Mission Europa Netzwerk Karl Martell

What a Mosque Really Is – Vijay Kumar explains

Posted by paulipoldie on July 11, 2010

by Vijay Kumar
had been shared by polytheists, Christians, Jews, and Hindus, honoring 360 different deities. In
630 A.D. the Kaaba was captured by Islam in its military invasion and conquest of Mecca.
On the day of its capture, Muhammad delivered an address at the Kaaba in military dress and
helmet, according to Ayatullah Ja’far Subhani in his book, “The Message”:
“Bear in mind that every claim of privilege, whether that of blood or
property is abolished . . . I reject all claims relating to life and property and
all imaginary honors of the past, and declare them to be baseless . . . A
Muslim is the brother of another Muslim and all the Muslims are brothers
of one another and constitute one hand as against the non-Muslims. The
blood of every one of them is equal to that of others and even the smallest
among them can make a promise on behalf of others.” —Muhammad
Muhammad’s address at the Kaaba overthrew the Meccan government and declared all of Islam,
anywhere in the world, to be a political and military state against all non-Muslims, regardless of
the non-Muslims’ political, geographical, or national origins.
“If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never
will it be accepted of him.” —Quran 3:85
Although the rightful owners of the Kaaba are the many religions that shared it before the
Islamic military conquest of Mecca, according to Subhani the Kaaba today is under the control of
a hereditary regime going back to Muhammad: “currently the 12th Imam from the direct descent
of the Prophet of Islam is the real protector, its custodian and guardian.”
All Islamic mosques everywhere in the world are required to have a clear visible indication
pointing in the direction of Mecca and the Kaaba, where the international political and military
state of Islam was founded. In most mosques there is a niche in the wall—the mihrab—that
points toward the seat of Islamic power. Each mosque, like the Kaaba, is governed by an Imam
in compliance with the political documents of Islam.
Mosques and the Political Documents of Islam
The Quran is the supreme political document of Islam—its political manifesto and political
constitution. It is the only constitution of the nation-state Saudi Arabia, which is the home of
Mecca and the Kaaba, where all mosques point, and is the birthplace of Islam.
The Quran is a totalitarian constitution. It demands submission by anyone within its jurisdiction.
The Quran governs all mosques everywhere in the world.
As a political document, the Quran asserts that everyone in the world is within its jurisdiction. So
far, Islam has not been able to enforce that totalitarian claim on the entire world, but has
managed to do so through threat, infiltration, violence, terrorism, and coercion on roughly 20%
of the world. It is engaged in a 1400-year-long Universal Jihad to dominate the rest of the world.
All mosques are its outpost headquarters.
Central to the Quran’s political mandates is prohibition of religious freedom and religious
tolerance, along with denouncements of religions such as Christianity and Judaism.
“O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends
and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he
amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them.” —Quran 5:51
“Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them,
beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)” —
Quran 9:5
All mosque leaders must be loyal to and supportive of these political and militaristic mandates.
The Quran as a political document also forbids separation of church and state. That is why every
Islamic nation, where Islamic leaders have managed to gain power, is a theocracy, ruled by the
Quran and Islamic Sharia law.
The Hadith (reported sayings and acts of Muhammad) and the Sira (the official biographies of
Muhammad) are the other political documents that, along with the Quran, constitute the basis for
Islam’s Sharia law.
“There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia.”
—Syed Qutb
Sharia law is administered by Islamic Imams who interpret the law and hand down rulings in
their sole discretion. Sharia law does not allow trial by jury. Sharia law also mandates a double
standard of laws for Muslims (believers) and infidels (non-believers). Sharia law mandates a
discriminatory tax, called jizya, on non-Islamic religions and nations:
“Fight those who believe not in Allah…until they pay the jizya with willing
submission, and feel themselves subdued.” —Quran 9:29
Sharia law also mandates discrimination toward women, and forbids any criticism of Islam or its
founder, stifling freedom of speech.
Sharia law also mandates that all men are slaves with no right to freedom of religion:
“Allah’s right on His slaves is that they should worship Him (Alone) and
should not worship any besides Him.” —Muhammad Sahih Bukhari
4:52:108, Narrated Mu’adh
Sharia law does not allow for separation of church and state. Sharia regards church and state as
one inseparable entity governing every aspect of individual and social life, both spiritual and
secular. That is why all Islamic nations are theocracies.
