Mission Europa Netzwerk Karl Martell

Archive for October, 2009

No More Concessions Without Concessions in Return

Posted by paulipoldie on October 31, 2009


by Baron Bodissey

In the following guest-essay, a reader named Robert Stansfield offers a suggested strategy for dealing with the ever-growing demands for accommodation by Muslims in the West.

Hijab is a human right
No More Concessions Without Concessions in Return
by Robert Stansfield

Muslims in the West are constantly making demands for freedom: freedom to build mosques, freedom to wear the burka and hijab, freedom to practice Sharia law. They generally present these demands as basic rights owed to them by the countries in which they live. And Western liberals — even those opposed to the Islamic agenda — are hard-pressed to rebuff them.

This is due to a faulty conceptualization of the issue. A new approach must be adopted. Let’s call it “Linkage”. The idea is simple: Muslims have no rights in Western lands as long as non-Muslims are being persecuted in Muslim lands.

Some simple examples:

1. No more mosques in the West, until there is a church in Mecca.
2. No freedom to wear Muslim clothing in the West, until all women have the freedom to wear whatever they want in Mecca.
3. No more funding of Islamic education and proselytizing in the West, until all faiths are free to establish schools, libraries and missions in Mecca.
4. No foot baths for Muslims, until there are holy water dispensers for Christians in Mecca.


We all know what’s going on in Mecca. Christians, Jews and other faiths are barred entry in a form of Islamic apartheid.

In Mecca, churches are illegal. The Bible and the cross are illegal. Priests are illegal. Preaching Christianity and other faiths is punishable by imprisonment, torture and death. Converting to Christianity or another faith is punishable by imprisonment, torture and death. In short, the heartland of Islam is one of the most appalling hellholes of religious intolerance in the world today.

Yet Muslims have the gall to demand footbaths and other frivolous perks in our lands. The hypocrisy reeks like a sewer. It’s obscene, and even the most unconcerned layman can immediately perceive the unfairness. Muslims are only concerned for freedom when they are on the receiving end.

This is my proposal: We in the anti-Jihad movement should adopt the principle of “Linkage” as a war cry. We should repeat it like a broken record. Advocate it relentlessly on blogs and in street demonstrations. Distribute flyers. Pressure politicians. Run television ads. Make it into T-shirts and hats and coffee mugs. Glue posters to walls with really stubborn glue. DEMAND fairness!

The principle of linkage is already making inroads. Last year, the Russians demanded a quid pro quo from the Saudis:
– – – – – – – –

A Saudi Mosque in Moscow in Exchange for a Russian Church in Mecca?

The king of Saudi Arabia has announced that he is ready to support the construction of a mosque and Islamic cultural center in Moscow, a city with only four mosques for its more than two million Muslims. In response and probably to block this, Orthodox Christians in Russia have called for opening a church in Saudi Arabia.


After the Saudi offer was reported, three Russian Orthodox groups — the Moscow section of the Union of Orthodox Citizens, the Radonezh Society, and the Byzantine Club — released an open letter to Saudi King Abdullah suggesting that there should be another mosque in Moscow only after a Russian Orthodox church was opened in Mecca.

Jean-Louis Cardinal Toran, the head of the Papal Council on Inter-religious Dialogue, agrees:

If Muslims consider it correct to have a large and beautiful mosque in Rome, then it is equally correct for Christians to have a church in Riyadh.

Alison Ruoff, a prominent evangelical member of the Church of England’s General Synod, has applied linkage:

Mrs Ruoff, a former magistrate, said in an interview with London’s Premier Christian Radio that no more mosques should be built in Britain until all persecution of Christians in Muslim nations had ceased.

The British writer Adrian Morgan raises the same point:

Yet when one sees the number of mosques being erected in Britain, often with money from Saudi Arabia, I wonder why no Far Left individual raises the question of hypocrisy. Saudi Arabia funds the export of Islam around the world (even to Nepal), yet prevents any Bibles from being brought into their kingdom. No churches are allowed to be built in Saudi Arabia, and migrant workers who hold unofficial Christian services have been jailed.

Similarly in Pakistan, Christians are a minority group, yet they are persecuted mercilessly. In Malaysia, no one is allowed to leave Islam and Buddhists, Hindus and Christians are legally defined as second-class citizens, and yet Malaysia regards itself as upholding a “civilizational” form of Islam.

The principle of linkage is gaining momentum. With the help of everyone in the Counterjihad community, we can broaden it into an avalanche.


Posted in Islam - What can we do? Was können wir tun? | Leave a Comment »

Islam und die westliche Welt – Video

Posted by paulipoldie on October 30, 2009

Posted in Mission Europa | 1 Comment »

Portrait of the Good Muslim, Part 2

Posted by paulipoldie on October 25, 2009


There are many good people amongst Muslims. It has been emphasized in Part 1 of this series that these personally honorable Muslims are ironically the worst of Muslims; for, they give a bad religion a good name and aid its continuation. Those Muslims—who act as Imams and Islamic “academics”, thus, working to further the goals of this fundamentally unjust, inherently violent, and highly intolerant religion—do a greater harm to humanity.

If these above-mentioned groups of otherwise good persons continue in their ways and succeed in keeping Islam alive and flourishing, the world, in due course, will turn a dark place, where no sane people would want their children to live in. The time has come for all Muslims—both laymen and learned, moderate and fundamentalist—to objectively examine the religion they currently believe to be infallible and beyond the need for critical examination. The horrible truth about the Islamic religion must become known if humanity is to survive.

It has become obvious to many Muslims that there is something seriously wrong with Islam. But what is that? What is wrong with Islam? Was Muhammad merely a sick human being and a liar? Is Islam the corrupted product of many different hands?

These questions are well worth asking as there is so much at stake. Those good honorable people, who adhere to Islam, must ask themselves whether Islam is in fact a religion come from God as Muhammad proclaimed. Many Muslims—now aware of Muhammad’s questionable behavior and actions (murder, assassination, thievery, pedophilia etc.)—should be wondering whether they should continue blindly following this sick man, and his hateful and violent religion.

Unfortunately, the fear that Muhammad’s Islam implants in the mind of Muslims has rendered them incapable of thinking rationally about the religion. This is changing though, as more and more Muslims become exposed to the grotesque truth about Muhammad and Islam. Upon learning the truth about Islam, honest people of integrity begin the profoundly liberating process of apostasizing from Islam. It can definitively be stated that no decent person of sane mind, knowing the real facts about Islam, could remain in the religion with a clear conscience. We, the informed apostates of Islam, know for certain that Muhammad’s Islam is, in reality, the exact opposite of what it claims to be.

Most Muslims genuinely do not know how evil the Islamic ideology really is. It is an indisputable fact that Islam institutionalizes discrimination against women and non-Muslims, effectively puts an end to freedom of speech and conscience, and ensures perpetual warfare amongst mankind. Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is not a flawless faith received from a god. Muhammad was not the perfect man. This “religion” is so perverse in fact that it demands that those, who leave it, be killed:

Bukhari, Vol. 9, Book 84, No. 57:

Narrated Ikrima
Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn Abbas who said, “If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s Apostle forbade it, saying, ‘Do not punish anybody with Allah’s punishment (fire)’. I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostle, ‘Whoever changes his Islamic religion, then kill him.’”

Quranic verses (referring to the prescribed treatment for apostates):

YUSUFALI: Why should ye be divided into two parties about the Hypocrites? Allah hath upset them for their (evil) deeds. Would ye guide those whom Allah hath thrown out of the Way? For those whom Allah hath thrown out of the Way, never shalt thou find the Way.
PICKTHAL: What aileth you that ye are become two parties regarding the hypocrites, when Allah cast them back (to disbelief) because of what they earned? Seek ye to guide him whom Allah hath sent astray? He whom Allah sendeth astray, for him thou (O MUhammad) canst not find a road.
SHAKIR: What is the matter with you, then, that you have become two parties about the hypocrites, while Allah has made them return (to unbelief) for what they have earned? Do you wish to guide him whom Allah has caused to err? And whomsoever Allah causes to err, you shall by no means find a way for him.

YUSUFALI: They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks;-
PICKTHAL: They long that ye should disbelieve even as they disbelieve, that ye may be upon a level (with them). So choose not friends from them till they forsake their homes in the way of Allah; if they turn back (to enmity) then take them and kill them wherever ye find them, and choose no friend nor helper from among them,
SHAKIR: They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so that you might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah’s way; but if they turn back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a friend or a helper.

YUSUFALI: Except those who join a group between whom and you there is a treaty (of peace), or those who approach you with hearts restraining them from fighting you as well as fighting their own people. If Allah had pleased, He could have given them power over you, and they would have fought you: Therefore if they withdraw from you but fight you not, and (instead) send you (Guarantees of) peace, then Allah Hath opened no way for you (to war against them).
PICKTHAL: Except those who seek refuge with a people between whom and you there is a covenant, or (those who) come unto you because their hearts forbid them to make war on you or make war on their own folk. Had Allah willed He could have given them power over you so that assuredly they would have fought you. So, if they hold aloof from you and wage not war against you and offer you peace, Allah alloweth you no way against them.
SHAKIR: Except those who reach a people between whom and you there is an alliance, or who come to you, their hearts shrinking from fighting you or fighting their own people; and if Allah had pleased, He would have given them power over you, so that they should have certainly fought you; therefore if they withdraw from you and do not fight you and offer you peace, then Allah has not given you a way against them.

