releases and media appearances of our press officer to present the demonstration in the right way, the media stayed focused on the possible outburst of violence in Amsterdam.


The unwashed quasi-homeless children’s club Antifa (“anti-fascists”) had now, in cooperation with the “AFA” (Anti-Fascist Action) and some migrant organizations, called for violent counter protest over the Internet. Of course, in their eyes no permit was needed. The pressure on Van der Laan (the mayor of Amsterdam) and the police of Amsterdam — and also on us — was rising. Fueled by the media smear campaign against the EDL, the public got the idea that the Museumplein in Amsterdam was going to be a battlefield.

We then worked with the police of Amsterdam in a good and especially pleasant way, and passed on all signals concerning calls of incitement to violence. EFI, and certainly the DDL and EDL, have publicly denounced violence and warned in advance that any person who committed or turned to violence or racism would be removed. With this we made clear to have the best intentions. These contacts were both taking place at a police station in Amsterdam and by telephone.

For the time being it seemed that we could still expect to be at the Museumplein on October 30. Public opinion was not negative at first, although skeptical, but it was felt that we just had the right to demonstrate there as an organization. It gradually dawned on the general public that the violence was being announced from the left side. Antifa panicked and had to make a new move. Van der Laan was informed (by Antifa) about the arrival of hundreds of Dutch hooligans in Amsterdam!
Because in the past problems arose in England with situations like this, an invitation was never sent to any Dutch football supporters’ club whatsoever. The DDL, and also the EFI, has focused on other civil organizations in the Netherlands such as Jewish, Iranian, and gay organizations. Due to the press release issued by Mr. Van der Laan on Wednesday 28 October, whether or not orchestrated by Antifa, the AFCA (Amsterdam Football Club Ajax) hooligans then announced they would defend their city against the invasion of the “extreme right-wing” trash.

A strange thing, because prior to that time, nowhere on the Internet forums or websites of supporters’ associations had there been any calls for a trip to Amsterdam. Moreover, the day before the EFI had sent a report to the police of Amsterdam with a concise summary of signals about the involvement of various risk groups, such as left-wing and right-wing activists, immigrant organizations, and football supporters. It was emphasized that at that time (27 October) there was no indication that any football supporters were going to be there. Also, the DDL, unlike the EDL, had not started out as a small clique of contiguous hardcore football supporters.

On the basis of his own information, Van der Laan decided three days before the event to move our demonstration in order to guarantee our safety. Because this news reached us in the evening, we were unable to attend a meeting until Thursday morning in Amsterdam. We then made it clear that it would be impossible in such a short time to inform participants about a possible move. Because an official review was our only option to still go to the Museumplein, we seriously considered this. However, to submit summary proceedings on Thursday afternoon and then to live in uncertainty for another twenty-four hours would also be too late in case of a negative decision by the judge to adequately inform everyone in time.

The mayor also indicated that he might cancel the whole demonstration. Something we would regret, especially considering the fact that international guests had already booked their hotels. Then on Thursday night it was decided that a preliminary injunction had to be cancelled and we must agree to the transfer. And in the crush of events on Friday we had to notify everyone by means of the Internet and the phone.

Meanwhile, The media were absolutely jam-packed with news items about our demonstration, but the grim atmosphere around it started to scare people away from Amsterdam in droves, including those from abroad. Quite understandable, because we as an organization started worrying about the safety of our participants. However, after proper consultation on Friday 29 October, it became quite clear to us that one could travel fairly safely to the location on the Generatorstraat.
The demonstration itself was quite a strange sensation. Most of the journalists define it as a failure, but making such a determination stems from the fact that the things they had hoped would happen and what they hoped to be able to report did not happen: no recordings of Braveheart 2, but a few handfuls of peaceful citizens who listened to quite engaging speakers. To compensate, the few Englishmen who entered the area were virtually buried under journalists in the frenzy to take a photo of a “skinhead” Englishman.