In short, Sharia law stands in direct opposition to the American Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The implementation of Sharia law demands the overthrow of the American Constitution and our
form of government and system of laws. Mosque leaders, in every nation in the world, are loyal
to the Quran, the Hadith, the Sira, and consider them divine law, and therefore supreme over all
manmade laws.
Other political and military documents of Islam include treaties of Muhammad, which are held in
reverence by Islam as models of conduct in relations between nations.
“Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah [Muhammad] a beautiful
pattern (of conduct) for anyone whose hope is in Allah.” —Quran 33:21
“War is deceit.” —Muhammad Sahih Bukhari 4:52:268, Narrated Abu
In one treaty proposal, to Jaifer and Abd, Muhammad wrote:
“If you two accept Islam, your country will, as usual, remain with you.
But if you refuse or object, it is a perishable thing.” —Muhammad
In another, to the Chiefs of Aqaba, he wrote:
“It is better for you either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jizya and
consent to remain obedient to Allah . . . If you do not accept these
terms . . . I shall have to wage war (to bring peace and security).” —
These same patterns and political mandates have been used over and over by Muslims since 610
A.D. to invade and conquer many civilizations and nations throughout the world, and to
eradicate human rights and freedoms in those lands. Iran once was called Persia and was
Zorastrian. Egypt was Christian. What was once a Hindu civilization was conquered and made
into Pakistan, which is now part of the Axis of Jihad, along with Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Afghanistan was Buddhist for thousands of years. Now its chief exports are heroin and Islamic
“When We decide to destroy a population, We (first) send a definite order
to those among them who are given the good things of this life and yet
transgress; so that the word is proved true against them: then (it is) We
destroy them utterly.” —Quran 17:16
In every instance where Islam has conquered and “destroyed utterly” a nation or civilization, the
key to the conquest was the establishment of mosques, which are political and military command
and control centers for Islam, and which all point toward the seat of Islamic power: the Kaaba.
Mosques and the Fallacy of the “Moderate Muslim”
The majority of Germans during World War II were not active members of the Nazi party, were
not waging war, and were not involved in the holocaust. The leaders, though, were active
members of the Nazi party, were waging war, and were involved in the holocaust.
The majority of Russians and eastern Europeans under the rule of the U.S.S.R. were not trying to
spread Communism throughout the world, and were not threatening and waging war and
revolution, but were going about their daily lives trying to survive. The leaders, though, were
doing everything they could to spread Communism throughout the world, and were threatening
and waging war and revolution.
Throughout history, since 610 A.D., the leaders of Islam have been waging Universal Jihad
around the world for the purpose of Islamic totalitarian domination of the world. It has never
mattered what percentage of the Muslim population was “peaceful” or “moderate.” Peace and
moderation are not relevant to the totalitarian mandates of Islam’s political documents, and
Islam’s leaders always follow the totalitarian mandates of Universal Jihad contained in them.
There are post-Nazi democracies. There are post-Communist democracies. There are no post-
Islamic democracies. Literal Islam, as contained in its political documents, is the consummate
totalitarianism. Neither Nazism or Communism had a metaphysical factor, as does Islam. Islam
uses its metaphysics as a wedge to drive in its totalitarian political doctrines.
Once Islam has established itself sufficiently in any nation, it seeks to overthrow any existing
regime or constitution or law, and replace it with Islamic theocracy. Even the most “moderate”
Muslim is bound to obey Islamic law, and so is bound to fight if ordered to fight:
“When you are called (by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth
immediately.” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 4:52:79:Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas
All Islamic mosques have Islamic leaders (rulers) who can call Muslims for fighting, and as such
are satellite headquarters for spreading Literal Islam’s political doctrine of world domination and
totalitarianism—no matter how many “moderate Muslims” they serve.
Mosques and the Worldwide Islamic State
Islam is a de facto political state wherever it exists anywhere in the world. The Quran is its
constitution. The Kaaba is its seat of power, still in the control of the regime that occupied it in
630 A.D. All Muslims in the world, regardless of nationality, are required to travel to the Kaaba
at least once in their lifetime and pay homage to it.
The fact that nations and international political institutions in the world do not recognize Islam as
a de jure state is irrelevant. Muhammad himself declared it as a state, and Islam’s own political
documents declare it to be a state, and, ipso facto, it always is a state-within-a-state, governed by
