Mission Europa Netzwerk Karl Martell

  • ACT for America

  • Support Ummat-al-Kuffar!

  • Participant at Counter Jihad Conferences

  • Counterjihad Brussels 2007

  • Counterjihad Vienna 2008

  • Counterjihad Copenhagen 2009

  • Photobucket
  • RSS International Civil Liberties Alliance

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Big Peace

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • Geert Wilders

  • International Free Press Society

  • Religion of Peace

Archive for July, 2010

Thank you, ACT! for America: Florida History Textbooks To Be Reviewed For Bias

Posted by paulipoldie on July 13, 2010

By Kelly Cook, National Field Director & Dr. Rich Swier, ACT! for America Sarasota Chapter Leader:

There is something historic going on in Florida. A group of concerned parents, grandparents and citizens have questioned the apparent bias in a world history textbook against Western Civilization. They were initially rebuffed before a local staff committee and have been granted an appeal before the entire Sarasota County School Board regarding the textbook in question! This is the first time in Florida State history that such an appeal has been granted!

The textbook that has raised the ire of local concerned citizens in Sarasota County is titled World History: Patterns of Interaction, published by McDougal Littell (now currently published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt). This textbook is currently on the Florida approved list of instructional materials.

Most, if not all, of the 67 county school districts in Florida use this same world history textbook. The textbook is fatally flawed, historically inaccurate and may violate the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution according to a comprehensive study of the textbook done by Dr. Terri K. Wonder (Click Here to read the study as a PDF document).

This textbook has an anti-Western, anti-capitalist, anti-Christian, anti-Jewish bias. Conversely it promotes Eastern and Middle Eastern Cultures, promotes Islam as a religion, promotes socialism and fails to address world history in a historically accurate manner.

Sarasota County ACT! for America Chapter Leader, Dr. Rich Swier, has approached the local School Board and asked that World History: Patterns of Interaction be removed from the district approved list of instructional materials. His work has lead to a historic event — the Sarasota County School Board will hear an appeal to the Superintendent of the Sarasota County School District’s decision to deny Dr. Swier’s complaint.

*****ACTION ITEMS*****

So how can you help to turn back the anti-Western civilization and creeping Sharia contained in this Florida textbook?

Here are five steps to make a real difference in YOUR local school district:

1. Find out if your local school district is using World History: Patterns of Interaction. If so, go to Step 2.

2. File a formal complaint with the School District Superintendent (not at the school level) using the study done by Dr. Terri K. Wonder as the basis of your complaint and request this textbook be removed from the District’s approved list of instructional materials. Attach the study by Dr. Wonder to the complaint as the evidence for removal of the textbook.

3. When the Superintendent appoints a Review Committee to address your complaint, be there to listen to the discussion, take notes, and make sure the process is fair and panel is qualified and unbiased.

4. If the Review Committee recommends to the Superintendent to remove the textbook and the Superintendent accepts that recommendation – Declare Victory. However, most likely they will not. If the Superintendent totally denies your complain, go to Step 5.

5. Submit a formal appeal to the denial of your complaint directly to the local elected School Board members. For a copy of Dr. Rich Swier’s appeal that he filed, Click Here.

Never before has a Florida School Board directly heard an appeal to a textbook challenge. That all changed in Sarasota County on June 14, 2010. The Sarasota County School Board was forced into the position to establish an appeals process when Dr. Swier’s complaint was denied by the Superintendent. The Board, upon deliberation and advice from their attorney, decided to use a quasi-judicial appellate process to address the appeal. This appeal option is in local school board policy, make sure there is an appeal in your local school board policy, if not they should have one.

In the state of Florida, if this appeal is denied by the local school board, there is a process in place to appeal to the Florida State Commissioner of Education. We will pursue this direction if necessary. There is a state textbook review scheduled for Florida next year. Any cloud of doubt raised through this appeal will really help during next year’s review!

Now is the time to find out if your school district is using World History: Patterns of Interaction and time for you to take a stand to stop the anti-Western bias and creeping Sharia in our children’s public school textbooks!

To learn more about how to make a difference in what our children are taught please contact Dr. Rich Swier at rswier@comcast.net or by phone at (941) 923-2541 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              (941) 923-2541      end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

If you live in the Sarasota area, the appeal will be heard by the school board on Tuesday, July 20th at the regularly scheduled late afternoon meeting. Each side in this appeal, the District and Rich Swier, will be given ten minutes to present their case with a five minute rebuttal by each side.

The public may comment. Three minutes is allotted to each person speaking. Please consider being there to make your voice heard!

Please contact the members of the board before the appeal to make your voice heard.

Here are the steps to take:

1. Be very respectful in your comments! The board has granted this appeal we’ve requested!

2. Please refer to Dr. Wonder’s work before you send an email to the members of the school board so that your points are well grounded in facts.

3. Here is the contact information for the Sarasota County School Board via email:

* Shirley Brown, Chair – shirley_brown@sarasota.k12.fl.us
* Carolyn Zucker – caroline_zucker@sarasota.k12.fl.us
* Frank Kovach – frank_kovach@sarasota.k12.fl.us
* Dr. Carol Todd – carol_todd@sarasota.k12.fl.us
* Dr. Kathy Kleinlein – kathy_klwinlein@sarasota.k12.fl.us

ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591

Posted in ACT! for America, Infiltration and Misinformation in Schools | 1 Comment »