We ourselves regard the event as a modest success. Of course, we also saw a low turnout and we find it very annoying for those who were not allowed or were deterred in advance from traveling to Amsterdam. On the other hand, if we look at the image the media presented about us, and how they made it difficult for us during the run-up to the demonstration, it is a major achievement that we managed to gather on a field somewhere in the back of an industrial area in the left-Islamic stronghold of the western Amsterdam docklands, surrounded by three times as many journalists as participants.

Another success achieved that day was that our peaceful demonstration has proven that the violence during demonstrations comes from Left in 99% of the cases. The violent announcements from Antifa prior to the demonstration and the fact that of the thirty-four arrests but five were from our side (Note: all five of them were for not being able to present a valid ID card) underpin the above. It’s just unfortunate that the remaining twenty-nine arrests were also linked to our demonstration by the media.
What is also very disappointing is the fact that, despite the massive interest, little has been published in the media about the speeches by, among others, Paul Weston, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, Alain Wagner, and Tommy Robinson, or about the European Freedom Initiative itself. This despite the fact that guests attended the rally from countries as diverse as England, France, Austria, Germany and Norway. A smashed window of a van was apparently more important.

The attitude of the police in both the run-up and on the day itself was praiseworthy. Though there are, of course, questions about why the van carrying Tommy Robinson ended up near an Antifa group (or could this have been designed by the accompanying PownedTV-van who had picked them up at Schiphol?). In addition, a metro station full of riot-addicted immigrants, Antifa idiots, and street youth calling themselves “Ajax-hooligans” (we have been told that the real core membership of Ajax has distanced itself from this action) shouldn’t have departed from Sloterdijk station. It should also be mentioned that the situation was neatly kept under control by the massively presence of a riot police unit.
The DDL and the EFI are now on the map, and this is particularly due to left-oriented people within the media and Antifa circles. We have learned a lot in a short time, and have proven that we do not collapse under heavy pressure. All this would not have been possible without the efforts of the persons concerned, but especially not without the support and confidence that we received from the members on the forum and from other unexpected corners of the country.

What will be the next steps for the DDL? As mentioned previously, we suspended our development until the demonstration took place. At the moment we’re still recovering a bit from the demonstration, because with all the commotion surrounding it, it has made a tremendous impact in the lives of those involved. This weekend [November 6-7] we have scheduled a meeting with some insiders to pick up the thread. In the course of the next week we will come out with the results and about how our organization will be structured.

Other short-term issues we are going to work on are improving the inaccurate image that clings to us (by the majority of the media we were unfortunately seen as racist and violent, and were labeled “extreme right”) and setting up the subgroups suggested by some of you. Some invitations have already been received, and I will be there in person to discuss this in the near future.

We also know that there is a need for a meeting with a number of members, but for the time being we will be careful about this. This does not mean we want to exclude people, but we want to work very selectively: the first threats have come in, and on the advice of the police, but also out of our own discretion, it is not to be handled lightly. The freedom of our employees and members is paramount.

Finally, I would like to raise the subject of Geert Wilders. It was never our intention to link our organization and/or the demonstration directly to Geert Wilders. We understand the fact that he has distanced himself from our demonstration and our organization. An expected outburst of violence would be too easily linked to his political activities by a small army of left-wing reporters with cameras and pens handy. However, we are very proud that we, the DDL and EFI, kept the situation under control and have proven the alarmists wrong.

I greatly appreciate the confidence you placed in the leadership of the DDL, but also, above all, the patience regarding uncertainties about the Dutch Defense League, the demonstration, and the European Freedom Initiative. We will very soon have a more efficient communication system. Also, as a Dutch contact person for the EFI, I will explain in greater detail this initiative, the relevant organizations and individuals.
A deep bow and thanks to everyone who helped, who took the trouble to come to Amsterdam, or who supported us in any other way during these recent events.