the Quran and Sharia law internally, anywhere that it has not yet gained full power and control.
“The Believers are but a single brotherhood.” —Quran 49:10
“A Muslim has no nationality except his belief.” —Syed Qutb
“Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face
of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam
regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam
is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program.” — Syed
Abul A’ala Maududi
Just as our Constitution of the United States binds and identifies us as a single political and legal
union of non-contiguous states, territories, political groups, and people, so the Quran binds and
identifies all Islamic nations and all Muslims as a single political and legal union of noncontiguous
nations, territories, political groups and people, regardless of geographic boundaries,
whose seat of power is the occupied Kaaba. All Islamic Imams, in every mosque everywhere in
the world, are bound to the Quran as supreme law.
As we have seen, Islamic law gives Islamic Imams the power to order Muslims to fighting. The
German Max Weber, who had considerable influence on international law and politics, defined
“state” as that entity that has a “monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given
Islam declares that the Quran and Sharia law are divine, and, as such, are the only “legitimate”
law in the world. In that way, Islam “self-legitimizes” its right to use physical force anywhere in
the world, and the right of every Imam in every mosque in the world to call for physical force
and violence at any time. This makes every Imam in every mosque a military leader.
Islam is a state by every definition and theory, and is a state hostile to and at war with the United
States of America and its Constitution.
Mosques and Treason and Sedition Against the U.S.
Islam’s political documents and law call for the overthrow of our Constitution and our man-made
laws, and therefore for the overthrow of our government, which by definition constitutes sedition
and treason. The Islamic documents call for the overthrow of our government—a protector of
religious freedom and human rights—through violence:
“I was ordered to fight all men until they say ‘there is no god but Allah.’”
—Muhammad’s farewell address, 632
“I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, ‘None has the
right to be worshipped but Allah.’” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 4:52:196
Narrated Abu Huraira
“He who fights so that Allah’s Word (Islam) should be superior, then he
fights in Allah’s cause.” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 1:3:125 Narrated Abu
“I asked the Prophet [Muhammad], ‘What is the best deed?’ He replied,
‘To believe in Allah and to fight for His Cause.’” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari
3:46:694 Narrated Abu Dhar
“And fight them till there is no more affliction (i.e. no more worshiping of
others along with Allah)”. —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 6:60:40 Narrated
“Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers.” —Quran
“I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the
hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their
finger-tips off them.” —Quran 8:12
“Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power,
including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of
Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but
whom Allah doth know.” —Quran 8:60
The Quran, as the constitution of Islam and Muslims, is diametrically opposite to the United
States Constitution and Bill of Rights. According to Islam and Muslims, the Quran is divine law,
uncorrupted and incorruptible, whereas the United States Constitution is man-made and is not
infallible, and therefore is corrupt. The U.S. Constitution is the antithesis of the Quran; therefore
Muslims have no obligation to obey it.
A mosque in the United States is a command and control center of a foreign political and military
state that seeks the overthrow of our government, and an Imam in a mosque is a political and
military representative of a foreign state that calls for the overthrow of the United States.
The laws of the United States provide specific criminal penalties for sedition and treason. These
laws are not only applicable to those advocating and calling for the overthrow of our
Constitution and our government; they are applicable to anyone who gives “aid or comfort” to
such declared enemies of the United States, or who “organizes or helps or attempts to organize
any society, group, or assembly of persons” so engaged. The terms “organizes” and “organize”
extend to “the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or
expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of
Mosques are just such units.
Vijay Kumar is a Republican candidate for U.S. Congress from Tennessee’s 5th District. A native
of Hyderabad, India, Mr. Kumar lived in Iran during the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when he came
to the United States. A naturalized American citizen, Mr. Kumar has lived in Nashville,
Tennessee for 24 years. He has been married to his wife, Robin, a native of Bowling Green,
Kentucky, for 27 years, and they have three children, two of whom are adopted.