What a Mosque Really Is – Vijay Kumar explains

Posted by paulipoldie on July 11, 2010

by Vijay Kumar
had been shared by polytheists, Christians, Jews, and Hindus, honoring 360 different deities. In
630 A.D. the Kaaba was captured by Islam in its military invasion and conquest of Mecca.
On the day of its capture, Muhammad delivered an address at the Kaaba in military dress and
helmet, according to Ayatullah Ja’far Subhani in his book, “The Message”:
“Bear in mind that every claim of privilege, whether that of blood or
property is abolished . . . I reject all claims relating to life and property and
all imaginary honors of the past, and declare them to be baseless . . . A
Muslim is the brother of another Muslim and all the Muslims are brothers
of one another and constitute one hand as against the non-Muslims. The
blood of every one of them is equal to that of others and even the smallest
among them can make a promise on behalf of others.” —Muhammad
Muhammad’s address at the Kaaba overthrew the Meccan government and declared all of Islam,
anywhere in the world, to be a political and military state against all non-Muslims, regardless of
the non-Muslims’ political, geographical, or national origins.
“If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never
will it be accepted of him.” —Quran 3:85
Although the rightful owners of the Kaaba are the many religions that shared it before the
Islamic military conquest of Mecca, according to Subhani the Kaaba today is under the control of
a hereditary regime going back to Muhammad: “currently the 12th Imam from the direct descent
of the Prophet of Islam is the real protector, its custodian and guardian.”
All Islamic mosques everywhere in the world are required to have a clear visible indication
pointing in the direction of Mecca and the Kaaba, where the international political and military
state of Islam was founded. In most mosques there is a niche in the wall—the mihrab—that
points toward the seat of Islamic power. Each mosque, like the Kaaba, is governed by an Imam
in compliance with the political documents of Islam.
Mosques and the Political Documents of Islam
The Quran is the supreme political document of Islam—its political manifesto and political
constitution. It is the only constitution of the nation-state Saudi Arabia, which is the home of
Mecca and the Kaaba, where all mosques point, and is the birthplace of Islam.
The Quran is a totalitarian constitution. It demands submission by anyone within its jurisdiction.
The Quran governs all mosques everywhere in the world.
As a political document, the Quran asserts that everyone in the world is within its jurisdiction. So
far, Islam has not been able to enforce that totalitarian claim on the entire world, but has
managed to do so through threat, infiltration, violence, terrorism, and coercion on roughly 20%
of the world. It is engaged in a 1400-year-long Universal Jihad to dominate the rest of the world.
All mosques are its outpost headquarters.
Central to the Quran’s political mandates is prohibition of religious freedom and religious
tolerance, along with denouncements of religions such as Christianity and Judaism.
“O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends
and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he
amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them.” —Quran 5:51
“Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them,
beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)” —
Quran 9:5
All mosque leaders must be loyal to and supportive of these political and militaristic mandates.
The Quran as a political document also forbids separation of church and state. That is why every
Islamic nation, where Islamic leaders have managed to gain power, is a theocracy, ruled by the
Quran and Islamic Sharia law.
The Hadith (reported sayings and acts of Muhammad) and the Sira (the official biographies of
Muhammad) are the other political documents that, along with the Quran, constitute the basis for
Islam’s Sharia law.
“There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia.”
—Syed Qutb
Sharia law is administered by Islamic Imams who interpret the law and hand down rulings in
their sole discretion. Sharia law does not allow trial by jury. Sharia law also mandates a double
standard of laws for Muslims (believers) and infidels (non-believers). Sharia law mandates a
discriminatory tax, called jizya, on non-Islamic religions and nations:
“Fight those who believe not in Allah…until they pay the jizya with willing
submission, and feel themselves subdued.” —Quran 9:29
Sharia law also mandates discrimination toward women, and forbids any criticism of Islam or its
founder, stifling freedom of speech.
Sharia law also mandates that all men are slaves with no right to freedom of religion:
“Allah’s right on His slaves is that they should worship Him (Alone) and
should not worship any besides Him.” —Muhammad Sahih Bukhari
4:52:108, Narrated Mu’adh
Sharia law does not allow for separation of church and state. Sharia regards church and state as
one inseparable entity governing every aspect of individual and social life, both spiritual and
secular. That is why all Islamic nations are theocracies.
In short, Sharia law stands in direct opposition to the American Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The implementation of Sharia law demands the overthrow of the American Constitution and our
form of government and system of laws. Mosque leaders, in every nation in the world, are loyal
to the Quran, the Hadith, the Sira, and consider them divine law, and therefore supreme over all
manmade laws.
Other political and military documents of Islam include treaties of Muhammad, which are held in
reverence by Islam as models of conduct in relations between nations.
“Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah [Muhammad] a beautiful
pattern (of conduct) for anyone whose hope is in Allah.” —Quran 33:21
“War is deceit.” —Muhammad Sahih Bukhari 4:52:268, Narrated Abu
In one treaty proposal, to Jaifer and Abd, Muhammad wrote:
“If you two accept Islam, your country will, as usual, remain with you.
But if you refuse or object, it is a perishable thing.” —Muhammad
In another, to the Chiefs of Aqaba, he wrote:
“It is better for you either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jizya and
consent to remain obedient to Allah . . . If you do not accept these
terms . . . I shall have to wage war (to bring peace and security).” —
These same patterns and political mandates have been used over and over by Muslims since 610
A.D. to invade and conquer many civilizations and nations throughout the world, and to
eradicate human rights and freedoms in those lands. Iran once was called Persia and was
Zorastrian. Egypt was Christian. What was once a Hindu civilization was conquered and made
into Pakistan, which is now part of the Axis of Jihad, along with Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Afghanistan was Buddhist for thousands of years. Now its chief exports are heroin and Islamic
“When We decide to destroy a population, We (first) send a definite order
to those among them who are given the good things of this life and yet
transgress; so that the word is proved true against them: then (it is) We
destroy them utterly.” —Quran 17:16
In every instance where Islam has conquered and “destroyed utterly” a nation or civilization, the
key to the conquest was the establishment of mosques, which are political and military command
and control centers for Islam, and which all point toward the seat of Islamic power: the Kaaba.
Mosques and the Fallacy of the “Moderate Muslim”
The majority of Germans during World War II were not active members of the Nazi party, were
not waging war, and were not involved in the holocaust. The leaders, though, were active
members of the Nazi party, were waging war, and were involved in the holocaust.
The majority of Russians and eastern Europeans under the rule of the U.S.S.R. were not trying to
spread Communism throughout the world, and were not threatening and waging war and
revolution, but were going about their daily lives trying to survive. The leaders, though, were
doing everything they could to spread Communism throughout the world, and were threatening
and waging war and revolution.
Throughout history, since 610 A.D., the leaders of Islam have been waging Universal Jihad
around the world for the purpose of Islamic totalitarian domination of the world. It has never
mattered what percentage of the Muslim population was “peaceful” or “moderate.” Peace and
moderation are not relevant to the totalitarian mandates of Islam’s political documents, and
Islam’s leaders always follow the totalitarian mandates of Universal Jihad contained in them.
There are post-Nazi democracies. There are post-Communist democracies. There are no post-
Islamic democracies. Literal Islam, as contained in its political documents, is the consummate
totalitarianism. Neither Nazism or Communism had a metaphysical factor, as does Islam. Islam
uses its metaphysics as a wedge to drive in its totalitarian political doctrines.
Once Islam has established itself sufficiently in any nation, it seeks to overthrow any existing
regime or constitution or law, and replace it with Islamic theocracy. Even the most “moderate”
Muslim is bound to obey Islamic law, and so is bound to fight if ordered to fight:
“When you are called (by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth
immediately.” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 4:52:79:Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas
All Islamic mosques have Islamic leaders (rulers) who can call Muslims for fighting, and as such
are satellite headquarters for spreading Literal Islam’s political doctrine of world domination and
totalitarianism—no matter how many “moderate Muslims” they serve.
Mosques and the Worldwide Islamic State
Islam is a de facto political state wherever it exists anywhere in the world. The Quran is its
constitution. The Kaaba is its seat of power, still in the control of the regime that occupied it in
630 A.D. All Muslims in the world, regardless of nationality, are required to travel to the Kaaba
at least once in their lifetime and pay homage to it.
The fact that nations and international political institutions in the world do not recognize Islam as
a de jure state is irrelevant. Muhammad himself declared it as a state, and Islam’s own political
documents declare it to be a state, and, ipso facto, it always is a state-within-a-state, governed by
the Quran and Sharia law internally, anywhere that it has not yet gained full power and control.
“The Believers are but a single brotherhood.” —Quran 49:10
“A Muslim has no nationality except his belief.” —Syed Qutb
“Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face
of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam
regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam
is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program.” — Syed
Abul A’ala Maududi
Just as our Constitution of the United States binds and identifies us as a single political and legal
union of non-contiguous states, territories, political groups, and people, so the Quran binds and
identifies all Islamic nations and all Muslims as a single political and legal union of noncontiguous
nations, territories, political groups and people, regardless of geographic boundaries,
whose seat of power is the occupied Kaaba. All Islamic Imams, in every mosque everywhere in
the world, are bound to the Quran as supreme law.
As we have seen, Islamic law gives Islamic Imams the power to order Muslims to fighting. The
German Max Weber, who had considerable influence on international law and politics, defined
“state” as that entity that has a “monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given
Islam declares that the Quran and Sharia law are divine, and, as such, are the only “legitimate”
law in the world. In that way, Islam “self-legitimizes” its right to use physical force anywhere in
the world, and the right of every Imam in every mosque in the world to call for physical force
and violence at any time. This makes every Imam in every mosque a military leader.
Islam is a state by every definition and theory, and is a state hostile to and at war with the United
States of America and its Constitution.
Mosques and Treason and Sedition Against the U.S.
Islam’s political documents and law call for the overthrow of our Constitution and our man-made
laws, and therefore for the overthrow of our government, which by definition constitutes sedition
and treason. The Islamic documents call for the overthrow of our government—a protector of
religious freedom and human rights—through violence:
“I was ordered to fight all men until they say ‘there is no god but Allah.’”
—Muhammad’s farewell address, 632
“I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, ‘None has the
right to be worshipped but Allah.’” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 4:52:196
Narrated Abu Huraira
“He who fights so that Allah’s Word (Islam) should be superior, then he
fights in Allah’s cause.” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 1:3:125 Narrated Abu
“I asked the Prophet [Muhammad], ‘What is the best deed?’ He replied,
‘To believe in Allah and to fight for His Cause.’” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari
3:46:694 Narrated Abu Dhar
“And fight them till there is no more affliction (i.e. no more worshiping of
others along with Allah)”. —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 6:60:40 Narrated
“Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers.” —Quran
“I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the
hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their
finger-tips off them.” —Quran 8:12
“Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power,
including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of
Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but
whom Allah doth know.” —Quran 8:60
The Quran, as the constitution of Islam and Muslims, is diametrically opposite to the United
States Constitution and Bill of Rights. According to Islam and Muslims, the Quran is divine law,
uncorrupted and incorruptible, whereas the United States Constitution is man-made and is not
infallible, and therefore is corrupt. The U.S. Constitution is the antithesis of the Quran; therefore
Muslims have no obligation to obey it.
A mosque in the United States is a command and control center of a foreign political and military
state that seeks the overthrow of our government, and an Imam in a mosque is a political and
military representative of a foreign state that calls for the overthrow of the United States.
The laws of the United States provide specific criminal penalties for sedition and treason. These
laws are not only applicable to those advocating and calling for the overthrow of our
Constitution and our government; they are applicable to anyone who gives “aid or comfort” to
such declared enemies of the United States, or who “organizes or helps or attempts to organize
any society, group, or assembly of persons” so engaged. The terms “organizes” and “organize”
extend to “the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or
expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of
Mosques are just such units.
Vijay Kumar is a Republican candidate for U.S. Congress from Tennessee’s 5th District. A native
of Hyderabad, India, Mr. Kumar lived in Iran during the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when he came
to the United States. A naturalized American citizen, Mr. Kumar has lived in Nashville,
Tennessee for 24 years. He has been married to his wife, Robin, a native of Bowling Green,
Kentucky, for 27 years, and they have three children, two of whom are adopted.