YUSUFALI: Others you will find that wish to gain your confidence as well as that of their people: Every time they are sent back to temptation, they succumb thereto: if they withdraw not from you nor give you (guarantees) of peace besides restraining their hands, seize them and slay them wherever ye get them: In their case We have provided you with a clear argument against them.
PICKTHAL: Ye will find others who desire that they should have security from you, and security from their own folk. So often as they are returned to hostility they are plunged therein. If they keep not aloof from you nor offer you peace nor hold their hands, then take them and kill them wherever ye find them. Against such We have given you clear warrant.
SHAKIR: You will find others who desire that they should be safe from you and secure from their own people; as often as they are sent back to the mischief they get thrown into it headlong; therefore if they do not withdraw from you, and (do not) offer you peace and restrain their hands, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them; and against these We have given you a clear authority.

Muslims ought to think deeply about the implications of the quranic verses. See my recent article, The Reality of Friendship in Islam, for another perspective on this matter.

Muhammad was a deranged man. He was so deranged that he himself believed his own lies. He made his living and satisfied his “needs” by creating enemies, then raiding and looting their property. Muhammad and his gang of criminals butchered thousands of people during their raids. Often the women and children were spared death only to be enslaved and sold for profit or used as concubines and free labor. Many of the modern-day followers of Muhammad’s cult of Islam want to re-live that savage age. They want to slaughter ‘infidels’ and take their wives. They want to see stoning, amputation, and imprison women inside full-length black garb on every street. The early Muslims became Muslims by being duped or threatened by that mad man. Modern Muslims, even the most educated, are Muslims due to either fear or ignorance, period.

The good Muslims must be terribly disturbed when witnessing the constant horrors being created around the world by their co-religionists, who rightly justify their evil deeds in the name of Islam. Tragically, according to Islam, Muslims need only treat Muslims justly; to hell with the rights of infidels. The misery and loss of life caused by Muslims, acting upon the dictates of Islam, are staggering. The harm that Islam has wrought upon humanity is without parallel among the world’s religions. It has now become crystal-clear to sensible people that Muhammad’s legacy is the most shameful and harmful legacy of all of the leaders the world has come to know by name. The name Muhammad now denotes disgust, distrust and dishonesty. Though for Muslims, as any ‘true believer’ will tell you, Muhammad is still the perfect man, whose every word and example is to be obeyed without question…???

It is quite reasonable that many Muslims are considering walking away from this sick man’s cult/belief system as millions of good people have done before them. Only an imbecile would continue to believe that Muhammad was the messenger of god.

Truth be told, many Muslims stay in Islam simply out of fear for their lives. Though the following statement is harsh to be sure, it is nonetheless true: Educated Muslims, especially those living in non-Muslim-majority countries, should be ashamed of themselves for not taking the time to learn and consider the objective truth about Islam from easily available sources and then wholly abandoning Islam, help expose this horrible fraud.

Those Muslims, who choose to cling to Islam stubbornly knowing what they now surely know about it, are stabbing themselves and humanity in the back. Fifty years from now, Islam will be seen as a belief system far worse than even Hitler’s Nazism, and those human beings who remain “Muslim” will be looked upon as mentally ill freaks that no reasonable person would trust or respect. Adherence to Islam in the 21st century is fast becoming known as the ultimate self-betrayal. Now that the truth about Islam has become known, there is no excuse for a free man or women to remain Muslim.

Islam should rightly be abhorred by all persons of conscience. Muhammad’s Islam is a fundamentally unjust ideology, with hatred and violence flowing through its veins. ‘The good Muslims’ must decide whether they want to live a lie and go down the dark path of Islam, or make the courageous decision to abandon this religion entirely and help in the effort to expose it for what it is. It is time for the good Muslims to come to the realization that Muhammad’s Islam, taken in totality, amounts to a colossal fraud and a terribly harmful ideology.

Saleem Smith is a Canadian Ex-Muslim. He has his own blog in which he expresses his views on Islam and other issues.

Posted in Islam | Leave a Comment »

Portrait of the Good Muslim, Part 1

Posted by paulipoldie on October 25, 2009


Ironically, honorable Muslims are the worst Muslims; for, they give a bad religion a good name and aid in its continuation. The survival of Islam would be a terrible calamity to befall humanity. These harsh statements are hard facts that the ‘good Muslim’ ought to consider deeply. This series of articles will attempt to shed light on this reality. [read in Bangla] Those folks, who consider themselves to be good Muslims, must be troubled witnessing the constant horrors being created by their co-religionists. Muslims are now commonly viewed by non-Muslims as a dangerous segment of the population, who hold very strange views of the world and their fellow humans. Those non-Muslims, who are well-versed in Islamic theology and the ambitions of the Islamists to institute Sharia law, are right in being mistrustful of the Muslim population. The horrific state of the Islamic world and the dysfunctional behavior of their co-religionists should awaken the ‘good Muslim’ consider whether there is something intrinsically wrong with Islam. The ‘good Muslim’ must ask themselves why their brethren behave so violently toward each other and toward non-Muslims. It should make an honest person wonder whether Islam is truly what it claims to be. It is worth considering this question rigorously, since so many lives are at stake. We know from Islamic history, and by looking around the world today, that Islam is evidently not a religion of peace. The talk of Islam being the religion of peace is just talk. Islam has long proven itself to be a religion of violence and hatred that commonly inspires its adherents to commit acts of obscene bloodshed and intolerance. In light of all this, it seems that those, who proclaim themselves to be Muslims, would be wise to reexamine the claims of their religion. Islam has historically created undemocratic societal structures, which are steeped in nepotism and tyranny. Where Islam is the law of the land—that is, lands ruled by Sharia law—it has been devastating to the well-being and civility of its citizenry. Without doubt, Muhammad has betrayed his followers leaving behind an unjust religion (an obvious example being inferior status and rights of women to those of men) producing an untenable mess. It is futile for Islamic apologists to attempt to deny these statements, as the facts speak for themselves. We know that Islamic terrorism is the result of Muslims acting upon Islamic doctrine. The adherents of no other major religion attempt to settle their real or imagined grievances with such consistent acts of savage violence as do Muslims. Both the Quran and the Sunnah obviate the fact that Muhammad himself was a terrorist, a mass murderer and a robber, who urged his followers to conquer the world by any means necessary. He claimed that this is what his God, i.e. Allah, demands to be done. This Islamic supremacism is sheer barbarism and insanity. Truth be told that radical Muslims are only following in Muhammad’s footsteps and acting upon his commandments. Though the ‘good Muslim’ prefer to acknowledge only the peaceful and sane Islamic traditions, the time has come for them to abandon this infantile approach and to stop overlooking the truly dark contents of their religion, and what it demands of them and its negative impact upon humanity. The time has come for Muslims to take off their blinders and to embark upon an objective and critical examination of Islam. The evidence will unmistakably lead them to conclude that Muhammad was a full-blown madman, who deserved to be recorded by history as nothing less than the most notorious criminal and deceitful human being to have ever lived. The question at hand is whether decent folks, who currently call themselves Muslims, are willing to continue compromise their integrity by practising and promoting Islam, despite knowing many of its horrors. Many educated Muslims are now beginning to realize that adherence to Islam cannot be justified and are discretely walking away from it. It has become clear to them that the founder of Islam, Muhammad ibn Abdullah, was just one more charlatan, who fabricated a religion—a religion, based primarily on fear, hatred and violence, and a most violent one at that. Islam should rightly be abhorred by all persons of conscience. The ‘good Muslim’ must decide whether they want to live a lie and go down the dark path of Islam, or make the courageous decision to abandon it entirely and help expose it for what it truly is. It is time for the good Muslims to come to the realization that Muhammad’s Islam, taken in totality, amounts to a colossal fraud and a terribly harmful ideology.

Posted in Islam | Leave a Comment »

Wake Up, America!

Posted by paulipoldie on October 22, 2009

Pat Condell at his best! A must-see.

transcription: ICLA

Transcript of Pat Condell’s Video: Wake up, America

You remember the cartel of Islamic dictatorships that hijacked the United Nations Human Rights Council don’t you? And then promptly passed a resolution banning the criticism of religion? Yes of course you do!

Well, apparently they’ve decided now that the Universal Declaration of Human rights gives people just a bit too much freedom and dignity for their liking. And so they’ve devised their own Islamic human rights charter which is a bit like Satan getting his own set of pearly gates and about as convincing. Unfortunately the Islamic charter is based on Sharia which is, of course, invalid because it’s God’s law and God doesn’t exist; to claim that he does is extremely offensive to those of us who passionately believe otherwise. It’s a grave insult to our most deeply cherished beliefs , an assault on the very core of our being, no less, and a violation, therefore, of our human rights – isn’t it?. Well, isn’t it?

Now all this would be something of a tiresome joke if not for the fact that this nonsense is beginning to have a real effect on our basic freedoms, certainly here in Europe, and Americans would do well to wake up and pay attention to what’s going on. Ever since the Islamic countries demanded that Western governments make it a crime to criticise Islam, all over Europe blasphemy laws and religious insult laws are being use to criminalise freedom of speech. The latest is Ireland, a country that has being literally raped by religion yet has passed a law protecting it from criticism. Talk about Stockholm Syndrome!

Free speech, they tell us, carries certain responsibilities; well too true, it does, the most primary one being that what you say should be the truth. And the truth should never be embarrassing and it should never be illegal, and any government that’s so embarrassed by the truth that it makes it illegal is governing under false pretences. The Dutch Government for example which is in the process of embarrassing itself by prosecuting the leader of one of the country’s largest political parties for the ‘crime’ of telling the truth. You see, these days in Europe we have become so used to weasel words and double standards that the truth has become distinctly unfashionable. Speaking your mind is now seen as virtually anti social because some opportunistic cry-baby is sure to take offense and throw a tantrum, and that might threaten community cohesion.