Timo (founder and admin, DDL)

Posted in Amsterdam 30.10.10, Counterjihad | Leave a Comment »

NPR, Juan Williams, and Sharia Law

Posted by paulipoldie on November 9, 2010

Posted 11/07/2010 ET

Human Events

NPR’s sacking of Juan Williams was more than the politically correct act du jour.  It was the latest in a series of media and political capitulations to Sharia law.

A central provision of Sharia law is its prohibition against speech that can be construed as “defaming” Islam or the prophet Mohammed.  Where Sharia is practiced and enforced, such “defamation” is a criminal offense that can be punished by death.

In other words, what we in America take for granted as free speech is a capital crime in some areas of the Muslim world.

Islamists around the world are seeking to impose Sharia’s muzzling of free speech on free societies.  The Organization of the Islamic Conference, composed of 56 Islamic states, has won passage of a United Nations resolution calling on countries to criminalize speech that “defames” religion—clearly referring to Islam.  After all, does anyone really expect countries like Saudi Arabia to criminalize speech that “defames” Judaism?

Criminalizing speech that is deemed “defamation” of Islam is tantamount to a backdoor enactment of Sharia law.  The law may have a different name or description, such as prohibiting “hate speech,” but the effect on speech is the same as if Sharia law were in place.

The Netherlands and Austria are two countries where such de facto “Sharia-compliant” laws are in effect.  Dutch Member of Parliament Geert Wilders is currently on trial for publicly criticizing Islam.  Austrian Parliamentarian Susanne Winter was convicted of a similar “crime” in early 2009.  And just last week we were informed that Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, an Austrian who is an ACT! for America member and chapter leader in our expanding international program, will go on trial there for allegedly transgressing the same law.

When newspapers around the world, including most in America, refused to publish the satirical Mohammed cartoons, capitulation to de facto Sharia law occurred.  The ostensible reason was to avoid “offending” or “inflaming” the Muslim world.  The practical effect was a widespread media self-censorship that was every bit as much a compliance with Sharia law as if Sharia law were the actual law of the land.

Some Muslims and Islamic organizations such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) argue that such self-censorship is necessary because without it “Islamophobia” will continue to rise.  But there is more here than meets the eye.

Immediately after Juan Williams’ appearance on The O’Reilly Factor, CAIR swung into action and demanded that NPR “address” what Juan Williams said.

Ibrahim Hooper, CAIR spokesman, appeared on Megyn Kelly’s program on Fox News to defend CAIR’s actions.  Tellingly, he failed to reiterate his comment made in a 1993 article in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, in which he said, “I wouldn’t want to give the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.”

CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad expressed a similar sentiment in 1998 when he was quoted in two California newspapers maintaining that “the Koran should be the highest authority in America.”

In other words, he wants Sharia law, not the Constitution, to be the supreme law of the land.

Contrast Hooper’s statement with one recently made by moderate and reformist Muslim Dr. Tawfik Hamid:

“Organizations like ACT! for America have come into existence because of the very real threat posed to free people everywhere by what some call “radical Islam” or “Islamism.”  Sadly, the response I see from too many in the Muslim world is to reflexively label such efforts as “Islamophobic” rather than [to] conduct a serious evaluation of Islam that asks why so many non-Muslims harbor legitimate fears and concerns.  I believe [that] the Muslim world needs to provide a peaceful understanding of the religion that unambiguously rejects the current mainstream teachings in Islam that promote hatred, discrimination, and violence.  It is the responsibility of Islamic scholars to provide such alternative teaching to Muslims before asking the world to stop engaging in so-called “Islamophobia.”

Hamid’s reference to the harboring of “legitimate fears” by non-Muslims speaks directly to what Juan Williams was expressing.  Don’t shut down free speech.  Instead, we should encourage more speech that candidly addresses the threat of radical Islam and what that threat means to Americans, whether they are Muslim or non-Muslims.