Posted in Islamization, Must Read, Sharia | 1 Comment »

Brigitte Gabriel Blasts Political Correctness

Posted by paulipoldie on July 11, 2010

Posted in ACT! for America, Videos | Leave a Comment »

Islamic Terror Caused by Small Minority of Muslims? Facts Prove Opposite

Posted by paulipoldie on July 11, 2010

from Rev. Sam Sewell
Friday, 09 July 2010 03:14

Think Islamic problems caused by a small minority of Muslims?

Read the facts, and think again!

As sure as I know that there will be another terrorist attack on the United States I know the day is coming when Muslims, or for that matter Arabs in general, are going to be hated on sight. I remember after 9/11 some nutcase in California killed a turban-wearing Sikh from India, because he thought he was an Arab.

mohammed_cartoonThere was an incident in Dallas immediately after Nine-Eleven. Another nutcase armed himself and drove around in his pickup on a killing spree. One victim was an Indian mini-grocer who’d lived there, legally and peacefully, for about 30 years. As I recall, this nut also killed a Pakistani shopkeeper, similarly situated and injured a Mexican. And as I recall, several such incidents occurred nationwide.

However, refusing to criticize, indeed vehemently condemn anything Islamic is pretty irrational, and will be costly if it doesn’t change. If a billion Moslems suddenly rose up in outrage against Usama Bin Lladin, Zawahiri, Nasrallah, Ahab Inajam and the rest of those deranged maniacs, the liberal-socialists and the rest of the world would join them, and we’d have a chance at eliminating this scourge.

Like many members of many religions, there are Muslims who are not radical and who follow Islam only because it is part of their family tradition. I have a good friend who is a Lebanese Christian. She and her Italian husband are already beginning to notice hate stares and rude behavior. Most folks just assume that she is a Muslim Arab. The Lebanese people do not consider themselves Arabs. Nevertheless, she and her husband are likely to be targets of American revenge, should the time come when reason is conquered by an emotionally-driven response to terrorism.

Maybe I will need to create a modern “Schindler’s list” for all my Mediterranean looking friends.

My comments cautioning over-reaction are intended to address attitudes & actions toward American citizens who are Muslim, or those who just look like they might be Muslim.  We need to be careful not to victimize the innocent citizens of our own country.