Now what has all this got to do with America? Well, President Obama is very keen on showing respect to the Muslim world and nobody can fault him on his record so far, bowing as he did to the King of Saudi Arabia like some kind of vassal, and then making a rather flattering and, some might even say, dishonest speech in Cairo, although to be fair to him he did stop short of prostrating himself towards Mecca… at least for the time being! But because he wants to play ball with Islam, especially now that they have given him a peace prize through their shills in the Norwegian establishment, that he’s going to have to justify for the next three years. The Iranians must be rubbing their hands with glee at that one.

The American Government has now done something that if they did it in their own country it would violate the Constitution. They have co-sponsored a UN resolution that puts a limit on freedom of speech because the Islamic countries don’t like free speech, they don’t like free anything, except free foreign aid – obviously they can’t get enough of that!

Even the Saudis want aid now, have you heard their latest? I could hardly believe it! The Saudis have said that when the world starts using less oil they expect to be compensated for loss of income! You really couldn’t make it up could you?

Now the problem with the new touchy-feely American administration is not that they want to be friendly and respectful towards everyone; that’s very laudable. It’s just that when you have a moral agenda like that it can be tempting to cut corners, especially when it comes to inconvenient things like… Constitutional amendments. And if they are doing this now outside the United States, where they can get away with it, it’s only a matter of time before this is allowed to become international law, and then you know they’re going to start trying to do it inside the United States as well; in the name of ‘community cohesion’- get used to that phrase America, it’s coming you way! And this matters, it matters a lot, not only to Americans but to all of us who see the American Constitution as the anchor for Western Civilisation, which is what it is! We know that no matter how spineless our politicians are here in Europe and elsewhere , and here in Europe they’ve barley got a vertebrae between them. As long as America’s First Amendment remains inviolate there will always be an oasis of freedom on this planet that Islam cannot touch. But as soon as anyone is allowed to interfere with it, to water it down, to reinterpret, to chip and chisel away at the First Amendment for reasons of religious or cultural sensitivity then we wave our civilisation goodbye.

Americans voted for change at the last election, they didn’t vote for surrender. Watch what’s happening in Europe America, cherish that Constitution and don’t let Islam anywhere near it for all our sakes. Remember the words of Mr Omar Ahmad, co-founder of the Council on American Islamic Relations, who said that Islam is not in America to be equal to other faiths but to become dominant and that the Koran should be the highest authority in America. That would be higher than the Constitution then by my reckoning.

You know, if President Obama is serious about showing respect to the Muslim world, then he should pay them the compliment of telling them the truth – that their religion is entitled to as much respect as it gives – zero! And that with their record no Islamic country has any business even holding an opinion on human rights, let alone serving on a legislative body. Then asking the people of the free world to compromise their fundamental values is far, far more insulting than any set of cartoons or any book could ever be. And that if the Islamic countries had an ounce of genuine honour between them, they would issue a full and unconditional apology. That’s what he should say, because that’s the truth. Everyone in the free world knows it’s the truth. So let’s hope the truth becomes fashionable again… before too long.

Peace – oh yes.

Posted in Freedom of Speech/Redefreiheit, Human Rights - menschenrechte, Islam, Islamisierung, Videos | 5 Comments »

It’s the Austrians’ Fault!

Posted by paulipoldie on October 22, 2009


by Baron Bodissey

Our Austrian correspondent ESW has translated a pair of articles about the “parallel society” of Turks in Austria, and the debate that has arisen after the politically incorrect words of Thilo Sarrazin were publicized.

The translator includes this note:

This past weekend the Austrian newspaper Die Presse once again focused on Turkish migrants. It seems that the Turks must be the only migrant group in Austria. Certainly the Polish or the Germans — who according to a socialist member of government constitute the largest migrant groups in Austria — do not get the same sort of coverage. Now what might be the reason for that?

What is interesting about the articles below is their openness in addressing the problems. However, one comment from the online articles summed it up well:

“My God, dear Presse: Why bother writing the articles? Why not just write the following: It’s the Austrians’ fault. Always and forever.”

We will not capitulate!

Immigration and the welfare state show us that the politically correct are crazy. People like Thilo Sarrazin are helping them to adjust their view of reality.

Thilo Sarrazin, a member of the board of Deutsche Bundesbank, has now lost responsibility for the bank’s cash flow, while still in charge of risk controlling. This was a pretty Austrian “punishment” for saying “evil things” in an interview with the magazine “Lettre International” about Berlin and its immigrants, especially about Turks and Arabs.

His malicious comments about the production of headscarved girls and vegetables have become popular. A short summary of the debate surrounding Sarrazin would look something like this: He is right about nearly everything, but you can’t say it like he did. Naturally, all those who are sick of political correctness are furious because it associates everything sounding remotely like plain speaking with racism. At the same time, political correctness goes too far for those who really want to be politically correct: They believe that all people, especially those with an immigrant background, are inherently good. These immigrants, living in — say — Berlin, Vienna, and London are suffering simply because they are not seen as the enrichment they think they are. They are saying: Sarrazin is wrong, and this is obvious from the way he chose to say it.

Well, they are wrong. Sarrazin is right not only with regards to content. He also said the way it needs to be said. Not only in terms of the immigration question, but also in the welfare state debate — which are in tandem with immigration within the welfare system — have the German-Austrian engineers of social welfare failed. The language vehicles belonging to the mechanics of welfare have crashed: these chauffeurs of political correctness — with their political swerving — have driven the pushcart of discussion against the wall. There is no longer anyone who believes them. This because there is hardly anyone left whose personal experiences in welfare matters correspond with politically correct doctrine. Which, in turn, can only mean the following: for someone who doesn’t consider himself crazy, it is the politically correct who are out of their minds.

Well, they are crazy: their struggle in favor of a concern that must not be denounced has moved their perception of reality. It is up to people without a political agenda, like Thilo Sarrazin, to move it back: Turkish students — if they had a halfway decent upbringing — use a similar language to that of Sarrazin when speaking about their Austrian (female) teachers. These Turkish students understand what Thilo Sarrazin is saying. If we stopped using clear language simply out of fear of antagonizing the addressees even more, Henryk Broder’s prophecy would come true:

“Hurray, we’re capitulating.”

And we should not do that. Not to those immigrants unwilling to integrate, not to the killer arguments of the politically correct and not to the former neo-Nazis.

The Turks’ own world
– – – – – – – –

“Unwilling to integrate” — this is the accusation more and often confronting the Turkish community. Many consider this an exaggeration. But some Turks themselves criticize the tendency towards parallel societies.

The buzzwords characterizing the latest integration debate have flown by Mehmet Yurtseven and Yusuf Can. Thilo Sarrazin? Parallel societies? Turks unwilling to integrate? They both have different worries.

The teenagers are standing in front of the bleak entrance area of the Public Employment Service Austria (AMS) for young adults. There is the Maturaschule Dr. Roland [a private school offering courses to make up high school certificates] on the left; on the right there is the door to AMS Young Adults. Mehmet and Yusuf choose the door on the right. They are seeking work. It is a few minutes before ten a.m., and in a few minutes they will meet their adviser. Mehmet, whose hair is hidden by a black woolen cap, dropped out of high school (specializing in technical professions) and wants to start an apprenticeship in December. Yusuf, taller than Mehmet and clad in a leather jacket, found studying at the polytechnic school “a bit hard”. “I had one of the strictest teachers of the entire school,” he defends himself. Soon he will attend a special course to help him choose the right career in order to start an apprenticeship. Perhaps.

Mehmet and Yusuf are typing on their cell phones; they are wearing jeans and hooded sweaters; and they live in the 10th district [a district in Vienna with a high rate of immigrants]. They missed out on their education, and they are only sixteen years old. Their vita so far is unspectacular, and so is their place is the negative tables of statistics: 12,000 young adults between the age of 15 and 20 are currently “seeking work”, more than 65% of which have a migration background; the rate of unemployment among young adults with Turkish background was 18.4% in 2007, among Austrian young adults, 7.4%. The latest OECD study reveals that of the 20- to 29-year-olds with a migration background, the proportion of those without a high school certificate or a completed professional education is three times as high as that of young adults without a migration background.

Is the case of the two guys, who are on course to a very precarious future, a failure of integration politics? Is it a lack of interest? Has integration failed? Mehmet Yurtseven sees this differently: “Is doesn’t matter is you’re Austrian or Turkish.” He doesn’t understand the problem. “I have no problem with them.” He is talking about the Austrians. Mehmet is an Austrian citizen.

Who is Thilo Sarrazin? Mehmet and Yusuf do not know Thilo Sarrazin, the former Bundesbank manager and former SPD senator from Berlin, who said in an interview that the majority of German Turks are “neither willing nor able to integrate.” It was Sarrazin who spoke of Turks taking over Germany and “producing more and more little hijab girls.”

It was Sarrazin who started the debate, which will not die down soon, even though Sarrazin apologized and said that not every word was “wisely chosen”. For some he — relatively unsuspicious as a member of SPD (unlike FPÖ-leader Heinz-Christian Strache) — finally articulated something that had long been simmering below the surface of peacefully living next to each other; for others his words were outright racism. For instance, for Maria Anna Six-Hohenbalken of the Akademie der Wissenschaften (Academy of Sciences): it is a historical phenomenon to consider Turkish immigrants “problematic”, according to the cultural anthropologist. “Since the 16th century, there has been an tendency to classify the Orientals in ‘good’ and ‘bad’.”

Unskilled laborers without any chances.

Six stories above the heads of Mehmet and Yusuf, in the AMS office, there are question marks on the faces of the AMS director, Gerda Challuper, and the diversity manager, Ali Ordubadi, regarding the tilt in numbers, and why it is the Turkish children and young adults at the end of the statistics. Their parents often lack education, are less qualified compared to other migrant groups, and these families are often uniformed about the school system and the labor market. “In the past, the parents always found work as unskilled laborers,” says Ali Ordubadi. “They are passing on these experiences. But the job market has changed. You can’t find a job as an unskilled laborer nowadays.”

On the other hand, there are half-baked ideas with regards to the education of the children. Ordubadi has often heard the following: “My child must become a doctor or lawyer.” But how the desired title is to be achieved leaves the parents clueless. “That is where they are helpless.” Ordubadi criticizes integration policies: “We have not identified the migrants’ need for a differentiated explanation.”

In nine months AMS will be able to speak the language of its target audience. A DVD in Turkish, among other languages, will then inform about the school system and job possibilities. This DVD will be shown in clubs and mosques, to the fathers who often still call the shots. It is actually just a harmless DVD. However, it does show the conflict about the right strategy of integration politics. Should institutions and social workers be respectful of cultures and languages of the migrants? People like Sarrazin probably think this is a waste of time.

Margit Wolf, managing director of Interface, a language institute offering German language courses like “Mama is learning German”, believes that “respect is very important”. When women apply for the German courses, their husbands usually accompany them. They are skeptical and want to know what is being taught. There would be no positive results if the culturally sensitive persuasion of the institute’s employees, argues Wolf. “We must give the men a feeling of security, that it is just a language course and that we are not mobilizing against them — the men.” She cannot comprehend the allegation of Turkish women not wanting to learn German. “Many of them come from a low education background. It is a big step for them to register for these courses.”

But still: taking stock of working women of migrant background, the situation is not a rosy one. The majority of Turkish women are at home, taking care of the household and rearing children on their own. While 40% of Turkish women work, it is more than two-thirds of Austrian women. At the same time these numbers are not surprising considering the fact that Turkish women give birth to more children than Austrian women: The latter 1.3 children, the former more than twice as many, 2.6. The family remains important for the entire lifespan. “Children are very important in our culture, “ says Ruhi Göler, who works at the Ankara Market in Brunnengasse (a district inhabited by a high number of Turks). But he is also concerned that many young men are growing up on the streets. “This is how they find bad friends,” Göler cites his fears. Sixteen-year-old Maki also prefers to meet his friends without his parents chaperoning, most often in the Millennium City (a shopping center in Vienna). He does not consider his friends a “gang” or even a “mob”. He says, “There is a lot going on there. My friends and I are simply hanging out.”

Turkish head to toe

Moving a few kilometers south, to the former workers’ district of Favoriten: It is not a district that is considered attractive to live in. But there are many Turkish shops in the vicinity of Quellenplatz and Reumannplatz. A butcher, a jeweler, a supermarket, and a furniture store: Even if one doesn’t speak good German, one can get around well in this area.

From this perspective it makes sense that the road to a German language course is a rocky one. “There are many women in my course who have lived in Austria for the last 20 or 30 years and who are attending a German language course for the first time,” reports one teacher who wants to remain anonymous. She teaches AMS-sponsored language courses in Favoriten. Three quarters of the women are Turkish and wear a headscarf. “They truly live in a parallel world: They are either at home or in the park, and shop only in Turkish shops,” the teacher tells us. The course is considered “a welcome diversion”; a job hunt, except as kitchen work or cleaning lady, is seldom successful.

Anthropologist Six-Hohenbalken does not want to use these words. She is afraid that talk of parallel societies will result in them arising. “This is how people are excluded from society and brought to seek contacts in only their surroundings.”

While local politics in Vienna seldom has anything to say about successful coexistence in Favoriten, the — Turkish — area surrounding the Brunnenmarkt in the district of Ottakring is considered a multicultural flagship project. The market is newly renovated, there is a cultural area, and rent prices have risen as a result of middle class Austrians moving into the area. City planners call this phenomenon “upgrading” or “gentrification”. The Austrians meet at Yppenplatz for their Saturday brunch in the city’s most famous Turkish restaurant and buy their groceries at the Brunnenmarkt (from Turkish shop owners). But still: even here is a parallel world between the Austrians and the Turks. A few words here or there during the shopping, nothing more. And there is hardly an Austrian who ventures to the Turkish cafes in the side streets.

Home country Austria.

Neydet Karasu is sitting at a table in the cafe Safak and is working on crossword from the newspaper Hürriyet. The television set is blasting Turkish news. Karasu is sixty years old, sometimes he has chest pains, perhaps because he had carry heavy loads during his job as deliveryman. He sees life in the district in a critical way. “If there are many Turks, everyone speaks only Turkish,” says he who wants to stay in Austria, his “second home country”. “One tends to forget German.”

Thirty-nine-year-old Dolunay Yerit moved to Brunnenmarkt only a short while ago. “Because of a large loft and the excellent infrastructure.” Sometimes the lawyer, who works for the Austrian Business Agency, wonders about her surroundings: “When I see women running around in harem pants, unable to speak a word of German, I think to myself ‘Something went wrong here’.” And why did it work out for her? Her upbringing was an open one, and although she spoke Turkish at home, her parents insisted on her learning German and getting a good education, as well as “consciously participating in society”. Yerit does not want to be seen as showcase Turk. She thinks that the lack of migrants in the public sphere or the media is a disadvantage. “There is a lack of role models.” Yerit’s own definition of integration: “Integration is a success if we no longer need to discuss it.”

Posted in Österreich, Islam, Islamisierung, Must Read, News | Leave a Comment »

Identity Crisis: Can European Civilization Survive?

Posted by paulipoldie on October 19, 2009

March 13 – 14, 2008, European University of Rome, Italy

by ESW

The European Freedom Alliance was established during the conference “Identity Crisis: Can European Civilization Survive?”, which was held in Rome. The Alliance is headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, and will develop and administer new programs and activities which advance and defend the cause of freedom and liberty in Europe. It will also administer a legal networking project and a scholarly and research institute that will conduct academic investigation into EU policies and actions.

The European Freedom Alliance is an organization which unites individuals and communities around the world who share a concern about the threats to freedom and liberty in Europe- the hub of Western civilization. The Alliance’s programs, publications, conferences and websites develop tools and strategies to counter the growing influence of ideologies and movements that threaten freedom and deny the sanctity of the personal conscience.

According to Avi Davis, the Alliance senior fellow and executive director, “Since September 11, we have witnessed an unprecedented demand in Europe and North America for minority rights and autonomy. As a result, a virtual code of silence has descended on Europe to address such issues as female genital mutilation, honor killings and the oppression of women within Muslim enclaves, for fear of offending Muslim sensitivities. Yet, the absence of any true outrage will have catastrophic consequences for the future of Western civilization and values. Such unquestioning moral relativism [was] one of the principle issues examined by the conference.”

The conference featured distinguished speakers such as Bat Ye’or, David Littman, Melanie Phillips, and Douglas Murray, among many others.

In his introductory speech, Avi Davis said, “Europe has become a continent wracked by internal contradictions. Convince of their status as avatars of genuine liberal democracy, European leaders are yet unwilling to confront or even recognize the successful rise of a supremacist ideology within their own borders; Having disavowed organized religion, Europeans nevertheless encourage– both wittingly and unwittingly– the spread of a religious dogma which challenges some of the basic liberties upon which their own civilization is founded; Eschewing any notion of value in American culture, the continent remains the United States’ most steadfast trading partner in cultural exchange, gobbling up American movies, television and music with a voraciousness that shows little sign of abating; Having enshrined welfare, health care and job tenure as universal rights, it has yet to realize that the institutional paralysis imposed by these programs will make it almost impossible for the continent to compete with the rising economies of China and India over the next fifty years.” He continued, “One has to wonder then whether Europe’s post-modern intellectual now views the Enlightenment as little more than one set of cultural prejudices, no better nor worse than any other, and inspiring no particular moral preference. Could it be that three thousand years of moral and intellectual development has exhausted itself in a miasma of doubt, intellectual inertia and self loathing? The collapse of a civilization begins when its denizens lose faith in their own future. Has that happened to Europe? If so, why has it happened and where does this leave its sister civilization in the United States? If Europe’s lamps are not yet extinguished, they are at risk of eclipse. In order to keep them lit, we require the courage and determination to ask hard questions about ourselves and the societies in which we live. Such commitment begins, in the Western enlightened tradition, with dialogue and debate.”

First Morning Panel: European conflicts and the threat to Western Civilization

Marcello Pera, an Italian politician and philosopher and former president of the Italian senate, Pera has become a leading opponent of post-modernism and cultural relativism and on this subject he resonates with religious thinkers, despite being an atheist himself. He sees European conflicts as being a threat to Western civilization. There are two risks and threats in Europe today:

  1. External: Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism

  2. Internal: Immigration and lack of integration,

all leading to a weakening of our tradition. We cannot fight without proclaiming our identity. Principles and values are the basics of our tradition. Political and intellectual Europe does not understand the risk properly. As a result, Europe responds as follows:

    • with passivity and appeasement

    • with multiculturalism

    • by concealing traditions, denying or even opposing them

    • by having a guilt complex that Europe is responsible for all the aggression and we deserve what we are currently undergoing.

Liberalism, according to Pera, means individuals are endowed with basic freedoms, self-evident truths, and personal rights. Today, though, because of democracy, we are voting on things that are non-negotiable, thereby placing doubt on these things. Democracy, equality of all people, is also weakened because doubt is cast by the government and aggressive minorities (such as feminists, gays, lesbians, etc.) on non-negotiable values. Pressure groups have become stronger. As a result, courts have become locomotives. Decisions are made in court, then parliament decides, and only then come customs, where it should be the other way around. Today, all values are equal and negotiable. Nothing is sacred. We can decide everything.

Referring to the Declaration of Independence, the Declaration of the Rights of Man, and The UN Charter on Human Rights, which guarantee that “The Republic recognizes the fundamental rights of Man”, Pera adds that today these fundamental rights are at risk.

Talking about tradition, he defended the Judeo-Christian tradition: Individuals, before belonging to a state, must be respected as humans. No one can deny the values of Judeo-Christian civilizations.

[Background information: Judeo-Christian is a term used to describe the body of concepts and values which are thought to be held in common by Judaism and adapted by Christianity, and typically considered by some (sometimes along with classical Greco-Roman civilization) a fundamental basis for Western legal codes and moral values. It implies a common set of values present in the modern Western World. The term has been criticized by some for suggesting more commonality than may actually exist. Adapted from Wikipedia]

Bat Ye’or responded by saying that Europe has entered the world of Jihad. However, we do have tools to combat this:

  • We must refuse blame

  • We must rediscover our identity

  • We must realize that there were crimes, but we are not the only ones who committed crimes.

Bat Ye’or sees the problem lying not only in the lack of faith , but also in our duty to help the young. It takes generations to fight this problem, but this is not yet clear to them. We must realize that this is their future and it is our duty to give them weapons to fight the problem.

In responding to Marcello Pera, Baroness Caroline Cox described three main conflicts in the UK today (although this is adaptable to the rest of Europe):

  1. Ideological conflict

    • There is no national identity

    • Muslims have no need to assimilate

    • If we have no vision, we perish

    • Young converts are looking for a coherent ideology = Islam

    • There is a spiritual and moral vacuum

  1. Political conflict:

    • Sharia law is already present, in its own form

    • Sharia courts present to provide for marriage

    • Rise in honor-related violence; police are compliant by sending girls who have run away back to their parents, sometimes up to ten times.

  1. Economic conflict:

    • State funding of military conflicts

    • Sharia-compliance in financial transactions

Second Morning Panel: Geo-Strategies of the Muslim World

Bat Ye’or described what she calls Soft Jihad.

Consists of propaganda, corruption, and the use of petrodollars. Soft Jihad operates through the lack of information from the media, induces feelings of guilt. While it developed in the last thirty years, it is related to strong migration with the threat of terrorist attacks when there is resistance. The OIC (Organization of Islamic Conference) does not recognize countries and thus Europe’s right to its own laws. Our governments obey all requests from OIC.

Baroness Caroline Cox added in her response that European politicans are not thinking strategically.

Muslims have an ideological agenda. They undermine confidence in our heritage. Even the BBC is now pro-Islam and anti-Christian.

They also have an economic agenda. There are large-scale investments in developing countries, which means Islam is thinking economic: jobs are created, micro-credits are provided if you convert. There is investment in schools and healthcare if you convert. Orphanages are funded in Sudan if Christian children convert.

The political agenda happens through conversion. Politicians convert and thus attract the Muslim vote.

The military agenda takes place in Sudan with the military takeover; in Nigeria with churches being burned; and in Ambon, Indonesia (sectarian violence, against Christians, in 1999).

What can we do?, asks Baroness Cox.

  • We should build brigdes where it is worth it.

  • We should think strategically.

  • We should think culturally: build schools, do training, to study Western curricula.

  • We should think economically: use Western capital to invest.

  • We should think politically: We have to strengthen politicans.

Above all: We must raise awareness!

First afternoon panel: Internal threats to European survival: Multiculturalism and the impact of cultural and moral relativism upon European identity.

Multiculturalism: A powerful force, it is the opposite of liberalism, means putting on blinds. The muliticulturalist sees himself as the enemy of racism. Multiculturalism is the guarding faith of teachers in schools and journalists and it forbids honest thinking because it preaches that we have no right to judge anyone and anything.

Douglas Murray is a British neo-conservative freelance journalist and political writer from Lewis, Scotland. He is currently the Director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, a right-wing think-tank which focuses solely on Islamic extremism in the UK. He spoke about multiculturalism being an anti-western ideology. It is opposed to the European people. Westerners are born into guilt, but everyone else is guilt-free. He believes the key issue to be freedom of speech.

Melanie Phillips, a British journalist, writes for the Daily Mail and the London Jewish Chronicle and published “Londonistan”, an analysis of the British failure to confront radical Islam.

The UK is the battleground of beliefs. Islamists are interested in strength and weaknesses and we are showing weakness. Britain was the first into the enlightenment, and it is the first out.

In her opinion, in multiculturalism all values are relative. This is the cause of the Islamists’ disdain. Multiculturalism is one of the most important weapons of the Islamists. It is illiberal and intolerant. As a result, the majority is seen as intolerant.

The effects are:

  • Children are stranded in the desert without a map. There is no culture of national self-respect. Children of immigrants are stranded between two worlds: British lifestyle and unsophisticated parents and family.

  • Multiculturalism forbids any discussion of forced marriages and cousin marriages.

  • Propaganda: the majority’s self-defense is racism. Victim and victimizer have roles reversed.

The deal is: minorities are welcome but minorites need to understand our law. The majority makes the law!

Melanie Phillips added that the mainstream media demonizes and deligitimizes Israel. She also spoke portrayal of Israel in the UK media.

Flemming Rose, the cultural editor of the Danish daily Jyllands Posten, in his speech said that tolerance was originally seen as the right to free speech. Today it is used to stifle free speech, by saying “we are intolerant if we publish cartoons.” Tolerance is not required for the one delivering, but for the one at the receiving end.

Posted in Berichte von Konferenzen, Conference Reports | 1 Comment »

20 Things You Should Know About Islam

Posted by paulipoldie on October 15, 2009


Frequent Infidel Bloggers Alliance commenter Religion of Pieces wrote a piece called 20 Things You Need To Know About Islam. The points he makes are important, and I know each of them to be factually true to some extent. However, I did not have links to back up each of his points, so I asked him to provide them.

Ordinarily, our posts here include embedded links. However, it would take a massive amount of work to embed all the links Religion of Pieces provided us with. So, this post will look a bit different, a bit more sloppy than our everyday posts.

Think of the links as a series of footnotes to back up each assertion Religion of Pieces makes.

Additionally, let me say that I have not had time to go through everyone of the many links ROP has provided. So, at the outset, I must tell you that the views and opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect those of myself, or Infidel Bloggers Alliance in general.

However, I do think this is a very important post, and I am considering serializing it and laying each individual point into our sidebar as permanent links. For now, check out Religion of Pieces very lengthy post:

Islam …

1) Is a mind-control and information-control cult founded by a murderer, torturer, brigand, rapist and pedophile called Mohammed.

The mind-control and information-control aspects require that all criticism be silenced.Mind and information control:

Telegraph article

Mohammed’s criminality:
http://www.angelfire.com/de/knowledgeoftruth/muhammed.html http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate/playboy.html

Mohammed’s pedophilia:

Silencing criticism:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2092-2058502,00.html http://www.danielpipes.org/article/321

2) Islam is Mohammed’s personality cult. Has no foundations other than Mo’s murderous rantings (Koran and Hadith).

The Koran consists of two conflicting parts – Meccan and Medinan (peaceful and violent respectively). The Medinan stuff supersedes (‘abrogates’) the Meccan stuff. Muslims act Medinan, but quote Meccan verses to the gullible infidels.

Mohammed as a cult leader:

Meccan and Medinan verses:
http://jimball.com.au/features/Myth-of-moderate-Islam.htm http://www.islamreview.com/articles/madinasuras.shtml

3) Claims to worship the same God as Christians and Jews, but in fact worships Allah – a demonic channelling through Mohammed’s psychopathic ego. The Death Cult mixes garbled versions of Christian and Jewish scriptures with pagan practices such as moon and meteorite-worship, and cut-throat blood sacrifice of animals and non-believers.

Allah and God:

Origins of the koran:
http://www.ninetyandnine.com/Archives/20020211/review.htm http://www.prophetofdoom.net/chapter.aspx?g=401&i=41003

Allah’s pagan daughters:

Meteorite worship:

Animal sacrifice to Allah:

Human sacrifice to Allah:
http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=1501 ,
Bangladesh Web.com

4) Has no rational, philosophical nor theological basis, and the whole belief-system is contradicted by science, philosophy, commonsense, human decency and internal inconsistency.

Flat earth:

Contradictions in the koran:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/islam.html http://www.geocities.com/lone_wolf_gc/earth_shape.html

5) Cannot withstand rational criticism. Can only spread and maintain itself by ignorance, illiteracy, war, terrorism, and intimidation. Islam has bloody borders and cannot co-exist peacefully with other belief systems. Winston Churchill said that Islam in a man is as dangerous as hydrophobia (rabies) in a dog.


Islamic intellectual achievements:

Intimidation against criticism and apostasy:

Bloody borders: http://chromatism.net/bloodyborders/

Intrinsically violent:
Islam Review article
http://www.islamreview.com/articles/poorislamists.shtml http://www.angelfire.com/moon/yoelnatan/koranwarpassages.htm http://www.citizensoldier.org/winthewar.html


6) Has a superstitious dread of images of pigs, crosses, Buddhas, Saint George (and his flag) and of course Motoons.Buddhas, crosses and teddy bears:

Piggy Banks Offend Muslims
CNN Article

Study of Revenge cartoon

Saint George:
Red Cross

7) Regards Islamic women as semihuman. Wife-beating, incest and child abuse (including mufa’khathat or ‘thighing’ – the ritual abuse of infants) are encouraged.

