“In Islam women are free…”

H/T: KGS

Free Speech: Dead Soon in Europe!?

T/P Vlad Tepes

Please take the eight minutes to watch this. It is more than good, it is important.

Dhurka Dhurka jihad

Free Speech: use it or lose it

Yousef al-Qaradawi’s Christmas Message

Everyone knows Yousuf al-Qaradawi, the renowned Salafist spiritual leader and protégé of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood. Qaradawi is notorious for his tirades against the Zionists and their infidel ways, and for his exhortations to fellow Muslims to return to the roots of their faith.

Now, in an amazing Christmas surprise, Yousuf al-Qaradawi has revealed his conversion to Christianity! Vlad Tepes presents his own translation of Sheikh Qaradawi’s message for Christmas 2009:

For a comparative translation, see the original MEMRI video.

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/12/ho-ho-ho.html#readfurther

Wake Up, America!

Pat Condell at his best! A must-see.

transcription: ICLA

Transcript of Pat Condell’s Video: Wake up, America

You remember the cartel of Islamic dictatorships that hijacked the United Nations Human Rights Council don’t you? And then promptly passed a resolution banning the criticism of religion? Yes of course you do!

Well, apparently they’ve decided now that the Universal Declaration of Human rights gives people just a bit too much freedom and dignity for their liking. And so they’ve devised their own Islamic human rights charter which is a bit like Satan getting his own set of pearly gates and about as convincing. Unfortunately the Islamic charter is based on Sharia which is, of course, invalid because it’s God’s law and God doesn’t exist; to claim that he does is extremely offensive to those of us who passionately believe otherwise. It’s a grave insult to our most deeply cherished beliefs , an assault on the very core of our being, no less, and a violation, therefore, of our human rights – isn’t it?. Well, isn’t it?

Now all this would be something of a tiresome joke if not for the fact that this nonsense is beginning to have a real effect on our basic freedoms, certainly here in Europe, and Americans would do well to wake up and pay attention to what’s going on. Ever since the Islamic countries demanded that Western governments make it a crime to criticise Islam, all over Europe blasphemy laws and religious insult laws are being use to criminalise freedom of speech. The latest is Ireland, a country that has being literally raped by religion yet has passed a law protecting it from criticism. Talk about Stockholm Syndrome!

Free speech, they tell us, carries certain responsibilities; well too true, it does, the most primary one being that what you say should be the truth. And the truth should never be embarrassing and it should never be illegal, and any government that’s so embarrassed by the truth that it makes it illegal is governing under false pretences. The Dutch Government for example which is in the process of embarrassing itself by prosecuting the leader of one of the country’s largest political parties for the ‘crime’ of telling the truth. You see, these days in Europe we have become so used to weasel words and double standards that the truth has become distinctly unfashionable. Speaking your mind is now seen as virtually anti social because some opportunistic cry-baby is sure to take offense and throw a tantrum, and that might threaten community cohesion.

Now what has all this got to do with America? Well, President Obama is very keen on showing respect to the Muslim world and nobody can fault him on his record so far, bowing as he did to the King of Saudi Arabia like some kind of vassal, and then making a rather flattering and, some might even say, dishonest speech in Cairo, although to be fair to him he did stop short of prostrating himself towards Mecca… at least for the time being! But because he wants to play ball with Islam, especially now that they have given him a peace prize through their shills in the Norwegian establishment, that he’s going to have to justify for the next three years. The Iranians must be rubbing their hands with glee at that one.

The American Government has now done something that if they did it in their own country it would violate the Constitution. They have co-sponsored a UN resolution that puts a limit on freedom of speech because the Islamic countries don’t like free speech, they don’t like free anything, except free foreign aid – obviously they can’t get enough of that!

Even the Saudis want aid now, have you heard their latest? I could hardly believe it! The Saudis have said that when the world starts using less oil they expect to be compensated for loss of income! You really couldn’t make it up could you?

Now the problem with the new touchy-feely American administration is not that they want to be friendly and respectful towards everyone; that’s very laudable. It’s just that when you have a moral agenda like that it can be tempting to cut corners, especially when it comes to inconvenient things like… Constitutional amendments. And if they are doing this now outside the United States, where they can get away with it, it’s only a matter of time before this is allowed to become international law, and then you know they’re going to start trying to do it inside the United States as well; in the name of ‘community cohesion’- get used to that phrase America, it’s coming you way! And this matters, it matters a lot, not only to Americans but to all of us who see the American Constitution as the anchor for Western Civilisation, which is what it is! We know that no matter how spineless our politicians are here in Europe and elsewhere , and here in Europe they’ve barley got a vertebrae between them. As long as America’s First Amendment remains inviolate there will always be an oasis of freedom on this planet that Islam cannot touch. But as soon as anyone is allowed to interfere with it, to water it down, to reinterpret, to chip and chisel away at the First Amendment for reasons of religious or cultural sensitivity then we wave our civilisation goodbye.