My reasoning for saying that our best policy is to assume that most Muslims support terrorism, unless there is strong evidence–other than their own testimony–to the contrary, goes like this: Those who support evil behavior, or do not resist evil behavior, share responsibility for the evil acts of others. Bystanders who cheer and bystanders who do not intervene are also guilty of the crime. If you are not FOR us, you are against us. I am not a racist, but my conscience could not be clear unless I am actively resisting racism. “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” Edmund Burke

Ergo, most Muslims support terrorism, unless they are actively resisting terrorism. I am quite aware that most Muslims do not commit acts of terror. But their religion requires them to kill non-Muslims, and their religion requires them to lie about their intentions. I would say that I might trust a Muslim wearing the uniform of our military services, but maybe they enlisted, looking for an opportunity to throw a grenade in their officers’ tent. Our best bet is to put Muslims on probation, and assume their terrorist intentions, until we know for sure where they stand.

I have disagreed with many people who claim that the Islamic terror problem is caused by small minority of radicals.  Their comments usually say something like “99% of Muslims are peaceful law abiding citizens”.  It is always uncomfortable to disagree with some one you like and admire, so I did a little research.  Research on American Muslims is rare or biased so here are some facts from around the world.

Read a small sampling of research about those “mostly” peaceful Muslims:

Have you heard “Young, Unmarried Muslim Males Are the Most Likely to Become Terrorists”?

No. It is de rigueur (customary) to suggest that young, unmarried, Muslim males are the most likely population to become terrorists, or to support terrorism. But from the perspective of the global supply of terrorists, this claim is false. Consider the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam in Sri Lanka. They are the world’s single largest group of suicide bombers. Their cadres are not Muslim, but Hindu by religion, and nearly 40 percent are female.

Even on the issue of support for terrorism, there is reason to be skeptical about the popular convention that young males are leading the pack. In a recent survey of 6,000 Muslims in 14 countries published in Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, females were more likely to support terrorism than were males. What’s more, married and unmarried persons are equally likely to support terrorism. Age matters less than one may think at first blush. In the same survey, some 47 percent of 62-year-olds surveyed were inclined to support terrorism. That percentage was only 10 points higher for 18-year-olds.

Young British Muslims believe, in surprising numbers (31 percent, according to the most recent poll,) that their country’s foreign policy justifies terror attacks.

Perhaps the most egregious case was that of the late British Muslim activist Kalim Siddiqui, who told a public meeting, “I would like every Muslim to raise his hand in agreement with the death sentence on Salman Rushdie. Let the world see that every Muslim agrees that this man should be put away.” Still, the Crown Prosecution Service refused to act, perhaps fearful of a poplar backlash. Polls showed almost a third of British Muslims agreed with Siddiqui and the Ayatollah.

Polls revealed that 57 percent of British Muslims regarded the campaign against the Taliban as a war on Islam.

When British Muslims were asked, “Is Britain your country?” only one in four claim that it is. Thirty percent of British Muslims would prefer to live under Sharia (Islamic religious) law than under British law. According to the report, “Half of those who express a preference for living under Sharia law say that, given the choice, they would move to a country governed by those laws.”

Twenty-eight percent hope for the U.K. one day to become a fundamentalist Islamic state.

The news is no less alarming on the question of freedom of speech. Seventy-eight percent of British Muslims support punishment for the people who earlier this year published cartoons featuring the Prophet Mohammed. Sixty-eight percent support the arrest and prosecution of those British people who “insult Islam.” When asked if free speech should be protected, even if it offends religious groups, 62 percent of British Muslims say No, it should not.

Support for terrorism: All the Muslim populations polled display a solid majority of support for Osama bin Laden. Asked whether they have confidence in him, Muslims replied positively, ranging between 8 percent (in Turkey) to 72 percent (in Nigeria). Likewise, suicide bombing is popular. Muslims who call it justified range from 13 percent (in Germany) to 69 percent (in Nigeria). These appalling numbers suggest that terrorism by Muslims has deep roots, and will remain a danger for years to come.

One in eight UK Muslims world wide ‘support terrorist attacks.’

A recent European poll found that 65% of Palestinians “support Al-Qaeda actions in the USA and Europe.”  (Fafo-Norwegian-based NGO, in Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, December 23, 2005) This strong support of those who would destroy America came in spite of hundreds of millions of dollars in annual US aid to the Palestinian alliance and was documented before the US announced a freeze in funding, after the election of the Hamas government.

A document, which was produced by officials from MI5 (British Intelligence) and the British Home and Foreign Offices, entitled “Young Muslims and Extremism” and drawn up for the prime minister by officials at the Home and Foreign and Commonwealth Offices, also states that anecdotal evidence suggests that up to 13 per cent, or 208,000 of Britain’s 1.6 million Muslims, defended the terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, while only 26 per cent feel loyalty toward England. That is not a tiny minority.

Muslim support for terrorist attacks against civilians:

Jordan:    88% sometimes or rarely, 11% never
Lebanon: 58% sometimes or rarely, 33% never
Pakistan: 44% sometimes or rarely, 35% never

These numbers contradict the claim that we are only dealing with a small minority of Muslims.  Today’s Islam is a pathology, and a significant portion of those who practice modern Islam are pathological.

Let us call for God’s grace to fall on those Muslims and Muslim looking people who are loyal Americans and are helping in the Global War On Terror.  I fear for them.

Rev. Sam Sewell


Rev. Sam Sewell is an ordained Christian clergyman, a member of Mensa, a U.S. Navy Veteran, and a Member of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers.  He is a frequent commentator on religious and political issues.


Posted in Brainwashing, Islamization, Must Read, Sharia | 5 Comments »

Meine Warnung an Amerika

Posted by paulipoldie on July 9, 2010

Gates of Vienna 9 Juli 2010
Von Baron Bodissey
Übersetzung: LIZ/EuropeNews

Die untenstehende Rede wurde von Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff auf der ACT! For America Konferenz in Alexandria, Virginia, am 28. Juni gehalten

Meine Warnung an Amerika

von Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff at ACT! For America Lasse Sie mich damit beginnen, euch Brigitte, Guy [Rodgers] und Kelly [Cook] zu danken, dass ihr mir die Gelegenheit gegeben habt, hier heute Nachmittag sprechen zu dürfen. Ich bedanke mich auch bei der Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa, Deutschlands bekanntester und erfolgreichster Menschenrechtsorganisation, die ich hier vertreten darf. Ohne deren finanzielle Unterstützung wäre ich nicht hier in diesem wunderbaren Land, um mit Ihnen zu sprechen und zu arbeiten.

Bevor ich anfange, lassen Sie mich kurz drei Geschichten erzählen:

Ich wuchs in Chikago auf, dort besuchte ich die Junior High School [A.d.Ü.: entspricht etwa der Mittelstufe eines Gymnasiums]. Um einen Abschluss machen zu können, musste ich die Verfassung studieren. Zu dieser Zeit verstand ich noch nicht, warum ich, als österreichische Staatsbürgerin, über eine Verfassung Bescheid wissen musste, die nicht meine eigene war. Trotzdem strengte ich mich an, um schließlich mit einem “C” zu bestehen.