It’s clear that NPR decided to make an example of Juan Williams for crossing a line into the Forbidden Zone of political correctness when he spoke out on the “sensitive” issue of Islam.  But NPR’s action transcends the boundaries of political correctness.  As newspapers did when they self-censored cartoon renderings of the prophet Mohammed, NPR sent an unmistakable message to Islamists worldwide that Sharia law, even when not formally the law of the land, trumps our First Amendment.

Brigitte Gabriel is a terrorism analyst, a New York Best-selling author of “Because They Hate” and “They Must Be Stopped” and president and CEO of ACT for America.org. Guy Rodgers is Executive Director of ACT for America.org.

Posted in Counterjihad, Freedom of Speech/Redefreiheit, Geert Wilders, Islamization, Sharia | Leave a Comment »

“A Revolt From the Top Against Their People”

Posted by paulipoldie on November 6, 2010

Gates of Vienna

The full text of Michael Mannheimer’s speech in Amsterdam

As I mentioned a few days ago, the German journalist Michael Mannheimer gave a speech last Saturday at the rally for free speech in Amsterdam. Mr. Mannheimer spoke at length about the bloody history of Islamic aggression in Europe.

Our regular reader and commenter Heroyalwhyness kindly transcribed all four parts of the video for us. Henrik Ræder Clausen then filled in some of the difficult parts of the text, and edited the result into a more coherent form.

I have further modified their preliminary work by smoothing out some of the irregularities in the English and editing the prose for clarity. The result is below.

Byzantium: The Fall of Constantinople, 1453
Part 1:

Welcome. We are now in the year 2010 in the midst of the biggest threat to Europe in history.

We are in the midst of the third attack of Islam against Europe. The first attack took place shortly after Muhammad died, and the Muslim conquerors conquered Spain, and the Spanish Islamization took six hundred years and ended in 1492 with a big Reconquista. In spite of what in many books is written and written again, despite the “peaceful Cordoba Islam”, the truth was very different.

The truth was that the Muslims killed millions of Christians and Jews and destroyed churches, and it should be known that the second attack of the Ottoman Empire began with the conquest of Constantinople, and ended after the First World War, 1918. During this 455 years of Ottoman attacks against Europe, millions of people, millions of innocent Christians and Jews were killed under unbelievably cruel conditions.

Turkey, as the father of the Ottoman Empire, led altogether twenty-nine wars. Twenty-nine wars against Europe during these 455 years. And it is now undertaking its thirtieth war, because Turkey is now one of the leading Islamic countries in the world, on a par with Iran, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia.

In Turkish political circles they do not speak about Germany as “Germany”. They speak about “West Turkey” already. And we have seen how Erdogan came to Germany like a Caliph who wanted to control everything that is happening, and going on as if he wanted some kind of Islamization. But now we have a far bigger threat than ever in history of Europe. Much bigger even than the threats of Hitler and of communism. The difference is the following:

Hitler had a country of about 75 million people, and Hitler had an overall history of thirteen years in power. But the Muslims have had much greater experience, 1,400 years of Islamization on different fields. They are much better organized. They are worldwide, and they have 1.4 billion people behind them. The consequence of that power of the umma we see everyday. We saw it last time, very dramatically with the Mohammad cartoons in Denmark.

The difference is also that the frontier of this attack doesn’t lie along the borders of Europe. We don’t see the enemy as an enemy. The enemy is among us. The enemy is the system of Islam, and not necessarily the Muslim people. But thus far they are Muslims. In the same way they are fulfilling the main aim of Islam, which is conquering the world, as were the peace-loving among the Germans, who were a majority of 80% during the Hitler system, too.

Even with their lesser numbers they make the rest of Islam, a very bad power, strong. And they make it strong also by failing to criticize the bad things in their religion. Why don’t they criticize it? They don’t criticize it because it brings a death sentence to criticize Islam. This is an order by Mohammed. And this is the only religion in the world that does that; I have been in all religions.