Americans voted for change at the last election, they didn’t vote for surrender. Watch what’s happening in Europe America, cherish that Constitution and don’t let Islam anywhere near it for all our sakes. Remember the words of Mr Omar Ahmad, co-founder of the Council on American Islamic Relations, who said that Islam is not in America to be equal to other faiths but to become dominant and that the Koran should be the highest authority in America. That would be higher than the Constitution then by my reckoning.

You know, if President Obama is serious about showing respect to the Muslim world, then he should pay them the compliment of telling them the truth – that their religion is entitled to as much respect as it gives – zero! And that with their record no Islamic country has any business even holding an opinion on human rights, let alone serving on a legislative body. Then asking the people of the free world to compromise their fundamental values is far, far more insulting than any set of cartoons or any book could ever be. And that if the Islamic countries had an ounce of genuine honour between them, they would issue a full and unconditional apology. That’s what he should say, because that’s the truth. Everyone in the free world knows it’s the truth. So let’s hope the truth becomes fashionable again… before too long.

Peace – oh yes.

Gash: “Demonstrate wherever you can!”

http://www.pi-news.org/2009/09/gash-demonstrate-wherever-you-can/

Stephen Gash, spokesman of SIOE, was talking with PI about the incidents at the anti-Islam rally in Harrow in September 2009 and about the Islamisation of the UK. Violent Muslims managed to prevent an officially allowed demonstration on September 11th – another milestone on the road to Eurabia.

PI: Mister Gash, many thanks for giving us an interview concerning the incident in Harrow on 11 September 2009. The demonstration in Harrow was called off by the police. However, one hour before the demonstration was supposed to begin, it was fairly obvious that many of the Muslim counter-demonstrators were ready to use violence. Consequently, there would have been enough time to call for back up. But one hour later, there were not enough policemen to enable the implementation of your demonstration, which was approved by the authorities. Do you think that the authorities were really willing to let this demonstration happen?

Gash: No. I think it was intended from very early on to not allow the demonstration. The impression I had was that the police anticipated a counter-demonstration from Muslims and the so-called anti-fascists, so they put 550 police officers around the mosque. However, when the numbers of counter-demonstrators grew to over 1,000 the police decided not to allow the demonstration to go ahead. I heard afterwards that people were being turned back from the area, at the tube stations and roads leading to the mosque, just as in Brussels in 2007. I don’t think the number of our supporters would have been big, perhaps 60 – 100, but we are pretty sure about 60 were prevented from getting to the demo by the police.

It would have been difficult for police to mobilize enough officers within an hour and I doubt they could have come from other parts of London because that would have left certain parts of London with too few officers on a Friday night. Bringing in police from outside London would have taken longer than an hour.

Many counter-demonstrators (Muslims and Non-Muslims alike) were carrying signs with slogans such as “Stop the fascist BNP” and “Racists out”. However, the SIOE clearly dissociates itself from racism on its website: “Racism is the lowest form of human stupidity, (…)”. How does the SIOE deal with racists who are willing to attend demonstrations who are organised by the SIOE?

We ban all political parties, so any party with a racist background would not be allowed to attend our demonstrations also. Political parties just want to advertise themselves, which distracts from the message of the demonstrations.

Counter-demonstrators use placards with “stop the fascist BNP” to make onlookers believe that the BNP is involved with the demonstration. This gives the UAF a kind of legitimacy it does not merit. However, until Harrow, SIOE never had any opposition in England at it demonstrations because SIOE is accepted in England as a non-racist and anti-totalitarian organisation.

This is why we have significant support from Copts and Hindus for example.

In fact, SIOE is the ONLY organisation in England that demonstrates against the persecution of Copts in Egypt. We always mention the Copts in our speeches in England.

We say, “An accusation of racism is the death rattle of a lost argument.” This is especially the case with Islam. Muslims are from many races and they willingly kill non-Muslims of all races.

The number of Non-Muslim counter-demonstrators was relatively small at the demonstration in Harrow (around 10 %). If the same demonstration took place in Germany, there would probably be significantly more Non-Muslim counter-demonstrators. Do you think that the British society is becoming more and more aware of the Islamic threat – after “7/7” and documentaries such as “Muslim first, British second” and “Undercover Mosque”?