Vor einigen Wochen sprach ich vor einem Publikum bestehend aus älteren College Studenten über meine Lebenserfahrungen, insbesondere die, die ich mit dem Islam gemacht habe und wie ich dazu kam, das zu tun, was ich heute mache. Ich war schockiert über die starke Indoktrinierung der Kinder, d.h. dass die Christen schlecht sind, wegen der Kreuzzüge, und dass wir Schuld an den Kriegen im Irak und in Afghanistan haben, und dass die Vereinigten Staaten böse seien. Ich sagte ihnen, dass sie aufhören müssten, sich selbst wegen historischer Anlässe schuldig zu fühlen. Die Antwort sollte stattdessen sein: wir müssen aus der Geschichte lernen und dürfen uns nicht selbst beschuldigen für etwas, das wir nicht ändern können.

Ein Student argumentierte kochend vor Wut, dass die Christen genauso schlecht und böse seien wie die Muslime, und er verließ den Raum, als ich über die Unvereinbarkeit von Scharia mit Verfassung, westlichen Werten und Gleichheit der Geschlechter sprach.

Zum Schluss komme ich zu Kitty Werthmann, einer 84-jährigen österreichischen Emigrantin, die jetzt in den Vereinigten Staaten lebt, und die kürzlich einen Augenzeugenbericht geschrieben hat, wie Österreich in den 30er Jahren Hitler erliegen konnte. Es gab damals eine hohe Arbeitslosenrate und viele Firmenpleiten in Österreich. Die politischen Parteien bekämpften sich gegenseitig in einem Bürgerkrieg. Als Ergebnis davon schauten sich die Österreicher ihren im Norden liegenden Nachbarn an und sahen, dass es dort kein Verbrechen gab, Vollbeschäftigung und einen hohen Lebensstandard. Hitler hatte Versprechungen gemacht und sie gehalten.

Als Hitlers Zeit in Österreich gekommen war, stimmte die Bevölkerung mit 98% für ihn. Das Land wurde an Deutschland angeschlossen und Hitler wurde mit der Regierung beauftragt.

Von da an erhielt Österreich: Recht und Gesetz; Vollbeschäftigung; eine Nationalisierung der Ausbildung ohne eine religiöse Erziehung; politische Indoktrinierung unter den Jugendlichen; eine Neuorganisation der Familie durch Tageshilfe. Aber, die Qualität der Gesundheitsversorgung litt, genau so wie kleinere Geschäfte. Hitler institutionalisierte den Verbraucherschutz, indem er den Verbrauchern sagte, was sie zu kaufen hatten und wie sie einkaufen sollten. Der industrielle Kapitalismus wurde lahm gelegt. Es entstanden mehr und mehr “Agenturen“, viele von ihnen sollten nur geschäftliche Unternehmungen überwachen.

Schließlich – das Wichtigeste – es gab keine Redefreiheit mehr. Jeder, der irgendetwas gegen die Regierung sagte, wurde verschleppt.

Frau Werthmann konnte beobachten, dass der Totalitarismus nicht plötzlich kam; es dauerte fünf Jahre, von 1938 bis 1943 [bis die voll enwickelte Diktatur sichtbar wurde, und bis die Menschen dies merkten]. Wenn es über Nacht geschehen wäre, so ist sie sich sicher, dann hätten ihre Landsleute auch gekämpft. Stattdessen gab es schleichende kleine Schritte [und der Staat bröckelte Stück für Stück und mit ihm seine Freiheiten].

Also, warum erzähle ich Ihnen diese Geschichte?

Frau Werthmann hätte auch die heutige Situation in Europa und insbesondere in Österreich beschreiben können. Wir erleben gerade die Wiederholung  der Geschichte.

Hohe Arbeitslosenquote?? Erledigt!

Bürgerkrieg unter den politischen Parteien? Sicherlich, in einem wörtlichen Sinne. Es gibt heutzutage ein wahrnehmbares Fehlen eines klassischen Diskurses. Melanie Phillips arbeitet dies brillant in ihrem Buch The World turned Upside Down [Die aus den Fugen geratene Welt] heraus, “Andersdenkende werden als pathologisch krank bezeichnet – Homophobie, Xenophobie, Islamophobie – Phobien oder irrationale Ängste werden als Synonym für Vorurteil benutzt. Es gibt sogar ganz unverblümte Anschuldigungen, krank zu sein, eine Waffe die sonst von totalitären Bewegungen benutzt wird […]. Jede Tatsache, die das Weltbild der Linken in Frage stellt wird ignoriert, verleugnet oder wegdiskutiert, denn wenn man zugeben würde, dass daran auch nur ein Fünkchen Wahrheit wäre, würde dies das gesamte utopische Kartenhaus zum Einsturz bringen […]. Jeder, der sich gegen die falschen Anschuldigungen der Linken wendet muss rechtsextrem und somit ein “Faschist“ sein. Auf diese Art und Weise wird die Wahrheit dämonisiert – und je größer der Wahrheitsgehalt ist, der erzählt wird, desto mehr wird der Erzähler dämonisiert.“ Erledigt!

Im Jahr 1994 stimmten sage und schreibe 66.6% der Österreicher für einen Beitritt Österreichs zur Europäischen Union, nachdem zuvor eine noch nie da gewesene Gehirnwäsche-Kampagne stattgefunden hatte, und die Bevölkerung Glauben gemacht wurde, dass es keine Alternative zur EU geben würde. Beispielsweise wurde den österreichischen Wählern gesagt, dass die EU eine große Anzahl Arbeitsplätze hervorbringen würde, d.h. Vollbeschäftigung. Es würde keine Diskriminierung mehr geben; der Multikulturalismus würde sicherstellen, dass jeder und alles gleich sein werde. Öffentliche Schulen müssten nicht mehr länger Religionsunterricht anbieten (außer jenen, die den muslimischen Glauben unterrichten). Die Pro-EU Indoktrination war und ist unheimlich erfolgreich, insbesondere unter den Jugendlichen und den Studenten an der Universität, denen beigebracht wird, dass die EU großartig sei, die Lösung für alle Probleme, und dass es ohne sie Unheil und Krieg geben würde. Politiker, wie der ehemalige italienische Präsident Giorgio Napolitano oder der ehemalige österreichische Parlamentspräsident Andreas Khol bezeichnen EU Kritiker sogar als “Terroristen”. Die EU ist auch ein Instrument um ein neues Familienkonzept zu installieren, inklusive eines neuen deutschen Begriffs des “Elternkonzepts”, das vorsieht, dass man nicht mehr zwischen Männern und Frauen unterscheidet.