I lived in Buddhist countries sixteen years. I lived in Hindu countries many, many years. I know the Christian and the Jewish. This is unique. No other country has an order to kill those who criticize their religion. And there is another order: killing those who abandon their religion, meaning Islam. So both these things are far and away against the human rights of Europe. The human rights of free speech and the human rights of free choices of human individuals to choose what they want. And this has nothing to do with the freedom of religion, which also involves the freedom having no religion.

Part 2:

[disturbance in the background] Ok, ok, ok… can you please bring this man away?

Some data about the third wave of attack. I will mention now, first, the demographic data:

1945 there were only 645,000 Muslims in Europe

Now in the year 2010 we already have 55 million Muslims, a number which is growing by one million immigrants from Muslim countries every year, and we will even get more by the Lisbon treaties, which demand more, one hundred million. I repeat, one hundred million Muslims by the year 2030. Of all immigrants since 1990, in the twenty years up to today the portion of Muslim immigrants was 90%. This is the information which you cannot read in the newspapers, and you will not hear that from politicians. In Sweden alone, in the capital of Sweden, there are twenty suburbs that have over 70% Muslims; by their increasing numbers, in five years most of them will have 100% Muslims.

The population growth of the Muslims in Europe is unique too. Every ten years, the number of Muslim doubles. This is by far the highest increase of population in history of mankind. This would mean that we would have about 6.5 billion more people worldwide in the year 2020. Thirteen billion people worldwide. We have a birth jihad. Imams in all mosques are demanding that their believers to make as many children as they can. I call it a birth jihad. So you see one of the results is Mohammed is already the first name most selected in Sweden, Norway, England and Holland. So listen, of all newborn, male children in those countries Mohammed is the most frequently given first name.

[Another disturbance.]

Ladies and gentlemen, the new fascism is showing up under the name of anti-fascism. You see that clearly here. The fascistic are the Left and Green parties all over Europe. They betray their own people concerning the facts of Islamization, and they have brought millions of Muslim people into Europe without asking their own peoples. They are betrayers of their own peoples. You have seen here one of the attacks… as have been done over the last ten years.

Part 3:

In Great Britain, in the last thirty years, the Muslim population grew from 82,000 to 2.5 million. That is 40 times more in the last thirty years. In Holland, over 50% of newborns are already Muslims. And in the year 2025, fifty percent of the population will be Muslim. In Belgium, 25% of population is already Muslim and 50% of all newborns are Muslim. In Germany, there is a government paper which says [three] things which I will translate into English.

  • The fall of the German population is unstoppable.
  • The downward spiral is irreversible.
  • In 2050, Germany will be an Islamic State.

This is an internal paper of the German government. You can find it in Google and read it. The social cost and criminal cost are always things which the media and politicians keep secret from their own populations. And so the media behave the same way as if they were oppressed by an outer power. They suppress their data. The real information and the truth, they have themselves controlled the information.

I’ll tell you some interesting facts about the social and criminal costs for Europe. In Switzerland, 80% of all social costs go to the 9% of immigrants. Now, politicians say, “we once installed the social system for keeping the original Swiss people from falling down, but now we just support Muslims.”

In Berlin, Germany — 70% of the intensive criminals in Berlin are Muslim. And listen: 90% of all criminals in Berlin are Muslims. 75% of all Turkish immigrants could not finish school, and 73% of all immigrants don’t work and are supported for life by the German social system. In France, 70% of all prisoners are Muslims but they are only 12% of the population. Ladies and gentlemen, these are facts which nobody can deny. I never was accused by my enemies when talking about the facts ,because it was proved by trial that those facts were right.

[Interruption by security cautioning attendants to move back away from stage for the safety of the speakers. Mr. Mannheimer requests for a policeman on his side — potential altercation not visible on screen]

In Norway, more than 50% of all social benefits go to Muslims. In Sweden €6.7 billion in social costs for Muslims. And their high [inaudible] rates like never before in the history of Sweden, the incidence of rape is now four times bigger than twenty years ago. Parallel to a four times higher Muslim population. In Oslo, in the year 2009, 100% of all rapists were non-indigenous people of Norway — they were Muslims.

The number of no-go areas in Europe is dramatically increasing, with over 1,000 no-go areas already. Imams in all mosques invite their believers not to pay tax anymore to the system, because this will bring the breakdown of Europe, will push it forward. They also pray: kill all homosexuals. They also pray: make as many kids as you can, you can make them and go to the social system. In mosques all over Europe they hold courses on how to get social money.

And, now listen: we have no “immigrant” problem in Europe. We have a problem only with Muslim immigrants. We have no problem with non-Muslim immigrants.

[applause — BRAVO]

And what is never said and never written, never in talk shows on TV or in newspaper, is that in the law of Islam, the Qur’an forbids Muslims under the threat of death to integrate into a non-Muslim country. I cite Qur’an Sura 5, Verse 51: “Oh, believers! Don’t make friends with Christians and Jews who are your neighbors. If you do that, you are no Muslims anymore and you will be treated worse than the unbelievers.” Ladies and gentlemen, this is being prayed in the mosques, which are pushed in the way of many politicians.

Part 4:

In Spain, an imam wrote a book: how to beat your wife properly. This book sold 800,000 copies and it goes back to the Sura for which says to the Muslims to beat their woman.

But, ladies and gentlemen, the real opponents, the real enemies aren’t the Muslims. No Muslims packed up their baggage and came here by foot. They were invited by the politicians by the millions and millions. Never have they asked the people of their countries to have it so. We have four supporters of Islamization. One is politicians. The second are the tripart of the churches. The third are the media, and the fourth are the intellectuals.

I’ll give you some examples. Left-wing and Green politicians always say in their speeches that Europe needs more and more Muslims in order that Europe will survive the next years. This is, ladies and gentlemen, one of the biggest lies in the present day. Because the real reason can be read in the book by Joschka Fischer — he wrote it in 1994 — The Risk Germany.

[ISBN 3462023411 Risiko Deutschland. Krise und Zukunft der deutschen Politik (Sondereinband) Joschka Fischer (Autor)]

They [the Greens] wrote it in order to bring future voters for their party because the native people did not vote the way they wanted in number. Fischer also said in this book that we have to put out our indigenous population and fill it with immigrants so that we can take power. To repeat, a German minister one of the leaders of the Green Party says: “I am happy if Germany disappears from the world map.”

This, ladies and gentlemen is the same as…

[break]

Muslims can beat their daughters very heavily to prevent them from integrating into the Western style in Italy. So, in Germany, in churches make rules that Muslim pupils don’t need to join class excursions from school, don’t need to take part in swimming lessons, and don’t need to take part in the gymnastic lessons. This, ladies and gentlemen is a general attack on indigenous Europeans from highest positions, against their own constitutions. This is a betrayal of most powerful people against their own country, and against the tradition and history of our great and free continent. If nothing else, a revolt from the top against their people.

What can we do against it?

I come now to the end. Accuse them, if you know those who are judged as breaking the law. Accuse him and bring him for trial. I propose that we remember all the names who are giving help and support to the Muslims, for a second Nuremberg trial which must be held in ten or twenty years. This is my deep belief. We cannot let those betrayers, those co-workers with one of the biggest — I say one of the biggest — totalitarian repressive systems, Islam, to get off without paying that which they have to pay.

Don’t vote for those parties who want to bring Muslims to power and bring more Muslims and more and more again to Europe.

Don’t buy those newspapers which lie about the real situation.

And I say, may this day be the beginning of a European and worldwide Reconquista of our Western values, and let us defend these values by all means, and with our lives.

Thank you very much.

 

Posted in Amsterdam 30.10.10, Counterjihad | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.