We know that the vast majority of people want to stop Islamisation in England and other parts of the UK. Like other parts of Europe, England now has mini-Meccas where non-Muslims are not permitted. Our dhimmi government is seemingly willing to see more such mini-Meccas. Consequently, ordinary non-Muslims are unwilling to oppose SIOE and join self-styled anti-fascist groups.

The 7/7 bombings, the failed 21/7 bombings and other Islamic-terrorist incidents have worked in keeping people from joining the “anti-Fascists”. People know that Islamic hatred and Jihad are preached from the mosques, due to the documentaries and newspaper articles that have exposed, what the media call “radical mosques”.

Those of us, who have been trying to stop Islamisation, know that these mosques are just the same as those in Muslim countries like Pakistan, Iran, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia etc. They are not preaching radicalism, only Islam. Ordinary people just know that until the hate preaching is stopped, no more mosques should be built.

Can you please describe the current Muslim influence on British politics?

It is huge. We now have Muslim Ministers of State and like many EU countries the British Government is dhimmified due to oil. Britain has huge armaments sales to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states. Through the Commonwealth, a legacy of the British Empire, Pakistan and other Islamic countries such as Malaysia, are able to exert considerable pressure on the British Government.

This causes conflict with other Commonwealth countries like India. Home Secretary, David Miliband, annoyed the Indian Government by suggesting the Mumbai bombings were due to India’s policy on Kashmir.

Britain always sides with Muslims in any conflicts. A notable example is Nigeria where Britain backed the Muslims in the north against the Biafrans in the south. Likewise, our Government never mentions the Copts in Egypt. Egypt was a former colony of the British Empire and that is where the Suez Canal lies.

The Iranian Government singled out Britain for special condemnation during their rigged elections. They accused Britain of interfering like “old colonialists”.

The legacy of empire is that Britain’s government treads carefully around former colonised countries, especially Muslim ones. This favouritism of Muslim countries is mirrored in Britain where Muslims are favoured over everybody else, by our government

How did the British society react to the entry ban of Geert Wilders in 2009?

I think that episode will mean the Labour Party losing power at the next election. It was profoundly embarrassing to the British people. On top of all the scandals and the wrecking of the economy, the British Government caving in to Muslims was humiliating, especially as London had been on the receiving end of Islamist bombings and more recently Glasgow airport had been the scene of a terrorist attack.

We have troops fighting Islamists in Afghanistan, but the British Government submits to Muslim threats in Britain.

The British Government are cowards, but the British people aren’t. I truly think that Geert Wilders being banned was the final straw that broke the camel’s back.

What kind of advice do you have for the Germans to restrict the spread of Islamic ideology in their society?

Demonstrate where you can, get an army of activists on the streets and also an army of armchair activists to write letters to politicians and the media saying how disgusted they are at how Germany is being Islamised.

Name and shame those councillors and politicians who permit favouritism to Muslims. Publish their contact details and get irate Germans to bombard them with emails and letters.

Organise boycotts of construction companies building mosques. Boycott food companies selling halal food. Demonstrate outside dhimmi supermarkets that cater for Muslims.

When Germans are told not to do something because it offends Muslims, do it. When Germans are banned from swimming pools during “Muslim times” turn up in hundreds and go for a swim.

Get a SIOE group of ordinary people to demonstrate against Islamisation and to expose how the German media do not report on Muslims atrocities around the world. Get a football supporter German Defence League, like the one in England, of young men who are not scared of Muslims. Get gays and lesbians to demonstrate outside mosques against the lack of human rights in Iran and Saudi Arabia.

The action has to be constant and from all kinds of people, sometimes with different groups together and sometimes only in their own groups.

The Germans are renowned around the world for their ability to organise. However, it will take an international effort to save all our countries.

Mr. Gash, we’ll be happy to give your good advice to our readers. Many thanks for the interesting interview.

The counter-demonstration in Harrow was for Muslims only:

“There are no laws to stop us. We are our own law.”

by Baron Bodissey

The following German news report explores in appalling detail the lawlessness of violent immigrant gangs in Germany, whose members operate with impunity and hold the police in contempt. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes and ESW for this English-language version.

WARNING: This video contains unedited offensive language.

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/08/there-are-no-laws-to-stop-us-we-are-our.html#readfurther

see also: http://tundratabloid.blogspot.com/2009/08/german-immigrant-street-gangs-calling.html

Pat Condell

Geert Wilders: Fitna (Deutsch)