Am wichtigsten ist aber, dass es keine Redefreiheit mehr gibt. Wenn jemand etwas gegen die Mehrheitsmeinung sagt, dann werden Karrieren und der Ruf mit Hilfe von Verleumdungen und der Anklage, dass man entweder ein Faschist oder Nationalsozialist sei, systematisch zerstört. Melanie Phillips erklärt dieses Phänomen in ihren Büchern, “J.L. Talmon erkannte im Jahr 1952 bereits [das Konzept der] ‚totalitären Demokratie’, die er als ‘Diktatur basierend auf der Ideologie und dem Enthusiasmus der Massen’ erkannte. “Zusätzlich, ” rottete ein mittelalterliches Christentum – wie der gegenwärtige Islam – jeglichen Widerspruch aus, oder tötete Andersdenkende oder zwang sie zur Konversion. Und die Großinquisitoren wurden in der intelligenten Oberschicht gefunden – in den Universitäten, den Medien, der Rechtssprechung, der Politik und den professionellen arbeitenden Klassen – die nicht nur systematisch die Grundfesten der westlichen Gesellschaft unterminiert haben, sondern auch heftig dabei sind zu versuchen jede Kritik und jeden Protest zu unterbinden.“ Und dann, “Es ist schwer, den Einfluss auf unsere Kultur zu bewerten, der von den Doktrinen des Anti-Imperialismus, Multikulturalismus, Feminismus, Umweltbewusstseins und ähnlichem ausgeht. Sie bilden die nicht in Frage zu stellende Orthodoxie innerhalb der Akademikerschaft, quasi das Basislager ihres „langen Marsches durch die Institutionen,’ den sie mit erstaunlichem Erfolg durchgesetzt haben. Das Zentrum der politischen Macht ist verschoben worden, so dass jeder der diese Werte nicht teilt als extrem definiert wird.“ Phillips fügt hinzu, dass “Im Falle der Freiheit, denjenigen die versuchen, anarchistisches Verhalten zu begrenzen, um Leid zu vermeiden, die Freiheit, dies zu tun, aberkannt wird.“

Wien ist keine Stadt der Knobelbecher und Swastika wie Herb London kürzlich aus erster Hand beobachten konnte. Es ist eine wohlhabende, friedliche und zivilisierte Stadt. Aber nur auf den ersten Blick. Es gibt noch ein anderes Wien, eines, das Orte umfasst, an denen eine muslimische Mehrheit lebt, mit Feindseligkeiten, die hohe Kriminalitätsraten hervorrufen und mit hoher Arbeitslosigkeit, die das Resultat aus der Unwilligkeit oder Unfähigkeit der jungen Muslime ist, die Regelschulzeit zu beenden.

Das Establishment zieht es vor, wegzusehen, und kritisiert andauernd diejenigen, die es wagen, die demokratischen Werte und Ideale aufrecht zu erhalten.

Ich bin eine von ihnen. Und ich bin abgestempelt worden als rechtsextreme Fanatikerin, weil ich mich gegen die muslimischen Praktiken ausspreche und gegen die Einführung der Scharia in Europa, beides ist mit den säkularen und liberalen Werten der westlichen Gesellschaft nicht kompatibel. Ich sehe mich einer möglichen Anklage wegen Volksverhetzung gegenüber, weil ich Menschen in Seminaren, die hinter verschlossenen Türen stattfinden, den Islam erkläre und dabei aus dem Koran zitiere. Ich wurde, um Herb Londons Worte zu gebrauchen, als Extremistin von den österreichischen Behörden an den Rand gedrängt.

Und hier schließt sich der Kreis:  ich beschwöre Sie, verteidigen Sie die Verfassung und ihre Prinzipien, insbesondere die Redefreiheit, die Trennung von Kirche und Staat, die Bill of Rights. Ich habe das damals, in den 80er Jahren noch nicht zu schätzen gewusst, aber ich tue es jetzt. Wir müssen unsere indoktrinierte Jugend deprogrammieren, wir müssen ihnen beibringen, sich selbst und ihre Geschichte zu respektieren, anstatt beschämt zu sein.

Und vergessen Sie niemals, was Frau Werthmann sagte, “Wegen seiner Verfassung ist Amerika (eines der) großartigsten Länder dieser Welt geworden.

Lassen Sie niemals diese Freiheit aus den Fingern gleiten.

Denn nach Amerika gibt es kein Land mehr, in das man gehen könnte!“

Posted in ACT! for America, Österreich, Berichte von Konferenzen, Counterjihad, Fight back!, Islam - What can we do? Was können wir tun?, Islamisierung, Must Read | Leave a Comment »

Alliance to Stop Sharia Formed in France: An Interview, Part 1

Posted by paulipoldie on July 9, 2010

Posted by Ned May Jul 8th 2010

Controversies concerning Islam are becoming more frequent and more public in countries all across Europe. The success of Geert Wilders in the recent Dutch elections, the Swiss minaret ban, the rise of the EDL in Britain, the movement in several countries to ban the burqa, the issue of new mega-mosques, such as the one in Marseilles — all of these issues highlight the clash between Islam and traditional European civilization.

Countries with secularism written into their constitutions encounter a problem with any official effort to oppose Islamization. How can Islam be stopped as long as the state is enjoined not to interfere in religious affairs? In particular, the constitutions of France and the United States forbid any state meddling with religions. We Americans have the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and the French have an official policy of laïcité — the complete removal of religious matters from the purview of the government.

A French writer who blogs under the nom de plume “Gandalf” at Vérité, Valeurs et Démocratie recently founded the Alliance to STOP Sharia. The Alliance is completely unconcerned with Islamic religious beliefs — as far as it is concerned, Muslims may believe whatever they want. Instead, the focus is on Sharia, or Islamic law.

Below is the first installment of a four-part interview with Gandalf about the strategy behind the Alliance to STOP Sharia.

Q: You say that you do not take issue with Islamic beliefs or religious doctrines, but only with the body of law known as Sharia. Could you please explain the reasons for your focus on Sharia?

A: Well, let’s begin with Islamic beliefs and religious doctrines. We cannot take issue with someone’s beliefs for the simple reason that we are respectful of their human rights. In a democratic society you have the right to believe what you want; it’s as simple as that. Let me add that having issues with what’s inside your neighbour’s brain seems a very unproductive way of spending your time.

Sharia is an entirely different matter, Sharia in an occidental society is of a political nature (politics being the thing that rules society). In a Muslim society Sharia is of religious essence but we are not in a Muslim society, and we don’t have to consider their weltanschaaung in this matter.

Some people pretend to introduce something they consider as a body of laws into our society. Laws regulating individual and collective behaviour, morals, clothing, food, justice, matrimonial relations, sexual life, inheritance, citizenship status, and even what you are allowed to believe or not believe. Laws voted by nobody, laws absolutely incompatible with the principles of democracy, laws violating each and every human right you can think of, laws rejecting our basic civilisational concept of human dignity, and you ask why we focus our concerns on the Sharia?

Let me return your question by asking this: why hasn’t everyone in our democratic countries focused yet on the Sharia problem we are facing today?

Some clever souls say that it only concerns Muslim people, why should we care?

What is a Muslim? A new kind of citizen having different rights and obligations? A new kind of citizen denied the benefits of his constitutional rights, of his basic human rights — especially if this Muslim person is a woman?

We don’t know what a Muslim is, and to be really honest, we don’t care. But we know what a free citizen is and we know what Sharia does to people: it enslaves them in a degrading servitude. Sharia is mental slavery, that’s why we take issue with it.

Posted in Islamization, Sharia | 2 Comments »

This is ACT! for America

Posted by paulipoldie on July 6, 2010

Posted in ACT! for America, Islam - What can we do? Was können wir tun?, Videos | Leave a Comment »

Welcome to ACT for America

Posted by paulipoldie on July 6, 2010

Posted in ACT! for America, Fight back!, Islam - What can we do? Was können wir tun?, Videos | Leave a Comment »

ACT for America – What is it – Intro

Posted by paulipoldie on July 6, 2010

Posted in ACT! for America, Videos | Leave a Comment »

Reverse Jihad

Posted by paulipoldie on July 6, 2010

This is a website worth fowarding to all of your friends:

Reverse Jihad

A Conversation About Jihad

A FRIEND of mine, Phil, was in town to promote his new book. We went out to lunch with another friend of ours from this area, Stan, a man who runs a multi-station radio conglomerate. We were talking about this and that when Phil mentioned an experience he had in a church in the Midwest.

Phil goes to church every week. And for awhile the church had speakers from various religions come to speak to them. One week they had a Hindu teacher come speak to the congregation, and the next week it was a Buddhist priest (this is a very open-minded church), and the third week it was a Muslim imam.

Phil said, “I couldn’t believe the imam. He scared the old ladies. Every other thing he said was about cutting off someone’s head.” Phil looked surprised.

Now I hadn’t seen either of these guys for awhile and in the meantime I had learned a lot about Islam and I hadn’t really talked to many people about what I was learning. I said, “Awhile back I read the Qur’an because I wondered about Islam.”

“Wondered?” asked Stan. “What do you mean?”

“Well, I’ve heard terrorists like Osama bin Laden quoting the Qur’an, talking about the obligation of all Muslims to subjugate the infidel and their responsibility to wage jihad, and then I’ve heard people like George Bush quoting peaceful passages from the Qur’an and saying Islam is a religion of peace, and I just wanted to know what the real story was. So read the Qur’an cover to cover.

“It’s been a real eye-opener,” I said. “First of all, the copy I first started reading jumped around and it was hard to follow. Then I found out that the traditional way to print the book — the traditional order of the chapters — is simply from the longest to the shortest chapter. So I found a book (A Simple Koran) that prints it in the order it was actually written, in chronological order, and it is much easier to follow that way.”

Stan looked puzzled. He has a curious, inquiring mind. “I wonder why they printed it that way? That seems like an odd order to print a book.”

“Yes,” I said. “A secretary for one of the caliphs, I think his name was Zayd, decided that’s how to arrange the chapters. Even at the time, people criticized his strange arrangement. But he was the secretary and that’s the way he wanted it. Now it’s just traditional.

“But something is revealed by reading the book in chronological order that I don’t think you would see in the traditional chapter order: You see a dramatic change in the kind of revelations Muhammad has over time.”

“Muhammad is the main guy, right?”

“Yes, he’s the prophet. He’s the one who first recited the Qur’an.”

“What changed?” Phil asked. “What do you mean?” They were both curious now. They leaned forward, interested.

Glad to be sharing something so important with two people I care about, I said, “The nature of the revelations changed. And the book I read (A Simple Koran) gives you some of the surrounding history too, so you can see why the revelations changed.

“Muhammad originally lived in Mecca and Muslims were a minority. Obviously when he first started, he and his wife were the only Muslims on earth. Everyone else in the city of Mecca already had their own religions. Muhammad went around preaching his new religion and criticizing everyone else’s. People didn’t like that.”

My friends laughed. Of course people didn’t like that. “So after about thirteen years of preaching,” I went on, “Muhammad had gained 150 converts, but they were still a minority, and the Muslims’ relations with leaders of other religions had become increasingly hostile over the years. It was getting pretty hot around there, so Muhammad moved to Medina, where he had some friends.

“And that’s when the revelations really started changing,” I said. “For the first three-fourths of the book, the revelations were mostly about heaven and hell and how if you are a good Muslim and follow the rules you’ll go to heaven and if you don’t follow the rules or if you doubt Muhammad is really the Prophet, you’ll burn in hell and the only thing you’ll have to drink is boiling water, etc.

“But the last fourth of the book is very different. Once Muhammad gets to Medina, his group starts raiding caravans that are going to Mecca.”

“Muhammad did that?” Phil and Stan both looked surprised.

“Yes. Muhammad went on some raids himself, and sometimes he just sent some of his Muslim followers on raids. And they would sometimes kill the men and take the women as slaves, and of course take all the valuable goods in the caravan.”

Again, both of them looked shocked. Astonished. Surprised. And yet, it looked as if years of accumulated confusion vanished in an instant. Stan said, “So that’s where the terrorists got the idea.” Stan has a great sense of humor and he was making a joke, and we all laughed, but that’s the light bulb I could see go on in these guys’ heads.

I went on. “So they started doing pretty well, financially. Muhammad kept a fifth of the booty from the raids and the rest of the Muslim raiders split up the four-fifths. Muhammad started getting more recruits because this was a pretty sweet gig. He started growing an army. And the revelations changed accordingly.

“Up until this time, Muhammad had been trying to get the Christians and Jews to admit that in their own scriptures, Muhammad’s coming had been foretold. His arrival was prophesied in their holy books. He was sure of this, and he wanted the Jews and Christians to say so. He wanted them to validate his legitimate prophethood as one of a long line of prophets (Abraham, Moses, Jesus, etc.) but the Christians and the Jews wouldn’t validate him.

“So in the first three-fourths of the Qur’an, the revelations are relatively tolerant of Christians and Jews. He was trying to curry their favor. But once Muhammad had an army, and once he realized they would never acknowledge him as a prophet, his revelations became less and less tolerant, and then they became violent.

“Now here’s one of the strangest things,” I said. “When the nature of the revelations changed, the Qur’an started accumulating contradictions. It had these tolerant passages earlier and then less tolerant passages later. But the Qur’an itself, conveniently enough, has a passage that tells Muslims what to do about this. In the Qur’an, Allah says, ‘If something I say now contradicts something earlier in the Qur’an, the later revelation overwrites the earlier one. The earlier one is null and void, and the newer one is the better one.’

“The bad news is the tolerant passages are earlier and the intolerant, violent passages are later.

“So finally I realized how it was possible to have peaceful quotes and violent quotes, both from the Qur’an. The Qur’an is not like the Christian Bible. It isn’t written by different people at different times. There are no vague analogies or symbolic passages given to multiple interpretations. It is written by one man and is very direct, straightforward writing. So how could it contain contradictions? Now I know.”

“So, wait a minute.” Phil looked concerned. “You’re saying the peaceful passages don’t count any more?”

“Right. They don’t count. They have been overwritten by passages that say things like, ‘Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them,’ which is a passage from the very last revelation of Muhammad.

“Not only that,” I said, my head now swimming with things I’ve discovered that these guys didn’t know, “but they’re supposed to follow Muhammad’s example. It says in the Qur’an, and says it more than seventy times, that Muslims should follow Muhammad’s example. He is the model. He’s the one to imitate.”

“That’s not good,” said Stan.

“No, that’s not good. Muhammad didn’t think well of ‘monkery.’ He didn’t think it was a good thing for devoted religious people to seclude themselves in a monastery. He didn’t believe in asceticism. He thought that was the lazy coward’s way out. According to Allah, you show your devotion — you demonstrate your faith — in the real world by fighting in jihad, fighting for Allah, doing things you’re afraid to do, fighting against the unbelievers, working to make sure all governments follow the law of Allah.

“Muhammad believed anyone could talk a good story or say a good prayer, but jihad is putting your money where your mouth is. Do you really believe? Prove it: Risk your life in combat. If you really believe what the Qur’an says then you know when you die in jihad you will go straight to Paradise without judgment, and all your sins will be instantly forgiven. If you are afraid of fighting, war, or death, it proves your unbelief.

“Fighting jihad is so highly valued by Allah that dying in jihad is the only way to guarantee your passage to heaven. You may have a chance to get into heaven if you do good works and do not sin. But if you die fighting against unbelievers, you are guaranteed passage to heaven.”

“Wow,” said Stan. They both looked amazed. Stunned, really. These are grown men. They read a lot. Both of them are educated, well-informed, successful people. Both are very bright, intelligent men. And they didn’t know any of this.

These guys have known me for a long time, so they trusted what I said. They know I’m not a racist or a bigot, and they know I am not prone to fanatacism and I am not a hater. So they accepted what I said with open minds. And what I told them was accurate, as they assumed. But people who hear about it from someone they don’t know well might easily dismiss this kind of information. So I recommend to everyone to just read the Koran themselves. That’s really the only way to know for sure.

I’m sure I don’t have to remind you that this is deadly serious business. It makes a huge difference what people know about Islam. The Jihadis don’t want non-Muslims to be made aware this information (they can go about their Jihadi business with less interference if most people remain ignorant of the political goals of Islam) and they now have an “internet jihad” going on, hacking in and trying to shut down sites that alert people to their plans and methods.

Just the two pieces of information — that later passages overwrite earlier ones and that a good Jihadi will deliberately deceive non-Muslims — is enormously clarifying and damaging to their cause. But they can’t hack into your one-on-one conversations, and that’s really where the rubber meets the road.

So read the Koran and share what you learn. And share articles from this site. Let’s have an informed population so we can figure out how to peacefully and effectively protect ourselves from the fundamentalist Muslims without being jerks to the peaceful Muslims. Let’s stop listening to everyone’s opinions and read the Koran ourselves.


Posted by Citizen Warrior at 9:34 AM 2 comments


What You Can Do To Reverse Jihad’s Advance

NOT ONLY ARE Jihadis killing people around the world in impressive numbers, but they are also invading democracies, demanding and gaining concessions from non-Muslims, and slowly encroaching on democratic freedoms with the end-goal of establishing the repressive form of law known as Shari’a. Obviously, this must be stopped. The situation is urgent and your help is needed.

But you’re not a soldier. You don’t work for a counterterrorist organization. What can you do? There are a surprising number of practical, effective actions you can take to become a Citizen Warrior right where you are. Each of the actions below is linked to an article that explains more about it:

1. Join ACT! for America and participate.

2. Participate in the Girl Effect.

3. Help and support the Mapping Sharia Project.

4. Support an open fuel standard. This can take away massive financing for Jihadis.

5. Share DVDs with your friends.

6. Read the Qur’an.

7. Help and support Watch Obsession, the organization.

8. Talk to your friends about jihad. (It will help to study the art of influence.)

9. Share online articles, but skillfully.

10. “Advertise” the URL, haltterrorism.com.

11. Learn how to recognize suspicious activities and report them to authorities.

12. Contribute news items to Concessions to Islam.

13. Contribute stories of citizen warrior heroes to Citizen Warriors.

14. If there are people you would hesitate to talk about Islam with, encourage them to go see the mainstream movies, An American Carol, or Religulous. Send your liberal and non-religious friends to Religulous, and send your patriotic, Christian, or Jewish friends to An American Carol. Both movies broach the subject of jihad. Afterwards, the topic will be easier to discuss.

15. Participate in the “Stop the Jihad on Campus” annual events.

16. Support the development of energy sources other than oil.

17. Promote peace…one school at a time. You can help and support Greg Mortenson’s work creating good schools that can successfully compete with madrassas that promote hatred of the West.

18. Get Jihadi videos removed from YouTube.

19. Sign a petition right now that urges our politicians to take some action to prevent free countries from Islam’s relentless encroachment.

20. If you have investments, you can help cut off money to Jihadis.

21. Tell others about this list. Share with others the domain name, WhatYouCanDoAboutIslam.com.

22. Share online videos. This page has an updated list of recommended videos. If you know of one not on the list, please add it.

23. Try some glamourbombing.

24. Submit story ideas to reporters and news outlets.

25. Educate and motivate the public using FaceBook.

26. Help support Citizen Warrior.

27. Set your watch alarm for 10:03 AM.

Don’t try to do all of these. You’ve got to be smart about this, and that includes keeping your motivation level high, getting enough sleep, and having a life. Feeling overwhelmed by things that must be done is not good for your motivation and it can impair your ability to persist.

So choose one or two of these things that most interest you, and get to work on it. You can always come back to this list later if you want to do more.

Also, I urge you to share this list with people you know who want to do something about “terrorism” but don’t know what. Let’s defeat the Jihadis and Islam’s relentless encroachment with our effective actions.

When you find new effective actions that are not on this list, would you please take a moment and share it with us in the comments?

Posted in Fight back!, Islam, Islam - What can we do? Was können wir tun? | Leave a Comment »