One Response to “What a Mosque Really Is – Vijay Kumar explains”

  1. Salil Patel said

    Oh! You Hindu Awake!

    by Dr. Kamal Chatterjee, M.A., PH.D (U.S.A)



    Brahmins always criticize, condemn and mock at other religions Their criticism and mocking is unreasonable and unacceptable.

    In his autobiography, Dr Charles , an American scholar says that it is very simple to define a Hindu. He says a Hindu means “one who believes in anything and everything if said in the name of god and shall never question its authenticity”.

    The Brahmins claim that Lord Rama is incarnated (came in human form) to study and understand the difficulties of mankind. Is it really necessary for a god to incarnate Himself?? Can he not understand the creation? Why should God become a donkey or a cockroach in order to understand the sufferings of these creatures?



    Lord Rama is the central character to the Epic RAMAYAN (whose author was Valmiki) Rama is the son of Dasharath, the king of Banaras. Dasharath had three wives, kaushalya, kaikeyi and Smitra besides several hundreds concubines.

    According to the Ramayana, Rama spent most of his life trying to save his wife, Sita from the clutches of Ravan At the same time Rama was enjoying life to the full at every opportunity.



    When god Rama was exiled to the forest together with his wife, sukrievan appeared as deer and fooled god Rama. Although Rama was a “god”, he was not able to see through Sukreivan’s disguise!



    To retrieve his wife from Devil Ravan, god Rama sought the help of Hanuman, a monkey god. Hanuman agreed to help Rama bring his wife back on condition that god Rama in turn help him (Hanuman) to kill his twin brother prior to undertaking the mission.

    I took more than twelve years for Hanuman to build a bridge and accomplish the task while Ravan just took Sita and flew to Sri lanka in just one day’s time Where is the bridge that Rama built?? Who is more powerful – God Rama or Devil Ravan ? Would a god seek the help of another god to murder a third god?

    If Hanuman could fly carrying big mountains, he should have in the first instance carried and flown god Rama to Sri Lanka, which would have resulted in early rescue of Sita.
    Who knows what Ravan might have done to Sita during this period of twelve years? Definitely a devil would have done only “devilish” things!
    Before helping god Rama, Hanuman made Rama shoot his own twin brother in the back and only then did Hanuman help god Rama How can a “god” indulge in such a criminal act for personal gain?



    When God Rama was told to go to forest, he mournfully revealed to is mother: “if has been ordained that I have to lose the kingdom, forego the princely comforts and the tasty, MEAT DISHES. (Ayodha Kandam, 20, 26, 94th Chapters).



    Mr. C.R. Sreenivasa lyengar’s translation of Valmiki Ramayana says: ” Though Rama had married Sita to be the queen, he married many other wives for sexual pleasure in accordance with the royal customs. (Ayodha Kandam 8th Chapter, page 28). (The term “Rama’s wives” as been used in many places in Ramayan).



    Rama called his father ” A FOOL, AN IDIOT” (Ayodhya Kandam, 53rd Chapter).



    Rama disfigured and mutilated many women by cutting off her noses, breasts, ears etc., and tortured them (Soorpanaki, Ayomuki).

    Rama said, “Women should not be trusted” and that “Secrets should not be confided to the wife” (Ayodhya kandam, Chapter 100).

    Sambuka was slain (by Rama) because he was making penance which was forbidden to hime by Vedas as he was a “Shudra” (Uttara kanadam, Chapter 76).