Treatment of women:

Infant abuse and ‘thighing’:
Truth Seeker article
Ken Lydell article
Hindu Unity

8) Regards all unbelievers (Kaffirs, Kuffar, Kufrs, Kafirs) as ritually unclean subhumans to be killed, subjugated, enslaved, exploited or parasitised. Kafirs are described by the Arabic word ‘najis’ – literally ‘filth’. That’s why Muslim hatred of Kafirs is intrinsic to their ‘religion’. A Kafir doesn’t need to DO anything to offend a Muslim, his very existence is enough of an affront.

Najis kafirs:
Cartoon Nazi article

Treatment of kafirs:

Enslavement of kaffirs:

9) The ethical system applies only to Muslims. Allah encourages rape, pillage, extortion and enslavement of non-Muslims. Morality does not extend beyond the global gang (ummah). Muslim ethics are the ethics of the Mafia.

Loyalty to the Umma first (Ummafia)

Sixth Column article

Massacre, rape, pillage and enslavement:
Hindu Unity Article
Berean article

10) Allah’s followers are motivated by hatred, greed and lust. There is no love, mercy or compassion. Allah is vindictive, unpredictable, capricious and devious – “Allah leads astray whom he pleases”.

Hate cult:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27938 http://www.iranian.ws/cgi-bin/iran_news/exec/view.cgi/2/3626

Women as plunder:


Allah – Father of Lies:

11) The only religion NOT founded on The Golden Rule. Morality is based on Mohammed’s example. If Mohammed did it then it’s OK for all Muslims. Hence the encouragement of rape, pillage, subjugation and murder of non-believers and the institutionalised pedophilia prevalent throughout Muslim society (justified by Mohammed’s activities with Ayesha, his child sex-slave – see and listen to http://islamcomicbook.com/lyrics1.htm).

Golden Rule:

Mohammed as the example of ‘the perfect man’:
Chronicles Magazine article

Institutionalised pedophilia:
http://www.cathud.com/LINKS/pages_GL/Islam.htm http://www.nospank.net/glazov.htm

Jihadic rape:
Fjordman article

12) All human relations are defined by Dominance/Subjugation. Muslims have schizoid inferiority/superiority complexes. (A well-balanced Muslim is one with a chip on each shoulder). They respect strength but despise compromise as weakness. Appeasement invites more aggression. The only political system which has been strong enough to subjugate Islam is Stalinism.

Honor/shame, dominance and subjugation:

Dr. Sanity article

Inferiority complex:


13) Polygamy ensures alpha-males get extra women, leading to a shortage of women for the betas. Beta-males must either jerk off (a sin leading to hell), or form dog-packs and rape or capture kafir women as booty in a razzia, or else self-destruct in the presence of infidels then they can screw 72 mythical virgins in Allah’s bordello in the sky (see and listen to http://islamcomicbook.com/lyrics3.htm).

Beta-males are often encouraged by their relatives to become suicide bombers because of the belief that such murderous ‘martyrs’ will be able to intercede with Allah to take 70 of their relatives to paradise with them.Polygamy and Jihad: http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleID.18649/article_detail.asp

Muslim rape:


Bomber’s relatives go to paradise:
Memri.org article

14) Lying and deception of infidels (taqiyya) is encouraged. This may take many forms, including outright lies, feigned moderation, and condemnation of terrorist attacks to the Kaffir while rejoicing with fellow Muslims. Muslims often tend to regard themselves as victims of some group of Kafirs so they can harbor grudges against them and against Kafirs in general.

Individuals may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and must be considered potential killers who can flip in an instant (SJS -‘Sudden Jihad Syndrome’).


Muslim victimology
Real Clear Politics article

Sudden Jihad Syndrome
Lost Budgie article

15) Muslims are forbidden to befriend Kaffirs except for purposes of deceit or where conversion may be possible.


16) The Koran is Allah’s final word and cannot be changed or challenged. To do so is punishable by death. Consequently, the Death Cult can never change or be reformed. The instructions to murder and rape infidels are just as valid now as the day they were written.

Since Islam cannot be modernised, the Muslims are attempting to Islamise modernity. This requires spreading Islam in the West and simultaneously preventing any criticism of the cult by intimidation and PC legislation to curtail freedom of expression.

Koran as literal word of Allah: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4048586,00.html

Koranic principles of jihad:

Intimidation and censorship:
Telegraph article

17) Treaties and agreements with Kaffirs are made to be broken (Hudna). The word of a Muslim to a Kafir counts for nothing in the eyes of Allah. Allah is The Father Of Lies.


18) The world is divided between Dar-al-Islam and Dar-al-Harb (the domain of war, the Kufr lands). Muslims living in Dar-al-Harb must work to disrupt their host nations until these can be brought into Dar-al-Islam.

Dar al Harb and the Umma:

http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=2601 http://www.ucg.org/commentary/madridbombings.htm

19) Muslims have no obligation to their host nations and in fact are encouraged to parasitise them. Welfare fraud, identity theft, forgery etc are endemic in Western Muslim populations, and serious crime against Kaffirs is regarded as normal and justified. Extortion rackets against Kafirs are mandated by the Koran (‘jizya’ is the Arabic term for ‘protection money’ payable by Jews and Christians to Muslims).

Subversion and disloyalty:
Muslim Leaders And Subversion
Muslim Reaction to Suicide Bombings

Free Republic/Pedestrian Infidel Post

Jizya extortion
Ken Lydell article

The Muslim liability and welfare dependence: http://www.islamreview.com/articles/westsunmanageable.shtml
Amren article

20) The Jihadi attack on the host nation isn’t just against its religion and economy, but is aimed at its very cultural identity. Islam is a complete system, including a culture, which Muslims regard as superior (despite all evidence to the contrary) to other cultures.

Muslims are therefore required to destroy the symbols of ‘Jahiliya’ (sometimes sp. Jahiliyya) – non-Muslim culture. In the East this has included destruction of Hindu temples and Christian churches and replacement with mosques, and destruction of Buddhist artwork and universities and replacement with heaps of rubble. This process of cultural replacement is now beginning in the West..

Destruction of Hindu and Buddhist Culture:


Posted in Islam, Islamisierung, Islamophobia, Must Read | 17 Comments »

Destabilizing Western Society Through Import Brides, Polygamy, Islamist Terrorism and Crime

Posted by paulipoldie on October 15, 2009



October 12, 2009 – San Francisco, CA – PipeLineNews.org – The number of so-called Muslim “import brides” is rapidly increasing in the Netherlands. There are now over 15,000 of them. Most of these young women are poorly educated teen-age girls from Turkey, Morocco or Somalia. They are forced by their parents to marry usually older relatives or Moroccan, Turkish or Somali immigrants in Holland. Eberhard van der Laan, the Dutch government Minister of Housing, Communities and Integration, now says things are getting out of control. “We can’t cope with it anymore.” The rapid influx of these import brides “leads to crime, fraud, domestic violence, polygamy and slavery,” he says. In other words, it is a trend which contributes to the destabilization of society.

In a belated attempt to stop the influx import brides, the Dutch government recently announced a number of restrictive measures. It is no longer permitted in Holland to marry a woman who is not yet 18 years old. These marriages are often concluded in Morocco or Turkey. Moreover, male immigrants who want to marry a young woman from their home country must not have any crime record, nor are marriages between cousins or between uncles and nieces – very common in Turkey – allowed anymore.

Eberhard van der Laan belongs to the leftist Dutch Labor Party (PvdA). It is this party that is largely responsible for failed immigration policies of the last three years. The previous center-right coalition government of Christian-Democrats (CDA) and the conservative liberal Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) which ruled between 2003 and 2007, took a tough stance on immigration and successfully curbed blatant abuses. The number of import brides went down, so did the number of asylum-seekers. The introduction of the following requirements then showed immediate results: an immigrant who wants to marry a young woman from his home county must have sufficient income to support her (120 percent of the minimum wage), and import brides under the age of 21 are no longer allowed into the country. These rules were relaxed, however, after the new center-leftist coalition government of Christian-Democrats and the Dutch Labor Party was formed in February 2007. Deputy Justice Minister Nebahat Albayrak (a second-generation Turkish immigrant and a member of the Labor Party) immediately pardoned some 27,000 asylum-seekers who came before 2001 but whose applications had been rejected repeatedly by Dutch courts. This proved to be another fatal mistake. As a result of the relaxation of immigration rules, the number of new asylum applications increased dramatically and is now even stretching the Dutch budget as a whole. It is, for example, no longer possible to pay the basic state pension for people aged 65 and over – the so-called AOW – when you become 65 years old. The age for receiving this pension will now gradually be increased from 65 to 67.

The case of Fayza Oum’Hamed

Until she was sixteen years old, Fayza Oum’Hamed lived happily in a village near the city of Nador in Northern Morocco. Her parents were neither rich nor poor. At home, she often watched Algerian TV news reports and was shocked by the brutal murders committed by Islamist terrorists. They killed the Algerian television journalist Ismail whom she deeply admired. This courageous journalist had severely criticized the Islamist terrorists, saying that “real jihad” means: Do not bow to the terrorists. There were millions of viewers. Fayza was just one of them and now she wanted to become a journalist herself. She spoke French and Arab, as well as, of course, her own Berber language.

Then came the fateful day that two bearded Moroccan men and a Moroccan woman from Holland arrived in her village. They were Haj Azzelarab, his wife and their son Bilal. Both men did not have jobs in Holland but were dependent on welfare, yet Bilal and his brothers made a lot of money in the black market and other illegal activities. (Cheating the Dutch welfare system by Moroccan immigrants is not exceptional in Holland and this has been going on for years now.) In Fayza’s village near Nador Haj Azzelarab and his son Bilal made the impression of being very rich. They also claimed to be strict Muslims and “faithful people.” It was not difficult for them to convince Fayza’s father to give his daughter away in marriage although she was not yet 16 years old. Bilal was to be Fayza’s future husband. No one asked Fayza if she wanted to marry that stranger from Holland. She was supposed to respect the honor of her family, obey her father and marry Bilal. But Fayza did not want to. She was then forced to marry Bilal against her will. After a few Moroccan officials had been bribed – Fayza was still too young – the marriage was concluded immediately.

For Fayza the wedding night was a nightmare. Bilal was a brute who took away her virginity by behaving as if he raped her. When he did not succeed the first time because Fayza naturally was too tense, a black magician was consulted. Just like many sub-Saharan Africans, a lot of Moroccans believe in black magic and witchcraft. The black magician told Bilal: “There are evil spirits at work here – ‘sihr’.” Angry Bilal then went back to the bedroom and brutally tried to force himself into her once again. Now he was successful. Fayza’s mother-in-law proudy showed a small piece of cloth tainted with Fayza’s blood to other family members. “They looked like vampires,” Faysa wrote more than eight years later.

Bilal and his father promised that they would return the following year and that there would be a Dutch residence permit for Fayza. They did return but without the promised Dutch residence permit. So they somehow smuggled Fayza illegally into Holland. Bilal did have his own apartment in Amsterdam but he allowed two illegal Moroccan immigrants – friends of his – to live there. This, too, was totally against the law, of course. So he actually lived with his father and mother in Amsterdam East and Fayza had to join him there. Bilal’s father was a brute, too. He frequently intimidated and beat his daughter-in-law. Imitating his father, Bilal used to beat Fayza, too. She was not allowed to go out but had to stay indoors all day. Even talking to the neighbors was out of the question. Writing letters to family members in Morocco? No way.

On top of that, young Fayza was forced to wear the Islamic veil and adhere to the strict Islamic dress code, even when it was hot at home. She detested this and began to hate hypocritical fundamentalist Muslims for whom lying is second nature. She once discovered that Mr. Azzalarab was secretly watching a porn movie – naked women – on Dutch TV. When he noticed that she had seen him doing so, the dirty old man quickly switched channels.

Her marriage in Morocco, of course, was not valid under Dutch law. She had to wait till she was 18 years old, and then she was again forced to marry Bilal but now in accordance with Dutch law. She also obtained a Dutch passport.

Fayza quickly noticed that Bilal’s Moroccan family was anything but poor, although her husband and her father-in-law were both receiving welfare money from the Dutch government. Bilal was working illegally in the black market and one of Bilal’s brothers was serving a prison sentence. Gradually it dawned upon her that she was nothing but a domestic slave – in a free country known for the emancipation of women! It was only natural that she began to long for freedom. After she had given birth to a son and a daughter, she finally managed to escape. For eight years she had been been beaten and terrorized by her husband as well as her father-in-law. Her mother-in-law was completely subservient to this evil family “tradition” of dominant violent males at home. The first thing Fayza did after having left her husband was to put off the oppressive Muslim veil – to get rid of it. She could not understand why many Muslim women in Holland were (and increasingly still are) attached to this custom. She and her sisters never used to wear the veil in Morocco. But these unpleasant Moroccan fundamentalists in Holland forced her to adhere to the Islamic dress code. Meanwhile, her father-in-law, a so-called pious Muslim, was watching pornographic movies on TV. So did at least two of the 9/11 hijackers on the eve of 9/11. And not so few young Moroccan males in Holland, Belgium and France run prostitution networks.

There was a divorce and Fayza is now living freely and happily with her children. She still feels betrayed by her father who once gave her away to a brute like Bilal. Unfortunately, this is not exceptional in Morocco or Holland. There are many other “Faysas,” not just in Morocco but also in Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Berlin, Brussels, Paris, Lyon, Marseilles, Madrid and Barcelona. That is why Fayza wrote a book describing in detail her ordeal – domestic violence, horror and slavery in Amsterdam, the capital of a free country. “I will kill you, you bitch, you whore!” Bilal told her more than once. He even claimed to have a pistol. He also used to beat his own (as well as Fayza’s) children who were terrified both of him and his father.

Fayza and her two children are now well integrated Moroccan immigrants in the Netherlands. She went to college and found a good job. This is how it should have been from the very beginning. Fayza strongly criticizes oppressive Moroccan and Muslim “honor” traditions in her book “De Uitverkorene” (“The chosen one”). These traditions have been imported by immigrants from backward cultures. There are western liberals who claim we must even show understanding for these evil traditions. All too often honor crimes are nothing but plain murder. In Holland, a Pakistani woman named Hameeda Lakho wrote several books about child beating. She had been beaten numerous times by her violent and aggressive father, a Pakistani immigrant in the Netherlands. The same man was also beating his own wife, and then sent her back to Pakistan. Hameeda, too, criticizes Pakistani traditions of “honor” – which invariably imply that aggressive males are given free reign to terrorize their defenseless female victims – wives, daughters, even babies.

Import brides and domestic violence: also a huge problem in England

“Import brides” and domestic violence are not just a huge problem in the Netherlands but also in Belgium, Germany, Britain, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the United States, Canada and Australia. British journalist Sue Lloyd Roberts has been investigating this issue since the late 1990s. Several of her BBC TV reports were edited by me and aired on Dutch television as well. She focussed on Pakistan and found out that quite a number of young British girls of Pakistani origin are forced by their parents to marry a cousin in Pakistan. These cousins then usually apply to enter the United Kingdom. Similarly, British males of Pakistani origin travel to Pakistan to marry a young woman from a village and then take her to Britain. These often backward Pakistani women do not speak English, nor do they know anything about western society and their rights there. Once in Britain, their husbands often beat them, forcing them to wear the Islamic veal or the black “Niqab” while allowing themselves all kinds of sexual liberties such as watching pornographic movies. (As one of the victims said.) Sue Lloyd Roberts describes the case of Kaheema, a young westernized Pakistani woman in Britain. She was taken to Pakistan by her parents “to attend a cousins wedding” only to find that the wedding being prepared by her extended family was in fact her own. She tried refusing the cousin chosen for her but was physically beaten into submission. She tried to escape. “What would happen if your parents know you were trying to escape,” Sue Lloyd Roberts asked her. “They would kill me,” she replied.

What is at stake here is the above mentioned “family honor.” Honor crimes are quite common among immigrants from the Middle East, Turkey, North Africa, Pakistan or Bangladesh. The London Times reported in October 2004 “that women brought from abroad, notably from Bangladesh to marry a British Muslim have been victims of honor killings by their families after being sent home, when the relationship has failed.”

Another issue in Britain is polygamy. The London Times reported “that up to 4000 British Muslim men have entered into polygamous marriages, some of them keeping as many as five wives.” According Dr. Daniel Pipes, an American expert on Islam, “a Scottish judge recently bent the law to benefit a polygamous household.” There are now 15,000-20,000 harems in Italy, 30,000 harems in France and 50,000 to 100,000 polygamists in the United States and social acceptance is growing. “Islamists argue polygamy’s virtues and call for official recognition,” Pipes observed in November 2008.

Domestic violence and polygamy: an adverse effect on children

Domestic violence and polygamy are bound to have an adverse effect on children. Anthony Storr, a British psychiatrist who studied “human destructiveness,” makes the following interesting observation: “One factor in the production of aggressive psychopaths is the absence of loving care from parents in early childhood.” If “paranoia” comes into play as well, the end result may be very disastrous indeed. Today’s children might then be tomorrow’s murderers and terrorists. By far most terrorists and murderers are males. “Male sexuality and aggression are intimately linked,” says Storr. It is by no means coincidental, therefore, that societies where “honor” and “male dominated family relationships” are the rule rather than the exception often produce Islamist terrorists, suicide bombers, drug criminals and murderers of women and children. (See, for example, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia and Mexico.) Immigrants from these violent societies often take their cultural and religious baggage with them. Unfortunately, only a minority of them are able and willing to “westernize.”

It is not very helpful either that the number of non-western immigrants in some western cities now partly exceeds the number of original (native) inhabitants. It is not just Muslim cultures that should be addressed here. The violent macho culture of Latin American societies (Mexico, Colombia, etc.) has already infected whole neighborhoods in US and Canadian cities. Similarly, Amsterdam South-East is now virtually a no-go area where gun and knife crime, drug trafficking and other forms of crime abound. More than 90 percent of the inhabitants living in these neighborhoods are immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa, the Dutch Antilles and Surinam, a former Dutch colony. One of them is a Nigerian man named Solomon Osaikhwuwuomwan. He is currently on trial for his alleged role in a Nigerian criminal gang involved in female trafficking and prostitution. (Just a few days ago, I was present at the trial when Josephine, a terrified victim of the gang, testified against Solomon and another Nigerian man.) Many of the violent and aggressive Antillean and Surinamese youths in Amsterdam South-East are growing up in single parent families. To a large extend, Antillean culture, too, is dominated by dissatisfied macho males and violent rap music. Indeed, the battle for western values is being waged right now, and there is no one who can tell us if we in the West are going to win it. This battle won’t be over very soon. It’s a battle for freedom, our freedom.

Two-thirds of MI5 annual budget goes to countering Islamist terrorism

Western societies are gradually being undermined by the unabated flow of immigrants from Muslim countries and sub-Saharan Africa – by migrant trafficking and the continued Islamist threat. A recent and authoritative study on the British Security Service MI5 written by Professor Christopher Andrew, a British historian, claims that two-thirds of Security Service resources are devoted to countering Islamist terrorism, “by far the greatest threat to national security.” Former MI5 Director-General Elizabeth Manningham-Buller said in December 2005: “We will continue to stop most terrorist attacks, but we will not stop all of them.”

The Security Service was quite lucky in September 2000 – just one year before the 9/11 attacks. “Thanks to its counter-proliferation operations the Security Service – without realizing it at the time – succeeded in disrupting an attempt by Al-Qaeda to develop biological weapons (BW),” Andrew now reveals for the first time. Professor Andrew, a known expert on intelligence, had exclusive access to MI5 files. He writes that Pakistani microbiologist Rauf Ahmad “attended a conference in Britain on pathogens, where he sought samples from other delegates as well as help in obtaining a bioreactor and cell counter.” MI5 was alerted to his activities and searched his lugguage. After 9/11, it transpired that Dr. Ahmad had been ordered by Ayman Al-Zawahiri, Al-Qaeda’s number two, to procure equipment, cultures and training for BW production. (The first time I saw Ayman Al-Zawahiri’s name surface in a confidential document was back in 1996.)

Between 2000 and June 2007, the UK security authorities have investigated at least sixteen Islamist terrorist plots, many of which were directly or indirectly linked to Pakistan. Major terrorist plots have also been disrupted in France, Italy, Belgium, Germany, the United States, Canada and Australia. In virtually all of these cases those involved in the plots were Muslim extremists or radicalized converts to Islam. In their silly adoration of death and destruction, young Somali immigrants living in peaceful Minneapolis returned to Somalia to wage jihad. Some have blown themselves up in suicide attacks. Other aggressive and paranoid psychopaths may be planning suicide attacks on US territory – as a way of saying thanks to the very society that welcomed and sheltered them. Why, then, did they leave their home country in the first place? And should these so-called asylum-seekers or refugees be welcomed in ever larger numbers?

In Germany the Federal Crime Police Office (BKA) has to monitor at least 180 Muslim extremists who already received or plan to receive training in a terrorist training camp. About 85 of these Muslim extremists are still in Pakistan/Afghanistan, or somewhere else. There are more than 200 terrorist investigations. So far, German authorities have arrested only 15 Islamist terrorists. Once of them was Aleem Nasir. Last July, Nasir was convicted to eight years by a German court in Koblenz. He was trained by Al-Qaeda – an extremely dangerous fellow whose network extended all over Germany.

The problem of Islamist terrorism would be virtually nonexistent if there would not be large Muslim immigrant communities in Europe, North America and Australia. I am sure that most Muslim immigrants reject extremism and terrorism. Yet, polls showed that a striking number of them applauded the 9/11 attacks in America or showed a degree of understanding for these attacks. Indeed, only a minority of Muslims are really moderate, “liberal” or sufficiently westernized. Few dare to criticize their own religion or even the Koran itself, says Farish Noor. He is a moderate Muslim from Malaysia who now attacks his own government for planning to lash a woman for drinking a beer. Noor also criticizes Barack Obama’s understanding of the Koran: “It is not just love, love, love, it is not John Lennon who wrote the Koran.” “Quoting selectively from the Koran is ridiculous,” says Noor. He knows what he he talking about – much better than Obama at least.

Emerson Vermaat is a Dutch investigative reporter specialized in crime and terrorism. Website: emersonvermaat.com.


De Telegraaf (Amsterdam), October 3, 2009, p. 1 (“Drempel voor importbruid weer omhoog”); de Volkskrant (Amsterdam), October 3, 2009, p. 3 (“Regels voor migratiehuwelijk worden verder aangescherpt”); NRC Handelsblad (Rotterdam), October 3, 2009, p. 3 (“Regels voor importbruid aangescherpt”); Dutch TV and radio news reports, October 2 and 3, 2009.

Fayza Oum’Hamed, De Uitverkorene. Een importbruid acht jaar lang opgesloten in Nederland (Amsterdam: Artemis & Co, 2009). Watching Algerian TV, see: p. 21; Father-in-law Azzelarab, a strict Muslim, watching a porn movie on Dutch TV, see: p. 66; on black magic, see: p. 58, 59, 98, 154; Bilal’s brother has a criminal record, see: p. 85; on “family honor”, see, for example: p. 54, 59, 96; on removing the Islamic veil, see: p. 128; on welfare money, black market money and big expensive cars, see: p. 51, 62, 85, 192; Bilal beating Fayza, saying “I’ll kill you, you dirty whore!”, see: p. 110-115, 117. The name “Fayza” means “the chosen one” (“uitverkorene” in Dutch).

Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport 2002 (The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, 2002), p. 312 (abuse of Dutch welfare system by Moroccan immigrants). According to a 2002 estimate, this was costing the Dutch taxpayer 750 million euros. It is also a tremendous problem in Belgium.

Gilles Kepel, The War for Muslim Minds. Islam and the West (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004), p. 107. “Two of Atta’s comrades, who watched a pay-perview porn film in their motel room on the night of September 10 – hardly an act of Muslim piety…”

Hameeda Lakho, Geheim Geweld. Een openhartig en persoonlijk boek over de gevolgen van kindermishandeling (Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Arena, 2006), p. 31 (Father was beating my mother), p. 142 (Father tells his young daughter Hameeda: “I’ll kill you!”).

Sue Lloyd Roberts, On the run, in: The Independent, May 31, 2000.

Lewis Smith, Muslim men use law loophole to get a harem of “wives”, Timesonline, October 21, 2004.

Daniel Pipes, Westerners Welcome Harems, November 28, 2008 (Internet, pdf, http://www.unitedcopts.org).

Anthony Storr, Human Destructiveness (London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1972), p. 39 (“aggressive psychopaths”), p. 56 (“male sexuality”), p. 109 (“the paranoid attitude leads to murder”).

NRC Weekblad, October 3-9, 2009, p. 12-17 (“Groeten uit Holendrecht”); author’s file on West-African and Antillean crime networks in Amsterdam South-East; Dutch and Dutch Antillean (Curacao) police records.

Author’s notes during a session of the so-called “Koolvis” court case (eleven Nigerians in the Netherlands, suspected of female trafficking and running a prostitution network, currently on trial), Zwolle (Netherlands), October 7, 2009.

Christopher Andrew, The Defence of the Realm. The Authorized History of MI5 (London: Allen Lane, 2009), p. 808, 809 (BW), p. 826, 827 (Two-thirds of Security Service resources), p. 851 (BW).

Home-grown Terrorism. What does it mean for Business?, p. 19 (London: Lloyds and IISS, 2008). Sixteen Islamist terrorist plots.

Der Spiegel, September 26, 2009, p. 22-26 (“Terrorismus: Langsame Eskalation”). On the BKA and the case of Aleem Nasir.

Interview Farish Noor (by Kustaw Bessems), Stop met die dialoog, het is zo zinloos, in: Dagblad De Pers, October 9, 2009, p. 8, 9. Mr. Bessems is a bright young Dutch journalist who has followed Islamist activities and websites since 2001.

©2009 Emerson Vermaat. All rights reserved.

Posted in Islamization | 3 Comments »

The Leftist Politics of the Nobel Peace Prize, Part 2

Posted by paulipoldie on October 13, 2009


by John Perazzo


For Part 1 of this blog series, click here.

The Nobel Committee’s proclivity for using its Peace Prize ceremony as a forum for ridiculing American foreign policy was on display again in 2001, when the Prize was given to the United Nations and its Secretary General, Kofi Annan. When presenting the award to Mr. Annan, Nobel Committee leader Gunnar Berge argued that the establishment of peaceful change in the 21st Century would “be a task for the UN, if not in the form of a centralized world government then at least as the more efficient global instrument which the world so sorely needs.” Berge attacked the Bush administration specifically, saying that “the USA provides the clearest illustration” of a country “selective in their attitudes to the UN,” only favoring “an active UN when they need and see opportunities to obtain its support; but when the UN takes a different stance, they seek to limit its influence.” Soon thereafter the world would learn that Kofi Annan and the UN alike were up to their respective necks in scandal involving the Oil-For-Food program.


In 2000 the award went to South Korean President Kim Dae-jung, who, solely to bolster his chances of winning the Nobel Peace Prize, bribed North Korea’s government with $1.5 billion in exchange for the latter’s feigned good-faith participation in peace talks ostensibly aimed at ending Pyongyang’s nuclear program.


A year earlier the Nobel Peace Prize was given to Médecins Sans Frontières, a humanitarian aid organization that more than once has condemned Israel – in contradiction to its pledge to maintain political independence.


In 1994 the Nobel Peace Prize Committee drew a moral equivalence between statesmen and a terrorist when presenting its award jointly to Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, and the Palestinian leader whose unwavering goal was the destruction of Israel and the mass murder of Jews, Yasser Arafat.


The 1992 Nobel Peace Prize recipient was Rigoberta Menchu, the leftist icon and communist agent who falsely claimed authorship of a 1982 autobiography which was later found to have been written by the French Marxist Elisabeth Burgos-Debray.

In 1987 the award went to Costa Rican President Oscar Arias Sánchez, who, in order “to bring peace to the region,” reversed the policy of his predecessor who had allowed the Reagan administration to use northern Costa Rica as a base for its war efforts against the Marxist Sandinistas.

The 1985 Nobel Peace Prize was given to International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, (IPPNW), a group founded with the explicit involvement of the Soviet dictatorship. In fact, Yevgeny Chazov, Soviet Deputy Minister of Health, served as one of IPPNW’s three co-chairmen.


In 1984 Archbishop Desmond Tutu won the Prize for his work against South African apartheid. Tutu was a strong supporter of Winnie Mandela, who was prominent in the Soviet-sponsored African National Congress, closely aligned with the South African Communist Party. Today Tutu claims that U.S. injustices around the world provoked the attacks of 9/11; that America is an aggressive nation which spends too much on defense and too little on aid to the poor; and that “Israel is like Hitler and apartheid.”

Posted in Brainwashing, Must Read, News | Leave a Comment »