    Looking at is hand Rama said the Sanskirt slogan “O right hand, you kill this Asche Shudra unhesitatingly as killing this Shudra is the only way to get back the life of the deceased Brahmin boy.”

    Are you not one of the limbs of Rama? (Valmiki Ramayana)
    Note: This Rama, who mercilessly took away the life of Sambuka for no other fault than that of making penance, is held as the Avatar (incarnation) of Vishnu (God)! If there were kings like Rama alive now, alas! what would be the plight of those who are called “Shudras?”.



    Rama , like an ordinary man, fell down into the river and was DROWNED. (Uttara Kandam, Chapter 106). How can a “god die? Who will then look after the affairs of the world?



    Sita told Rama “You are no better than a woman-monger who lets his wife for hire and makes is livelihood. You want to be profited by my prostitution”. Sita also told Rama “You lack in POTENCE, manners and charm” & “She called her husband a simpleton”.

    As soon as Sita stepped into Ravan’s palace her love towards Ravan grew more. (Aranya Kandam,
    Chapter 54).

    When at length Rama asked Sita to swear about her chastity, she declined and died. (Uttara kandam, Chapter 97).

    Kukuvavathy, sister-in-law of Rama, said to him – “Oh Elder! How you love Sita more than you love yourself! come with me and see what really is in your lovely wife’s heart. Still she could not forget that fellow Ravan. Drawing a picture of Ravan on hand-fan and pressing it closed to her bosom She is lying on your bed with eyes closed thinking on and rejoicing at Ravan’s glories. Rama sighed and went out to Sita’s house. There she was found sleeping pressing to her breast the hand-fan on which Ravan’s picture was drawn (This is found in pages 199, 200 of the Bengali Ramayana written by Mrs. Chandravathi).

    If Rama loved Sita so much and Sita is held as an ideal Hindu wife, can Hindu women tolerate their husbands leaving them in forest for the years? Rama left Sita in forest after se became pregnant and she delivered er two kids in forest. (DR. B. R. Ambedkar : Riddles in Hinduism Maharashtra Govt. Publication, 1987).



    “My Rama (god Rama) is not the Rama of Ramayana”. Mahatma Gandhi
    “The Ramayana and Mahabaratha are nothing but another Arabian Nights Story” Jawaharlal Nehru
    “Rama is not a god; but he is a hero” Rajagopalachari, First Governor-General of India and a great Brahmin leader.
    “Ramayan is not a divine story; it is only a literature” (Kaliyuga Kamban, T.K. Chidambaranatha Mudaliar). Babri Masjid was demolished by Rama Bhatkas claiming that it was his birth place.


    Lord krishna was very fond of looking at naked young girls. Once upon a time Krishna, in order to get a full view of some bathing virgin girls, went to the extent of hiding their clothes on the tree top just to get a panoramic view. Does he have divine immunity from looking at naked women?

    The Gita, a Holy book of the Hindus, quotes that when these bathing low caste girls begged for the return of their clothes, Lord Krishna demanded that they come out of the water with their hands raised instead of covering their bodies.

    Oh my innocent Hindu brethren! Can this action be attributed to god? Is this God capable of indulging in such ungodly acts? Will Hindu mothers tolerate their son imitating god Krishna??



    The “Times of India” reported on 12-11-87 that the Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, had published a book called “The Riddles of Hinduism” by Dr. Ambedkar.

    The report said that various statements contained in the book aroused the ire of some Brahmins, particularly the author’s observation on Rama & Dasharth’s many wives and also Krishna’s moral character. (The Riddles of Rama and Krishna is available from Dalit Saithya Academy, Bangalore-3).



    According to Hinduism, god Shiva’s head is the source of the river Ganges and his head is also the place where the moon is located (if this was really a fact then why should America send astronaut Neil Armstrong 240,000 miles away to the moon)

    According to Puranas, goddess Parvathi, wife of God Shiva, sought Shivas’s permission to have a baby When Shiva refused, Paravathi took dirt from her body and created Lord Ganesh. (The late E.V.R. Preiyar used to c

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: